madvillian wrote:Sounds like this could be a 2-3 month injury. Just shut him down, trade Zach, and tank. Who the **** cares about a play in spot right now?
AK and the Bulls ‘don’t give a damn except for profits’ ownership group.
Moderators: HomoSapien, Payt10, coldfish, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, dougthonus, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat
madvillian wrote:Sounds like this could be a 2-3 month injury. Just shut him down, trade Zach, and tank. Who the **** cares about a play in spot right now?
MrSparkle wrote:Quick google- uh, he is either missing 2 weeks and coming back playing as immobile as ever, or this shall linger for the rest of the year.
Ice Man wrote:MrSparkle wrote:Quick google- uh, he is either missing 2 weeks and coming back playing as immobile as ever, or this shall linger for the rest of the year.
The Bulls' statement about 2 weeks should be taken entirely literally. In 2 weeks, they will look at his foot again. That does not mean that he will be ready to play, or anything like that. It just means that they will look at his foot.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.
madvillian wrote:Sounds like this could be a 2-3 month injury. Just shut him down, trade Zach, and tank. Who the **** cares about a play in spot right now?
Wingy wrote:Damn it, Thibs!!
They just signed Taj to a 10-day.
madvillian wrote:Sounds like this could be a 2-3 month injury. Just shut him down, trade Zach, and tank. Who the **** cares about a play in spot right now?
League Circles wrote:The idea that we need to brace for a big contract for Patrick should really be put to rest now. I don't care what comparable players may have gotten - it's very unlikely that someone with actual cap space is going to offer Patrick more than the MLE, so if we're smart, that's the MOST we should pay, if we should re-sign him at all.
League Circles wrote:The idea that we need to brace for a big contract for Patrick should really be put to rest now. I don't care what comparable players may have gotten - it's very unlikely that someone with actual cap space is going to offer Patrick more than the MLE, so if we're smart, that's the MOST we should pay, if we should re-sign him at all.
The Explorer wrote:madvillian wrote:Sounds like this could be a 2-3 month injury. Just shut him down, trade Zach, and tank. Who the **** cares about a play in spot right now?
Tank for what though, another Dalen type? By most opinions, this draft is not producing anyone special.
dougthonus wrote:Trying to do some research I ran into a few things that seemed interesting:
1: Saw one article basically referring to Acute Bone Edema as a Bone Bruise. Bone bruises have this super wild timeline of like a month to two years depending.
2: Saw another article about bone marrow edema, not sure if this is the same thing, but "bone edema" always ends up linking to bone marrow edema and acute bone edema is not a common search term except related to Pat Williams. With Bone marrow edema, saw a research paper saying that in athletes 50% can return to form in 6 months and 50% take longer. Saw various articles quoting anywhere from 3 months to 2 years for recovery time.
I'm hoping the fact that the Bulls used 2 weeks as a metric to look at his foot again to assume they think there is a chance he could play in two weeks based on the severity and not that in 2 weeks they'll just see how bad it still is and already know that there's basically no chance he'll play, because if it's the 2nd of those things and they framed it this way, that's an incredible disservice to Pat.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.
dougthonus wrote:Trying to do some research I ran into a few things that seemed interesting:
1: Saw one article basically referring to Acute Bone Edema as a Bone Bruise. Bone bruises have this super wild timeline of like a month to two years depending.
2: Saw another article about bone marrow edema, not sure if this is the same thing, but "bone edema" always ends up linking to bone marrow edema and acute bone edema is not a common search term except related to Pat Williams. With Bone marrow edema, saw a research paper saying that in athletes 50% can return to form in 6 months and 50% take longer. Saw various articles quoting anywhere from 3 months to 2 years for recovery time.
I'm hoping the fact that the Bulls used 2 weeks as a metric to look at his foot again to assume they think there is a chance he could play in two weeks based on the severity and not that in 2 weeks they'll just see how bad it still is and already know that there's basically no chance he'll play, because if it's the 2nd of those things and they framed it this way, that's an incredible disservice to Pat.
ChettheJet wrote:If teams made 10 day instant decisions that changed every 10 days like some people around here the names on the front office doors would be written in chalk.
I want to know who standing 6-9+ can the Bulls sign to a 10 day contract ? Answering my own question by asking, who is healthy and sitting around in shape
Kai Jones
TJ Warren
Isiah Todd
Frank Kaminsky
Justin Jackson
JayMichal Green
Darius Bazley
jc23 wrote:Goran + Lonzo + Zach = the Dragon Ball Z line up.
DASMACKDOWN wrote:Wingy wrote:
Now they’ll rush Craig back and effectively end his career.
We’ll see some more Julian Phillips I suppose.
This has happens too often. I would bet any money you will soon hear stories about how Craig is ahead of schedule and maybe back soon.
The reason why these players want to come back earlier is because they want to fight with their teammates. Caruso did this ALOT in his first season here. He kept coming back early because we also didnt have Lonzo. But it just made him worse and made him sit longer.
You shouldn't rush foot injuries. Craig comes back early, and reaggravate it, then he's done for the year.
If there is ever a year it would be ok to pack it in, its this year. We have our draft pick. Hopefully more with a Zach deal. Then build up some capital on the roster.
kodo wrote:I'm not worried long term, but it probably severely hurts his chances of proving he's worth a $100M contract because there won't be many games left to significantly alter his season averages, and he's been almost identical every season for 4 years now in ppg/rpg/apg.
DuckIII wrote:Bad news for Pat, but could be good news for us with regard to his next contract. Also good to get more floor time for Phillips and Terry. None of these games matter anyway, so more run for the youngters is always a plus.
sco wrote:League Circles wrote:The idea that we need to brace for a big contract for Patrick should really be put to rest now. I don't care what comparable players may have gotten - it's very unlikely that someone with actual cap space is going to offer Patrick more than the MLE, so if we're smart, that's the MOST we should pay, if we should re-sign him at all.
Yeah, there's the silver lining in this. I'd be pretty happy to have him for 3-4 years for <$20M, closer to MLE is even better. I know many here are fixated on the #4 pick, but at this point I look at him as just another young FA with upside.