Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time

Moderators: HomoSapien, Michael Jackson, kulaz3000, dougthonus, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, coldfish, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,871
And1: 32,599
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1921 » by fleet » Mon May 6, 2024 11:57 pm

Caleb has been trying to singlehandedly bring back baggy clothes. I will support his movement. As an aging male no longer in full control of the waistline.

Read on Twitter
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,137
And1: 4,341
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1922 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Tue May 7, 2024 12:19 am

I’m curious to see how Poles handles draft picks going forward. He positioned us nicely to win now and we have decent depth everywhere. Just because he’s been the type to flip them for pieces we need via trades so far does that mean he’ll continue to do so going forward.
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
Almost Retired
Rookie
Posts: 1,157
And1: 611
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1923 » by Almost Retired » Tue May 7, 2024 12:35 pm

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:I’m curious to see how Poles handles draft picks going forward. He positioned us nicely to win now and we have decent depth everywhere. Just because he’s been the type to flip them for pieces we need via trades so far does that mean he’ll continue to do so going forward.


The 2025 Draft will be the time to bolster the Defense. The Draft will be top heavy with Defensive playmakers at all 3 levels. Very few outstanding QBs. Draft BPA on all 3 levels for depth and the inevitability that we won't be able to retain all our young stars due to the salary cap.
Dresden
RealGM
Posts: 12,299
And1: 5,963
Joined: Nov 02, 2017
       

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1924 » by Dresden » Tue May 7, 2024 3:07 pm

fleet wrote:The Sweat deal was premature for me. The kind of thing a young team would add as a final piece more or less to go for the division on a ready team. Which is part of what invited some of the scrutiny. Had it been a deal done in the middle of this season in pursuit of first place, then nobody would really question it to the degree it was questioned. As such, it seemed like a deal for Eberflus to be able to survive easily, which I don’t see as very “smart” team-building, unless he was some kind of coach with special ability to worry about losing


Why would a GM make a trade in order to help his coach save his job, when the GM is the one who decides the fate of the coach? You can't always get the guy you want, when you want him. It's not like walking into a 7-11 and saying "I'll take one starting Edge please".

Poles saw an opportunity and he took it. There's no guarantee the same sort of player would be available this coming season, nor is there a guarantee that if there was, his team would chose to take the Bears offer.

So this kind of nitpicking- saying, "well, it's a decent deal, but it came a season too soon", to me, ignores the reality of how hard it is to make deals, for the kind of player you want, for the price you're willing to pay, and when you want them.

Not to mention that at the time, the Bears pass rush was an embarrassment, and the team was still not completely out of the playoff picture. So just like the year prior with Claypool, Poles saw an area of glaring weakness, and did something to address it.
User avatar
JohnnyKILLroy
RealGM
Posts: 12,137
And1: 4,341
Joined: Jun 18, 2008
Location: Fountain Valley- A nice place to live
       

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1925 » by JohnnyKILLroy » Tue May 7, 2024 3:13 pm

Almost Retired wrote:
JohnnyKILLroy wrote:I’m curious to see how Poles handles draft picks going forward. He positioned us nicely to win now and we have decent depth everywhere. Just because he’s been the type to flip them for pieces we need via trades so far does that mean he’ll continue to do so going forward.


The 2025 Draft will be the time to bolster the Defense. The Draft will be top heavy with Defensive playmakers at all 3 levels. Very few outstanding QBs. Draft BPA on all 3 levels for depth and the inevitability that we won't be able to retain all our young stars due to the salary cap.


I don’t think he’ll zero in on defensive players necessarily, we’re pretty deep everywhere. I think he’ll let the board come to him. Just as an example I’d rather have a top rated C than a lower rated DB.

I wouldn’t mind keeping out picks in the earlier rounds 1-3 and then trading down with the rest of our picks. I’m very curious to see how Poles handles future drafts.
What is happiness? It's a moment before you need more happiness.” — Don Draper
othawhitemeat
Veteran
Posts: 2,541
And1: 761
Joined: May 14, 2004

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1926 » by othawhitemeat » Tue May 7, 2024 4:24 pm

JohnnyKILLroy wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:
JohnnyKILLroy wrote:I’m curious to see how Poles handles draft picks going forward. He positioned us nicely to win now and we have decent depth everywhere. Just because he’s been the type to flip them for pieces we need via trades so far does that mean he’ll continue to do so going forward.


The 2025 Draft will be the time to bolster the Defense. The Draft will be top heavy with Defensive playmakers at all 3 levels. Very few outstanding QBs. Draft BPA on all 3 levels for depth and the inevitability that we won't be able to retain all our young stars due to the salary cap.


I don’t think he’ll zero in on defensive players necessarily, we’re pretty deep everywhere. I think he’ll let the board come to him. Just as an example I’d rather have a top rated C than a lower rated DB.

I wouldn’t mind keeping out picks in the earlier rounds 1-3 and then trading down with the rest of our picks. I’m very curious to see how Poles handles future drafts.


I do think next offseason he will use both free agency/draft to shore up the Oline/Dlines, and safety. Everything else, will be BPA, imo. Keenan Allen's contract comes off books unless we re-sign him, Nate Davis has a low dead cap hit if we opt out of him and same with DeMarcus Walker, and Shelton's 3 mill comes off books. After the 2025 season, we will have to figure out what to do with D.J. Moore/T.J. Edwards though. However, after 2024-25 season, we could still have cap flexibility. Right now, that cap space is projected to be 7th according to Sportrac.
User avatar
TheJordanRule
Veteran
Posts: 2,807
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 27, 2014

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1927 » by TheJordanRule » Tue May 7, 2024 4:45 pm

Dresden wrote:
fleet wrote:The Sweat deal was premature for me. The kind of thing a young team would add as a final piece more or less to go for the division on a ready team. Which is part of what invited some of the scrutiny. Had it been a deal done in the middle of this season in pursuit of first place, then nobody would really question it to the degree it was questioned. As such, it seemed like a deal for Eberflus to be able to survive easily, which I don’t see as very “smart” team-building, unless he was some kind of coach with special ability to worry about losing


Why would a GM make a trade in order to help his coach save his job, when the GM is the one who decides the fate of the coach? You can't always get the guy you want, when you want him. It's not like walking into a 7-11 and saying "I'll take one starting Edge please".

Poles saw an opportunity and he took it. There's no guarantee the same sort of player would be available this coming season, nor is there a guarantee that if there was, his team would chose to take the Bears offer.

So this kind of nitpicking- saying, "well, it's a decent deal, but it came a season too soon", to me, ignores the reality of how hard it is to make deals, for the kind of player you want, for the price you're willing to pay, and when you want them.

Not to mention that at the time, the Bears pass rush was an embarrassment, and the team was still not completely out of the playoff picture. So just like the year prior with Claypool, Poles saw an area of glaring weakness, and did something to address it.


I would've hated to go into this draft with a higher draft pick if it meant little to no hope for our defense. We were awful before Sweat and ultimately upgraded to the middle-upper pack with that single move. Defense wins championships, and that's what we're aiming for and realistically can achieve for once... championships. Poles is showing us that John Paxson's way of doing things isn't necessarily the best way. We don't have to win every deal on paper. Instead, it's about using assets with vision. GM-ing the Poles way is about being a QB who throws to where the WR will be, not throw to where the WR currently is. While Fleet's alternative strategy might've given us a bigger offensive asset like Joe Alt or Nabers, we would still have no idea whether our defensive guys could play together as a unit, and had to deal with a hole at DE that most likely wouldn't have been addressed through the draft and perceived holes in the secondary. It's two roads that lead to different strengths and weaknesses for our roster. I favor Poles' direction because it revealed that Tyrique is a star with considerable upside, ensured that our defense has half decent pass rushing and gives us a more balanced team overall from the jump. The Clayfool deal blew up Poles' in face, but we're 3 years into the rebuild, and it's safe to say that type of stuff isn't happening often. Our standard for Poles can't be perfection.
Almost Retired
Rookie
Posts: 1,157
And1: 611
Joined: Oct 07, 2020
       

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1928 » by Almost Retired » Tue May 7, 2024 4:57 pm

No GM is going to hit on every move. But when you honestly assess the revival of this franchise since he took over you cannot help but conclude that he has done a magnificent job overall. We were going nowhere fast with aging vets on big contracts and very little draft capital. Now we have a roster that set to compete in our tough Division and with experience and another good Draft next year we should be a contender for even more. I'm jacked up for the coming season.
CROBulls
Junior
Posts: 283
And1: 163
Joined: Jan 11, 2022

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1929 » by CROBulls » Tue May 7, 2024 5:19 pm

TheJordanRule wrote:
Dresden wrote:
fleet wrote:The Sweat deal was premature for me. The kind of thing a young team would add as a final piece more or less to go for the division on a ready team. Which is part of what invited some of the scrutiny. Had it been a deal done in the middle of this season in pursuit of first place, then nobody would really question it to the degree it was questioned. As such, it seemed like a deal for Eberflus to be able to survive easily, which I don’t see as very “smart” team-building, unless he was some kind of coach with special ability to worry about losing


Why would a GM make a trade in order to help his coach save his job, when the GM is the one who decides the fate of the coach? You can't always get the guy you want, when you want him. It's not like walking into a 7-11 and saying "I'll take one starting Edge please".

Poles saw an opportunity and he took it. There's no guarantee the same sort of player would be available this coming season, nor is there a guarantee that if there was, his team would chose to take the Bears offer.

So this kind of nitpicking- saying, "well, it's a decent deal, but it came a season too soon", to me, ignores the reality of how hard it is to make deals, for the kind of player you want, for the price you're willing to pay, and when you want them.

Not to mention that at the time, the Bears pass rush was an embarrassment, and the team was still not completely out of the playoff picture. So just like the year prior with Claypool, Poles saw an area of glaring weakness, and did something to address it.


I would've hated to go into this draft with a higher draft pick if it meant little to no hope for our defense. We were awful before Sweat and ultimately upgraded to the middle-upper pack with that single move. Defense wins championships, and that's what we're aiming for and realistically can achieve for once... championships. Poles is showing us that John Paxson's way of doing things isn't necessarily the best way. We don't have to win every deal on paper. Instead, it's about using assets with vision. GM-ing the Poles way is about being a QB who throws to where the WR will be, not throw to where the WR currently is. While Fleet's alternative strategy might've given us a bigger offensive asset like Joe Alt or Nabers, we would still have no idea whether our defensive guys could play together as a unit, and had to deal with a hole at DE that most likely wouldn't have been addressed through the draft and perceived holes in the secondary. It's two roads that lead to different strengths and weaknesses for our roster. I favor Poles' direction because it revealed that Tyrique is a star with considerable upside, ensured that our defense has half decent pass rushing and gives us a more balanced team overall from the jump. The Clayfool deal blew up Poles' in face, but we're 3 years into the rebuild, and it's safe to say that type of stuff isn't happening often. Our standard for Poles can't be perfection.


Defense wins championship. Yes, but we not gunning for championship this year or next year. Unless I am mistaken? We still rebuilding roster, and we will next year still continue rebuilding our roster. We need to build our offense first because without offense, regardless how good your defense is you not winning anything.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,135
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1930 » by NecessaryEvil » Tue May 7, 2024 5:44 pm

Read on Twitter


Read on Twitter
User avatar
molepharmer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,537
And1: 1,151
Joined: Feb 27, 2002

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1931 » by molepharmer » Tue May 7, 2024 6:37 pm

CHGO podcast one on one with special teams coach Richard Hightower. First ~27min were just basically background on RH. He gets asked about Tory Taylor ~27:30 and is almost giddy at ~28:40 because other teams (via texts) hated the Bears taking Taylor off the board.
TGibson (1/28/17); "..."a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1 to 10 for drama"...What's the worst? "...yelling matches with Thibs, everybody is just going crazy and I'm just sitting there...like, 'Don't call my name please..."
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,871
And1: 32,599
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1932 » by fleet » Tue May 7, 2024 6:40 pm

NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter

Image

If he can read the defense and make an instant decision, with his quick release and arm, the O-line will have a reputation update.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
User avatar
TheJordanRule
Veteran
Posts: 2,807
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 27, 2014

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1933 » by TheJordanRule » Tue May 7, 2024 6:52 pm

molepharmer wrote:CHGO podcast one on one with special teams coach Richard Hightower. First ~27min were just basically background on RH. He gets asked about Tory Taylor ~27:30 and is almost giddy at ~28:40 because other teams (via texts) hated the Bears taking Taylor off the board.


Thank you, Molepharmer! I'm pumped about it, too. Shout out to Dice. I know we disagree about this brother, but earlier you mentioned that our former punter only averaged 5 yards less than one of the best punters in the game. While that's true, it's about hang time with punters, not distance. Anybody can kick it far. The focus should be on whether your punter can give your defense time to run down the field, angle and spin the kick to put the potential punt returner in an awkward position where catching it will be tough, and fair catching it is the only option.
NesimLE
Junior
Posts: 485
And1: 221
Joined: Mar 28, 2010

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1934 » by NesimLE » Tue May 7, 2024 6:56 pm

fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter

Image

If he can read the defense and make an instant decision, with his quick release and arm, the O-line will have a reputation update.

What was going on with Fields/Getsy/Janocko that they couldn't even make this happen in PRACTICE? Like, what were they running?
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,871
And1: 32,599
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1935 » by fleet » Tue May 7, 2024 7:02 pm

Almost Retired wrote:No GM is going to hit on every move. But when you honestly assess the revival of this franchise since he took over you cannot help but conclude that he has done a magnificent job overall. We were going nowhere fast with aging vets on big contracts and very little draft capital. Now we have a roster that set to compete in our tough Division and with experience and another good Draft next year we should be a contender for even more. I'm jacked up for the coming season.

He’s done very well overall. I can’t go magnificent, yet history will certainly judge his job as magnificent. Results seem magnificent. He has been incredibly lucky without which the team’s fortunes might be much less defined. I am satisfied. But he couldn’t repeat this if he tried. Nobody could.
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
User avatar
TheJordanRule
Veteran
Posts: 2,807
And1: 1,278
Joined: Jan 27, 2014

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1936 » by TheJordanRule » Tue May 7, 2024 8:06 pm

fleet wrote:
Almost Retired wrote:No GM is going to hit on every move. But when you honestly assess the revival of this franchise since he took over you cannot help but conclude that he has done a magnificent job overall. We were going nowhere fast with aging vets on big contracts and very little draft capital. Now we have a roster that set to compete in our tough Division and with experience and another good Draft next year we should be a contender for even more. I'm jacked up for the coming season.

He’s done very well overall. I can’t go magnificent, yet history will certainly judge his job as magnificent. Results seem magnificent. He has been incredibly lucky without which the team’s fortunes might be much less defined. I am satisfied. But he couldn’t repeat this if he tried. Nobody could.


Come on, Fleet. We've had plenty of bad GMs who deserved your skepticism, brother. Why would you waste your skepticism on Poles, of all people?
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,135
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1938 » by NecessaryEvil » Tue May 7, 2024 9:16 pm

fleet wrote:
NecessaryEvil wrote:
Read on Twitter

Image

If he can read the defense and make an instant decision, with his quick release and arm, the O-line will have a reputation update.



When Cowherd doubled back on his CW to Chicago comments, CW’s camp said the Oline was better than given credit for. So, I’m with you.
BeatDaCavs420
RealGM
Posts: 27,211
And1: 22,510
Joined: Mar 11, 2012
       

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1939 » by BeatDaCavs420 » Tue May 7, 2024 10:49 pm

fleet wrote:The Sweat deal was premature for me. The kind of thing a young team would add as a final piece more or less to go for the division on a ready team. Which is part of what invited some of the scrutiny. Had it been a deal done in the middle of this season in pursuit of first place, then nobody would really question it to the degree it was questioned. As such, it seemed like a deal for Eberflus to be able to survive easily, which I don’t see as very “smart” team-building, unless he was some kind of coach with special ability to worry about losing

:crazy:
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,199
And1: 1,943
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Bears 2024: 5.0 It's Caleb Williams time 

Post#1940 » by biggestbullsfan » Wed May 8, 2024 12:22 am

Read on Twitter


The bear claw is somehow very cheesy but kindve awesome at the same time lol

Return to Chicago Bulls