Image ImageImage Image

Time to get real on Pat's next contract

Moderators: HomoSapien, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, coldfish, RedBulls23, fleet, AshyLarrysDiaper, Michael Jackson, kulaz3000, Ice Man, dougthonus

madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 21,265
And1: 8,728
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#281 » by madvillian » Thu Jan 25, 2024 9:05 pm

Ice Man wrote:From my eye test, Pat was deeply overrated by Stacey/this board (regrettably, very often the same thing) during his first two years in the league. Having big hands like Kawhi did not make him Kawhi. He got beaten off the dribble, a lot, and as with almost all young players struggled at times positionally.

From that same eye test now, I think that he has become a pretty darned good defender. Of course eye tests are kinda crap. But I struggle to find defensive statistics that are any better.


Before his injuries he was the only non center in the top 20 for block and steal rate combined. He's a physical presence and will bang. I just wish he could take that same effort onto the glass more, especially on the offensive glass.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 69,166
And1: 33,869
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#282 » by DuckIII » Thu Jan 25, 2024 9:11 pm

I have no concerns with Pat’s talent, skills and ceiling. I unwaveringly believe he is a relatively high ceiling two way player.

I have significant concerns with his mind.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
Hangtime84
RealGM
Posts: 20,270
And1: 4,394
Joined: Aug 18, 2006
Location: Rogers Park
     

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#283 » by Hangtime84 » Thu Jan 25, 2024 9:12 pm

DuckIII wrote:I have no concerns with Pat’s talent, skills and ceiling. I unwaveringly believe he is a relatively high ceiling two way player.

I have significant concerns with his mind.


Ball handling is my concern with him at the moment
Jcool0 wrote:
aguifs wrote:Do we have a friggin plan?


If the Bulls do, you would be complaining to much to ever hear it.


NBA fan logic we need to trade one of two best players because (Player X) one needs to shine more.
madvillian
RealGM
Posts: 21,265
And1: 8,728
Joined: Dec 23, 2004
Location: Brooklyn

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#284 » by madvillian » Thu Jan 25, 2024 9:16 pm

DuckIII wrote:I have no concerns with Pat’s talent, skills and ceiling. I unwaveringly believe he is a relatively high ceiling two way player.

I have significant concerns with his mind.


You can tell within 30 seconds of watching him if he's engaged that night or not. He was engaged against KD and then the stupid refs took him out of the game with two ticky tack fouls only a superstar gets consistently.
dumbell78 wrote:Random comment....Mikal Bridges stroke is dripping right now in summer league. Carry on.


I'll go ahead and make a sig bet that Mikal is better by RPM this year than Zach.
DuallyNoted
Freshman
Posts: 53
And1: 29
Joined: Apr 11, 2015

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#285 » by DuallyNoted » Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:32 am

Flopper wrote:Does Pat need to play at a lighter weight? Comparing him to Kuminga and Wiggins during last night's game, who are both something close to an archetypical modern forward, he seemed to be carrying a lot more weight in his upper body. The ankle is obviously an issue right now, but he seemed to really struggle with the pace and movement GS was playing at. And earlier in the season he was still getting near flat tires on single leg dunk attempts with relatively fresh legs.

why are all these archtypes struggling or straight garbage?
User avatar
DASMACKDOWN
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 28,997
And1: 14,374
Joined: Nov 01, 2001
Location: Cookin' with Derrick Rose

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#286 » by DASMACKDOWN » Fri Jan 26, 2024 1:45 pm

I can pretty much identify everything he is good and bad at right now.

Pat is an excellent spot up 3pt shooter on the baselines. Career 41% is no joke.
Pat pick and drive pull up jumper is MONEY. That is his shot. That is something he should be taking 5 times a game.
Pat is a good defensive player. It has some flaws, but more times than not, he's good.
Pat is a decent passer to the post. He is unselfish and tries to move the ball.

Thats about it for positives.

Biggest negatives are

Pat is terrible at ball handling. You never know if he will just lose it on drives or bounce it off his foot. Thats on every attempt.
Pat is really bad at finishing. Missed dunks yes, but even when it's not, he totally gets off his shot if there is any traffic.
Pat is really bad at rebounding. It's so bad that he normally only tries to box out. But cannot seemingly box out and grab the rebound.
Pat's motor is highly questionable. He doesn't run hard on fast breaks and normally trails. For rebounds, he generally doesn't make any effort to go for the ball.

So basically, while Pat is still very young, and has a lot of upside, he is still very flawed.

There are obviously things he can and will improve on. The dribbling and rebounding are foundation improvements. That could be done in the offseason. No one ever questions Pat's talent. Not from players or coaches. It's about breaking out of his shell and doing it every night.

With that said though I believe in the young guys. I would offer

A Deni Avdija contract extension. 4 years 55 mil. or only go at the high as Max Strus contract 4 years 63mil.

That is more in line with the Coby and Ayo contracts and all 3 can continue to grow together. That also wouldn't cap kill you in the future. And if Pat makes a Coby like jump next year, its a major win.
The Cult of Personality
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 13,911
And1: 13,060
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#287 » by FriedRise » Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:42 pm

DASMACKDOWN wrote:Pat is an excellent spot up 3pt shooter on the baselines. Career 41% is no joke.
Pat pick and drive pull up jumper is MONEY. That is his shot. That is something he should be taking 5 times a game.
Pat is terrible at ball handling. You never know if he will just lose it on drives or bounce it off his foot. Thats on every attempt.

Pat is really bad at rebounding. It's so bad that he normally only tries to box out. But cannot seemingly box out and grab the rebound.
Pat's motor is highly questionable. He doesn't run hard on fast breaks and normally trails. For rebounds, he generally doesn't make any effort to go for the ball.


I feel like he's in his head too much. Instead of just doing what should be his bread and butter (spot up 3, pull up middy), he gets conflicted when he gets the ball and can't decide if he should do the things he's great at or drive it all the way to the rim (dribbling and finishing - two things he's terrible at).

Then again, if he's just taking jumpers, everyone's gonna call him passive. "If he just goes all the way, he'll probably get fouled." But at this point in the season, he's not gonna get better at ballhandling, so just let it be what it is and spam the things you're good at. Doesn't help the team when you're turning the ball over at near 100% rate when you drive in traffic. Coby had the same issue too earlier in his career, he'll have summers to work on it.

Rebounding - to be a good rebounder, it takes special attention to detail, awareness, motor, reaction time, and effort. Lol, does any of that sound like Pat to you?
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 25,109
And1: 13,773
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#288 » by Ice Man » Fri Jan 26, 2024 2:48 pm

FriedRise wrote:But at this point in the season, he's not gonna get better at ballhandling, so just let it be what it is and spam the things you're good at. Doesn't help the team when you're turning the ball over at near 100% rate when you drive in traffic. Coby had the same issue too earlier in his career, he'll have summers to work on it.


Correct. NBA games aren't for experimentation. They are for doing what you can do best, again and again and again and again. To Pat's credit, he mostly understands that, except for driving too much.

Back in the day, I got into it with Rose fans who were fine with him going 2-8 on threes, all damn season long, because you know he was trying to learn how to get better. That is what the gym is for, folks. Also, the odds strongly are that players who hurt your team by experimenting during games 1) will never get good at that skill, and 2) on the off chance that they do, then they probably will be doing it for another team.

Which of course happened with Derrick. Many seasons later, he had a couple of good 3-point shooting years, and by then he was several teams removed from Chicago.
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 14,344
And1: 5,104
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#289 » by Wingy » Fri Jan 26, 2024 4:14 pm

Ferulci wrote:The team that will give 20M+ to Pat Williams will look like a fool in 2 years, and will try to dump him one year later just like Knicks did with Barrett and Atlanta is trying to do with DeAndre Hunter. It has albatross written all over it.
It's not rocket science: can he become an allstar or not? I would love to hear the argument for it, but nothing he's shown so far indicates Top 40 potential. His ceiling seems to be the 4th best player on a reasonably ok playoff team. Valuable player, but not 25M+ worth, even with increased cap.
If he projects as a role player, you don't overpay. Good front office win on margins, by getting great contract value on role players like Bruce Brown, KCP, Herb Jones or even Derrick White (who is close to an allstar this year). Caruso and White are on great contracts, I don't see any reason to break the bank for a lesser player.

"But, but, if we don't offer 25M+, someone else will"
Fine, let's trade him then ! If Pat is that valuable and a diamond in the rough, then for sure we can get at least some value right ? The team that get him can get a testdrive, work on a contract or match other offers.

So I'm for either trading him before his value plummets (he won't be 22 forever and we're running out of excuses for his passivity), getting him on a Herb Jones-like contract or let him test the free-agency. If he gets a 20M+offer from another team, I wish him the best for his next chapter.


Well written, basically a perfect summary of my Pat world view. Literally down to some of the same player/contract comps I've had in mind (RJ really). I like him as a player, and he's already a good player. I just don't see that upside. If all better options fail, and it comes down to walk or having to match some over-inflated deal, I'm letting him walk.

I've also said, I wouldn't be shocked if all this talk is much ado about nothing. Coby's price surprised me by how low it was, and Pat's could do the same (e.g.- closer to the Deni, Herb level, but with a bump due to being a better shooter). Those guys get $13.5MM AAV. I'd do a ~$18MM AAV and that still might end up being a fairly clear overpay if his growth curve remains as slow as it has been.
jacoby1us
General Manager
Posts: 8,859
And1: 1,613
Joined: Apr 22, 2003
     

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#290 » by jacoby1us » Fri Jan 26, 2024 4:47 pm

DASMACKDOWN wrote:I can pretty much identify everything he is good and bad at right now.

Pat is an excellent spot up 3pt shooter on the baselines. Career 41% is no joke.
Pat pick and drive pull up jumper is MONEY. That is his shot. That is something he should be taking 5 times a game.
Pat is a good defensive player. It has some flaws, but more times than not, he's good.
Pat is a decent passer to the post. He is unselfish and tries to move the ball.

Thats about it for positives.

Biggest negatives are

Pat is terrible at ball handling. You never know if he will just lose it on drives or bounce it off his foot. Thats on every attempt.
Pat is really bad at finishing. Missed dunks yes, but even when it's not, he totally gets off his shot if there is any traffic.
Pat is really bad at rebounding. It's so bad that he normally only tries to box out. But cannot seemingly box out and grab the rebound.
Pat's motor is highly questionable. He doesn't run hard on fast breaks and normally trails. For rebounds, he generally doesn't make any effort to go for the ball.

So basically, while Pat is still very young, and has a lot of upside, he is still very flawed.

There are obviously things he can and will improve on. The dribbling and rebounding are foundation improvements. That could be done in the offseason. No one ever questions Pat's talent. Not from players or coaches. It's about breaking out of his shell and doing it every night.

With that said though I believe in the young guys. I would offer

A Deni Avdija contract extension. [b]4 years 55 mil. or only go at the high as Max Strus contract 4 years 63mil. [/b]

That is more in line with the Coby and Ayo contracts and all 3 can continue to grow together. That also wouldn't cap kill you in the future. And if Pat makes a Coby like jump next year, its a major win.


Great analysis of a player who is still with many flaws.
His inconsistent play is actually a win for us long-term.
#TREADMILLCLUBFAN
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 20,968
And1: 8,333
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#291 » by Stratmaster » Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:01 pm

Ccwatercraft wrote:
madvillian wrote:
Ccwatercraft wrote:
Speaking of running/transition plays.

Why, seriously why does the lead guy almost always just make a beeline to the corner 3 spot, many times not even considering looking over their shoulder for a pass... it seems like a seriously flawed strategy with tons of missed opportunities to break towards the basket for an easy bucket.

I see it 4-5 times a game minimum and it drives me bonkers... if anyone hasn't noticed, look for it, it's there every game.


I wonder if it's a chicken or an egg thing. We don't have a PG that likes to throw it ahead and we also have players conditioned to not look for an easy bucket at the rim. Terry likes to throw it ahead towards the paint, AC does a bit. Ayo doesn't really have that in his game, Demar and Zach certainly don't. Zach I feel likes to run towards the rim in transition but we don't play fast enough to take advantage.


From my POV it seems deliberate, ie: Billy says you run to the corner, so they run to the corner
It has to be. Because Zach does it. Pat does it. Ayo does it. Etc....etc...

Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 20,968
And1: 8,333
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#292 » by Stratmaster » Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:04 pm

DuallyNoted wrote:
Flopper wrote:Does Pat need to play at a lighter weight? Comparing him to Kuminga and Wiggins during last night's game, who are both something close to an archetypical modern forward, he seemed to be carrying a lot more weight in his upper body. The ankle is obviously an issue right now, but he seemed to really struggle with the pace and movement GS was playing at. And earlier in the season he was still getting near flat tires on single leg dunk attempts with relatively fresh legs.

why are all these archtypes struggling or straight garbage?
Duly noted Dually

Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
Stratmaster
RealGM
Posts: 20,968
And1: 8,333
Joined: Oct 02, 2010
       

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#293 » by Stratmaster » Fri Jan 26, 2024 5:12 pm

FriedRise wrote:
DASMACKDOWN wrote:Pat is an excellent spot up 3pt shooter on the baselines. Career 41% is no joke.
Pat pick and drive pull up jumper is MONEY. That is his shot. That is something he should be taking 5 times a game.
Pat is terrible at ball handling. You never know if he will just lose it on drives or bounce it off his foot. Thats on every attempt.

Pat is really bad at rebounding. It's so bad that he normally only tries to box out. But cannot seemingly box out and grab the rebound.
Pat's motor is highly questionable. He doesn't run hard on fast breaks and normally trails. For rebounds, he generally doesn't make any effort to go for the ball.


I feel like he's in his head too much. Instead of just doing what should be his bread and butter (spot up 3, pull up middy), he gets conflicted when he gets the ball and can't decide if he should do the things he's great at or drive it all the way to the rim (dribbling and finishing - two things he's terrible at).

Then again, if he's just taking jumpers, everyone's gonna call him passive. "If he just goes all the way, he'll probably get fouled." But at this point in the season, he's not gonna get better at ballhandling, so just let it be what it is and spam the things you're good at. Doesn't help the team when you're turning the ball over at near 100% rate when you drive in traffic. Coby had the same issue too earlier in his career, he'll have summers to work on it.

Rebounding - to be a good rebounder, it takes special attention to detail, awareness, motor, reaction time, and effort. Lol, does any of that sound like Pat to you?
The problem with the pull up middy, is that it's not always there. As was mentioned, if Pat is contested in any way he crumbles.

Basically, he is an open 3 and D guy. Sadly, a 3 and D forward who can't rebound.

When Pat has an open shot, I have a high level of confidence it will go in. If he isn't wide open or has to make a move, I have a high level of confidence something very bad will happen.

Defensively, I agree with some others that he is overrated; but he is solid. A very good defender.

Sent from my SM-S911U using RealGM mobile app
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 25,109
And1: 13,773
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#294 » by Ice Man » Fri Jan 26, 2024 6:07 pm

jacoby1us wrote:His inconsistent play is actually a win for us long-term.


That sentence should be used in a dictionary to illustrate the meaning of the word "optimism."
jacoby1us
General Manager
Posts: 8,859
And1: 1,613
Joined: Apr 22, 2003
     

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#295 » by jacoby1us » Fri Jan 26, 2024 7:35 pm

Ice Man wrote:
jacoby1us wrote:His inconsistent play is actually a win for us long-term.


That sentence should be used in a dictionary to illustrate the meaning of the word "optimism."


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
#TREADMILLCLUBFAN
User avatar
MikeDC
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,917
Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Location: DC Area

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#296 » by MikeDC » Sat Jan 27, 2024 3:06 pm

If the Pistons truly liked and still like Pat, I'd willingly trade him for Ausar or Cade in addition to a Lavine for Bogdan/Stewart deal.
I dont' think I'd trade him for Ivey though, just because I'm not very high on Ivey. Maybe Ivey and a reasonable pick?

Pat's basically in the spot where I think he's probably going to get a contract that won't kill us, but also won't be great. If we could make that move, we should.
GoBlue72391
General Manager
Posts: 9,270
And1: 5,702
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#297 » by GoBlue72391 » Sat Jan 27, 2024 7:59 pm

I think it's becoming more and more obvious that the correct move regarding Pat is to trade him and address the PF position with a different player, whether that's via trade, FA, or draft and let some other team deal with Pat's extension.
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 14,344
And1: 5,104
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#298 » by Wingy » Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:02 pm

GoBlue72391 wrote:I think it's becoming more and more obvious that the correct move regarding Pat is to trade him and address the PF position with a different player, whether that's via trade, FA, or draft and let some other team deal with Pat's extension.


Right move for you, but won’t be for AK. Like most, he was happy to toss the other guy’s players to the curb. His own, not so much. See Vuc. He doesn’t get the sunk cost fallacy.

At least with Pat it has a much greater chance of working out simply due to player age.
User avatar
dougthonus
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 55,867
And1: 15,966
Joined: Dec 22, 2004
Contact:
 

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#299 » by dougthonus » Sat Jan 27, 2024 8:55 pm

MikeDC wrote:If the Pistons truly liked and still like Pat, I'd willingly trade him for Ausar or Cade in addition to a Lavine for Bogdan/Stewart deal.
I dont' think I'd trade him for Ivey though, just because I'm not very high on Ivey. Maybe Ivey and a reasonable pick?

Pat's basically in the spot where I think he's probably going to get a contract that won't kill us, but also won't be great. If we could make that move, we should.


I can't imagine the Pistons liking Pat more than any of those guys. Especially as a pending FA.
http://linktr.ee/bullsbeat - links to the bullsbeat podcast
@doug_thonus on twitter
User avatar
MikeDC
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,917
Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Location: DC Area

Re: Time to get real on Pat's next contract 

Post#300 » by MikeDC » Sat Jan 27, 2024 9:49 pm

dougthonus wrote:
MikeDC wrote:If the Pistons truly liked and still like Pat, I'd willingly trade him for Ausar or Cade in addition to a Lavine for Bogdan/Stewart deal.
I dont' think I'd trade him for Ivey though, just because I'm not very high on Ivey. Maybe Ivey and a reasonable pick?

Pat's basically in the spot where I think he's probably going to get a contract that won't kill us, but also won't be great. If we could make that move, we should.


I can't imagine the Pistons liking Pat more than any of those guys. Especially as a pending FA.


I wouldnt either, but they’re shopping around looking at Miles Bridges who will be a UFA and has a ton of baggage that Pat doesnt. Also, a sensible team in their position would have no interest in Zach.

But theyre not in that position because they do what makes sense.

Return to Chicago Bulls