So... the observers know better than the people involved in the business.dougthonus wrote:Stratmaster wrote:I believe Lonzo said it. I don't believe the front office or Lonzo meant it the way Doug is interpreting it. I mean, they already had Lavine and Vuc, and got Derozan and Ball at about the same time. I am sure they looked at the "Big 2", about to be "Big 3" and said "we need a PG to be a cog and make this work. That isn't building around Lonzo. It is the opposite of that. That is building around the Big 3 by adding a complementary piece.
You asked why Lonzo would say something positive and why fans might feel something differently.
I told you how Lonzo views the front office and why. Lonzo views them positively because his view is they did the best thing for him that any front office has done. Fans view them negatively, because whether they did the best thing for Lonzo, solely in Lonzo's mind, is really not a relevant factor in fan evaluation of the front office.
Lonzo's connection to the FO is fundamentally different from a fan connection and his view of them is not influenced primarily with the quality of the team they put together but on the relationship they had individually. It's apples and ferraris as a comparison.
And then we will go on to talk about how "no players will come to Chicago because the organization sucks". And those players opinions will matter.
If people tried to play both sides of every subject to confirm their bias any more desperately on here, this would be a.... sports message board.
Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app