Dan Z wrote:coldfish wrote:MalagaBulls wrote:That's not what Arturas thinks.
One of the things I found really offensive about this whole thing is that Chicago is more profitable by keeping him on the roster and getting the insurance money than medically retiring him and signing other players.
I wonder how much that plays into all of this.
I'd like to think that's not the case, but you never know with Bulls ownership.
One issue with medically retiring him is that it might be difficult to do. Lonzo got surgery and by all accounts has said he'll come back. Will he? Who knows? I think that even if he comes back he won't be the same player and that the Bulls should move on.
We had a longer debate earlier in the thread about this topic, but it's definitely not an open/shut question.
The flip side is, the only down side to trying is that you have to waive him to do so. Which means that by not trying you think one of a few things:
1: There's some chance he can come back, because even if he comes back for someone else, the money gets put back on your books regardless of his productivity, so you'd rather be the team he comes back for even if its at a lower level.
2: You think there is some arbitrage you can do in the final year of his deal as a cash saving move due to the insurance if he's still out (certainly possible, but it can't be used to cut a luxury tax bill which would be the biggest benefit if it were possible)
3: You really just want to save the cash yourself
Granted, your rationale doesn't have to be explicitly in one camp. You could figure the risk of #1 is pretty high so you might as well keep him and then you can attempt #2 and worst case you end up in boat #3.
You can also try again this summer, though it becomes a timing issue where you probably won't get approved fast enough to effectively use the space.