Image ImageImage Image

Bears 2024 2.0

Moderators: HomoSapien, Michael Jackson, kulaz3000, dougthonus, Ice Man, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, coldfish, RedBulls23, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

Choose the quarterback

Caleb Williams
47
71%
Jayden Daniels
1
2%
Drake Maye
2
3%
Justin Fields
13
20%
Michael Penix
2
3%
Other
1
2%
 
Total votes: 66

_txchilibowl_
Starter
Posts: 2,115
And1: 2,186
Joined: Aug 17, 2017
     

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#41 » by _txchilibowl_ » Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:31 am

Jeffster81 wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:
jmajew wrote:If we trade Fields I'd be quite happy if we could do Fields for Bijan straight up. Seems like a pretty good 1 for 1 deal for both teams.

ATL would laugh us off the phone if I’m being completely honest.


RBs have very little value, trade or not. Bears would laugh at Fields for Bijan.



So little value that they used the 8th pick to draft him just last year? That doesn't add up.
Betta Bulleavit
Head Coach
Posts: 7,303
And1: 2,634
Joined: Oct 29, 2004
       

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#42 » by Betta Bulleavit » Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:33 am

Jeffster81 wrote:
Betta Bulleavit wrote:
jmajew wrote:If we trade Fields I'd be quite happy if we could do Fields for Bijan straight up. Seems like a pretty good 1 for 1 deal for both teams.

ATL would laugh us off the phone if I’m being completely honest.


RBs have very little value, trade or not. Bears would laugh at Fields for Bijan.

In general, you’re right. RBs aren’t a valuable as other positions. However, this is the one situation where the RB has more value because he’s young and isn’t due to get paid more anytime soon. So from a trade standpoint, Bijan is every bit as valuable as Fields and more so once you consider that they’d have to pay Fields. So, no…ATL isn’t doing that. And I’m a Fields fan.
biggestbullsfan
RealGM
Posts: 12,202
And1: 1,943
Joined: Apr 28, 2004
     

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#43 » by biggestbullsfan » Tue Jan 30, 2024 6:03 am

Read on Twitter


This is pretty wild…
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,404
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#44 » by heir_jordan22 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 6:20 am

Dresden wrote:
heir_jordan22 wrote:
fleet wrote:Pocket time (time spent in pocket between the snap and the throw/pressure in the pocket) was 2.4 seconds for Murray, 2.5 for Mahomes, FWIW. Those are typical and unremarkable numbers from what I understand. Quality of O-line probably factors in. Anyway.



I agree with that to an extent if you’re talking about the ball release from the hand. Kyler’s seems slower to me than Mahomes and Caleb. Calebs looks pretty quick. And the way I heard it, shorter quarterbacks will often buy a better read of the field by getting further away from the of scrimmage.

Digging into this too deeply, It’s in the eye of the beholder perhaps.

Mahomes throws backhand passes, underhand tosses, random flicks, passes with has off hand - all kinds of nonsense that is unacceptable, except he completes those at an uncanny rate. Nobody else does that. Nobody else can throw a 50 yard bomb with a true flick of the wrist when defenders make contact with their arm. We haven't seen it. Not with Caleb Williams, not with Kyler Murray, not with Zach Wilson.


Those passes looked a lot better when he had Tyreek Hill and some of the other receivers he's had there in years past. He only managed 17 pts v. BAL, and was only 6th in the league in yards this year, and 14th in QBR. I'm not saying he's not amazing, but he's looked a lot more human this year without such great receivers.

I agree. Obviously Mahomes is one of the greatest QBs ever already. But he was setup for success by having one of the greatest offensive minds teaching him, and he's been throwing to one of the greatest TEs of all time, and he had the best WR. All young QBs suck when they're setup for failure early. I just want to see this franchise actually build a an organization that can sustain success. Williams could be the next most talented guy, but if we draft him and don't build properly then he'll suck here too.
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 20,367
And1: 18,676
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#45 » by TheGOATRises007 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:44 am

Peelboy wrote:Draft Caleb (No independent knowledge, but basically every scout/FO type I read from says the same - he's far and away the best QB prospect in a while. "Generational" is hard to use in general, but better than any of the QBs in the past few years and I've seen things saying as a prospect on the level of Manning/Luck when they came out and better than Burrow.

In my dream world, Daniels underwhelms and you can package 9+Fields to move up to 3, I'd even throw in say the Bears #2 next year. Pair Harrison w Caleb. Otherwise, deal Justin to Atlanta for a 2+3 and draft one of Nabers/Odunze/Bowers.

With the Atl 2, and 2 3d round picks, I focus on OT, C, DE. Depth at CB, S, LB in later rounds.

FA I also grab a C. Resign Jaylon. Sign a S or rework EJax's deal. Cut Patrick/Whitehair. If you can do it at a decent price, resign Mooney

DJ-Odunze/Bowers-Mooney-Scott-Kmet, Roschon/Herbert at RB, Caleb at QB.
OL of say Braxton-Teven-Rookie/FA-Davis/Rookie-Wright.

DL of Sweat-Dexter-Billings-Walker with Jones/Pickens/rookie in rotation.
LB's stay Edwards-Edmunds-Sanborn
DBs of Jaylon-Tyrique-Kyler-Brisker-EJax/FA

All doable and should be a playoff team with a solid OC which it seems like they have.


Any links to this?
User avatar
TheGOATRises007
RealGM
Posts: 20,367
And1: 18,676
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
         

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#46 » by TheGOATRises007 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 9:49 am

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is pretty wild…


Would be funny since the org passed up on Mahomes to then finally draft a better version of him :lol:

I think people should pump the brakes on Mahomes comparisons. Up to age 28 for NFL quarterbacks, he's got the best resume of all-time. If you can get half that resume with Williams, we should be ecstatic.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,135
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#47 » by NecessaryEvil » Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:50 pm

That account never lists sources, it just says stuff. I wouldn’t go by that.
User avatar
nomorezorro
RealGM
Posts: 12,179
And1: 8,935
Joined: Jun 22, 2006
Location: appropriately compensated

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#48 » by nomorezorro » Tue Jan 30, 2024 1:57 pm

yeah that is 100% made up and i am begging everyone to realize that "nfl notifications" on twitter dot com is not a legitimate source of news
WookieOnRitalin wrote:Game 1. It's where the series is truly 0-0.
User avatar
Bulls69
Head Coach
Posts: 6,497
And1: 417
Joined: Jul 13, 2002
Location: LA via Chicago

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#49 » by Bulls69 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:27 pm

JockItch43 wrote:
_txchilibowl_ wrote:
JockItch43 wrote:
Oof :-?



Sorry you don't see it yet. Give it some time.



I watched 3 full games of his this past season to get a better idea beyond “expert” takes and highlight reels. His “cannon” is overrated, arm strength isn’t bad but isn’t anything special. I see the frame and some of the tools, but the talent doesn’t jump off the screen like with some players. Nothing wowed me, his accuracy was mediocre, and even his deep balls, which are supposedly a strength, were under thrown where the receiver made an adjustment to complete the pass.

I see some potential as a prospect and he is young with room to improve, but do not see his ceiling as being elite in the league. And if I’m drafting a guy with a top 3 pick, that’s the bar… average to decent starter is not a win.

I have seen several of Drake Mays games I have never been a big fan of his game .
Knicksgod wrote: I know LeBron won't go to Chicago. There could be another surprise team, but if he leaves Cleveland, then teaming with Bosh and Gallo in NYC is a likely scenario.
User avatar
NecessaryEvil
General Manager
Posts: 9,510
And1: 7,135
Joined: Jun 12, 2014
 

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#50 » by NecessaryEvil » Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:37 pm

Read on Twitter
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,938
And1: 32,644
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#51 » by fleet » Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:45 pm

biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is pretty wild…

I don’t trust this website. OTOH I have read anonymous comments referencing scouts that said “A more refined Mahomes” “Mahomes with a better arm”

Those are incredible comments. Was it this website? Take it with a grain of salt..
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
NesimLE
Junior
Posts: 485
And1: 221
Joined: Mar 28, 2010

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#52 » by NesimLE » Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:52 pm

fleet wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is pretty wild…

I don’t trust this website. OTOH I have read anonymous comments referencing scouts that said “A more refined Mahomes” “Mahomes with a better arm”


Those are incredible comments. Was it this website? Take it with a grain of salt.

With scouts that have takes like that, it's not quite as surprising that 1st round QBs get overdrafted and bust half the time...could you imagine if someone said a prospect was "Michael Jordan with better body control" or "Magic with better vision?" No one would take that guy seriously, but NFL scouts/pundits get away with it apparently lol
fleet
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 64,938
And1: 32,644
Joined: Dec 23, 2002
 

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#53 » by fleet » Tue Jan 30, 2024 2:56 pm

NesimLE wrote:
fleet wrote:
biggestbullsfan wrote:
Read on Twitter


This is pretty wild…

I don’t trust this website. OTOH I have read anonymous comments referencing scouts that said “A more refined Mahomes” “Mahomes with a better arm”


Those are incredible comments. Was it this website? Take it with a grain of salt.

With scouts that have takes like that, it's not quite as surprising that 1st round QBs get overdrafted and bust half the time...could you imagine if someone said a prospect was "Michael Jordan with better body control" or "Magic with better vision?" No one would take that guy seriously, but NFL scouts/pundits get away with it apparently lol


They can’t make those comments compared to the NFL Mahomes. I would think the context was missing, if the comments are even real. As a prospect comparison at best
Brad Biggs wrote:Fields was in the bottom third of the league in too many key statistical metrics for the Bears to commit to the idea of trading down from the first pick for a bundle of future assets and then building around him.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,404
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#54 » by heir_jordan22 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:17 pm

fleet wrote:
NesimLE wrote:
fleet wrote:I don’t trust this website. OTOH I have read anonymous comments referencing scouts that said “A more refined Mahomes” “Mahomes with a better arm”


Those are incredible comments. Was it this website? Take it with a grain of salt.

With scouts that have takes like that, it's not quite as surprising that 1st round QBs get overdrafted and bust half the time...could you imagine if someone said a prospect was "Michael Jordan with better body control" or "Magic with better vision?" No one would take that guy seriously, but NFL scouts/pundits get away with it apparently lol


They can’t make those comments compared to the NFL Mahomes. I would think the context was missing, if the comments are even real. As a prospect comparison at best

Calling back to an earlier exchange, I think if you're comparing recent prospects, then the Williams to Murray comparison is by far the most complete comparison. They played under the same coach, in the same system, with similar playing styles and attributes. The only major difference is their height and Williams' strength. Murray was highly regarded. People were saying he would be a perfect prospect if he wasn't 5'10" with short arms and a small frame. He was a much more highly touted prospect than Mahomes. In this regard, I think Williams is an amazing prospect. I do not think he will step in and have a CJ Stroud year, unless he has a good group of weapons around him, given his issues with hitting open receivers early.
Peelboy
Starter
Posts: 2,032
And1: 1,014
Joined: Jun 23, 2007

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#55 » by Peelboy » Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:27 pm

TheGOATRises007 wrote:
Peelboy wrote:Draft Caleb (No independent knowledge, but basically every scout/FO type I read from says the same - he's far and away the best QB prospect in a while. "Generational" is hard to use in general, but better than any of the QBs in the past few years and I've seen things saying as a prospect on the level of Manning/Luck when they came out and better than Burrow.

In my dream world, Daniels underwhelms and you can package 9+Fields to move up to 3, I'd even throw in say the Bears #2 next year. Pair Harrison w Caleb. Otherwise, deal Justin to Atlanta for a 2+3 and draft one of Nabers/Odunze/Bowers.

With the Atl 2, and 2 3d round picks, I focus on OT, C, DE. Depth at CB, S, LB in later rounds.

FA I also grab a C. Resign Jaylon. Sign a S or rework EJax's deal. Cut Patrick/Whitehair. If you can do it at a decent price, resign Mooney

DJ-Odunze/Bowers-Mooney-Scott-Kmet, Roschon/Herbert at RB, Caleb at QB.
OL of say Braxton-Teven-Rookie/FA-Davis/Rookie-Wright.

DL of Sweat-Dexter-Billings-Walker with Jones/Pickens/rookie in rotation.
LB's stay Edwards-Edmunds-Sanborn
DBs of Jaylon-Tyrique-Kyler-Brisker-EJax/FA

All doable and should be a playoff team with a solid OC which it seems like they have.


Any links to this?


[url]
Read on Twitter
?s=20[/url]

[url]
Read on Twitter
?s=20[/url]

[url]
Read on Twitter
?s=20[/url]

I can't vouch for any of those, but I see a lot more of those kinds of comments from FO/scout types than I do concerns about being a bust. Even if he's not at that level, just a top 5-10 QB in the league, that's huge for the Bears. I love Fields and think that the Bears completely mismanaged him, but that's where we are. He may well end up a very good QB, but at this point that's at least as much of a question mark as Caleb seems to be and actually seems a bigger question mark, plus the upside of Caleb seems a lot higher (and the resetting the contract clock thing, although that's partially offset by the pick haul you'd get from trading the #1).

I'd love to see Marv on the Bears, and most of the year I was rooting for Marv+Fields. But Justin just didn't do enough and Caleb seems to be that good a prospect.
patryk7754
General Manager
Posts: 7,587
And1: 1,131
Joined: Jan 22, 2012

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#56 » by patryk7754 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:36 pm

I don't think a Gm saying that he'd draft Williams over Elway, Manning, or Burrow is an example of just how great Williams is but how people tend to overhype prospects. Those three were clearly better prospects than Williams. But I love the Mahomes comparisons - it just means we'll get so much more when we trade the 1st pick.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,404
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#57 » by heir_jordan22 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:40 pm

If the Commanders are desperate to get Caleb Williams there would be some interesting possibilities. They may want to trade Howell. They have Cosmi, Allen, Payne, and McClaurin, who would all be helpfull to us.

For Bryce Young we got:
DJ Moore (approx. value of a 1st + 2nd round pick)
No. 9
No 61
2024 1st
2025 2nd
So basically two 1s and two 2s in 2023, plus a future 1 and 2.

For Williams we should get a player(s) worth a 1 and 2, a 1 and 2 this year, plus future 1 and 2. I would say that's the minimum even if we only trade one spot because Williams is a better prospect.

2, 36, 2025 1, 2026 2, G Sam Cosmi, QB Sam Howell.
User avatar
CjayC
RealGM
Posts: 11,524
And1: 1,143
Joined: Mar 02, 2005
Location: Hoiball
   

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#58 » by CjayC » Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:46 pm

Read on Twitter


If all is true then a lot of people are gonna want to be here to either coach or play with Williams. We should be pretty well off, but they really need to nail this offseason.
heir_jordan22
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,404
And1: 325
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#59 » by heir_jordan22 » Tue Jan 30, 2024 4:52 pm

Peelboy wrote:
Read on Twitter


Spielman was in charge of the decision to draft Christian Ponder with the 12th pick in 2011.
https://www.twincities.com/2022/01/10/best-worst-vikings-draft-picks-of-rick-spielmans-tenure/

The best qb they drafted during his 15 years as VP of Player Personnel and GM was Teddy Bridgewater. Derek Carr and Jimmy Garoppolo were both picked after Bridgewater that year (marginal upgrades).
panthermark
RealGM
Posts: 20,969
And1: 3,522
Joined: Mar 15, 2010
Location: Undisclosed: MJ's shadow could be lurking....
         

Re: Bears 2024 2.0 

Post#60 » by panthermark » Tue Jan 30, 2024 5:31 pm

It sucks, but the truth hurts. (Yes, we got called out).



Of course, we need to find our Favre before we can go this route.
Jealousy is a sickness.......get well soon....

Return to Chicago Bulls