Image ImageImage Image

Bulls Trade Rumors Only

Moderators: HomoSapien, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN

Guru
Starter
Posts: 2,035
And1: 218
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1021 » by Guru » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:34 pm

SfBull wrote:
Guru wrote:Listened to a lot of angry podcasts on my walk. I don't get it. People are frustrated we didn't do anything. But there aren't any specifics.

From what I can tell they would have traded Caruso for Kaminga but the Warriors wanted picks back?
They would have probably done the Lavine trade to the Pistons and were still going after Bojan even after LaVine went down.

Deals didn't materialize.

Bad deals are worse than stagnation.

A package with DeMar and Pat (both with expiring contracts) could have brought us a younger player and maybe a FRP next draft.There were alternatives,AK apparently didn't want to explore them.
We'll run the same **** again next season with DDR and PW with newer and more expensive contracts.
We're screwed.


From who? Did you hear any rumors about this at all?

We just saw Coby show up after his 2nd deal, why couldn't Pat?
We got mad we traded Carter.....but now we want to trade Pat?

There is all emotion and no logic in these trade ideas.
SfBull
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 1,700
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
       

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1022 » by SfBull » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:36 pm

Red8911 wrote:Glad that Demar and AC didnt get traded. They both have been awesome here. Demar has earned a new extension and both sides seem to want the same thing but hopefully Demar takes a bit of a pay cut mostly because of his age.

I was only disappointed that Zach and Lonzo are still on the roster. AK waited too damn long and then at the end failed to trade Zach.He should have taken care of this immediately after Zach made it known that he wants out and should have stopped playing him to avoid injury.He handled this totally wrong. I really wonder what he turned down while looking for a “great” deal.

On Drummond I didn’t mind if he got moved but also glad they didn’t do something stpd like leave this team with one center. He has been playing on a different level this season so better off that he stayed.

I’m also cool with AK wanting to compete, I agree with him. Despite the pressure from a few fans,media and other teams to sell everyone he stuck to his plan and said fk you all! Have to respect that but also he should have made some type of move to improve the roster, I’m sure there was something he could have done.

Yes,fk y all , keeping the things as they are making another Play in Tournament spot and losing on the first or second game.
SfBull
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 1,700
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
       

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1023 » by SfBull » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:39 pm

Guru wrote:
SfBull wrote:
Guru wrote:Listened to a lot of angry podcasts on my walk. I don't get it. People are frustrated we didn't do anything. But there aren't any specifics.

From what I can tell they would have traded Caruso for Kaminga but the Warriors wanted picks back?
They would have probably done the Lavine trade to the Pistons and were still going after Bojan even after LaVine went down.

Deals didn't materialize.

Bad deals are worse than stagnation.

A package with DeMar and Pat (both with expiring contracts) could have brought us a younger player and maybe a FRP next draft.There were alternatives,AK apparently didn't want to explore them.
We'll run the same **** again next season with DDR and PW with newer and more expensive contracts.
We're screwed.


From who? Did you hear any rumors about this at all?

We just saw Coby show up after his 2nd deal, why couldn't Pat?
We got mad we traded Carter.....but now we want to trade Pat?

There is all emotion and no logic in these trade ideas.

You are waiting too long for Pat's development.
Guru
Starter
Posts: 2,035
And1: 218
Joined: Oct 29, 2001

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1024 » by Guru » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:45 pm

He is 22
SfBull
Head Coach
Posts: 7,434
And1: 1,700
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
       

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1025 » by SfBull » Sat Feb 10, 2024 9:51 pm

Guru wrote:He is 22

And with 25 he'll be an All Star?
Too much patience and money to be wasted with a role player.
GoBlue72391
General Manager
Posts: 9,270
And1: 5,702
Joined: Oct 26, 2009
     

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1026 » by GoBlue72391 » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:22 am

Guru wrote:
SfBull wrote:
Guru wrote:Listened to a lot of angry podcasts on my walk. I don't get it. People are frustrated we didn't do anything. But there aren't any specifics.

From what I can tell they would have traded Caruso for Kaminga but the Warriors wanted picks back?
They would have probably done the Lavine trade to the Pistons and were still going after Bojan even after LaVine went down.

Deals didn't materialize.

Bad deals are worse than stagnation.

A package with DeMar and Pat (both with expiring contracts) could have brought us a younger player and maybe a FRP next draft.There were alternatives,AK apparently didn't want to explore them.
We'll run the same **** again next season with DDR and PW with newer and more expensive contracts.
We're screwed.


From who? Did you hear any rumors about this at all?

We just saw Coby show up after his 2nd deal, why couldn't Pat?
We got mad we traded Carter.....but now we want to trade Pat?

There is all emotion and no logic in these trade ideas.
Pat would need a lobotomy or brain transplant in order to break out like Coby.
Muzbar
Starter
Posts: 2,176
And1: 1,445
Joined: Apr 03, 2002
Location: Australia
Contact:
 

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1027 » by Muzbar » Sun Feb 11, 2024 12:25 am

In the end, the title of this thread was extremely accurate.

It was just Bulls trade rumors only (no matter how few).
Go Bulls... I guess!? Right!?
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 13,910
And1: 13,060
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1028 » by FriedRise » Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:37 pm

Read on Twitter
jnrjr79
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,381
And1: 2,460
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1029 » by jnrjr79 » Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:42 pm

FriedRise wrote:
Read on Twitter



Unreal.
User avatar
ChiefILL53
Starter
Posts: 2,278
And1: 830
Joined: Jun 15, 2013
       

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1030 » by ChiefILL53 » Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:04 pm

and we need 2nds too cuz we've basically traded them all lol
jc23 wrote:Goran + Lonzo + Zach = the Dragon Ball Z line up.
jump
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,003
And1: 1,422
Joined: Jun 15, 2001

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1031 » by jump » Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:19 pm

I’d rather have Drummond now and possibly for the next couple years than three 2nds. He’s a value contract and probably won’t be expensive next contract.
greenwing
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,906
And1: 442
Joined: Jul 14, 2008

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1032 » by greenwing » Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:52 pm

jnrjr79 wrote:
FriedRise wrote:
Read on Twitter



Unreal.


Would rather try to keep Drummond after this season than have three late second round picks.
DropStep
Junior
Posts: 283
And1: 158
Joined: Feb 28, 2009

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1033 » by DropStep » Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:02 pm

Assuming three seconds in that scenario equals maybe a low first rounder, it seems about right. But we need size so badly I don't think we could take it. Also, 76ers second rounders are likely to be in the 50s for the next few years.

It seems like the value of seconds has gone completely haywire recently. They are wanted, but it also seems like you may need to include 4 or 5 of them to gain any headway in a trade. If you proposed sending 5 to someone a decade ago, I'm not sure they'd even know how to evaluate that offer, and they may have just laughed you off. Even today, I'm not sure all teams are on the same wavelength yet as to what they are worth. At least some teams seem to have a defined process to value them (a chart, or an equation) for modern trades - I'd love to see an NBA pick points value chart that is derived from some serious data analysis, similar to the NFL ones by Rich Hill, RJ White and others, but teams are probably still holding theirs as private IP. The ones I just googled seem sketchy. Nerds, get to it.
jnrjr79
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,381
And1: 2,460
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1034 » by jnrjr79 » Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:02 pm

greenwing wrote:
jnrjr79 wrote:
FriedRise wrote:
Read on Twitter



Unreal.


Would rather try to keep Drummond after this season than have three late second round picks.


The Bulls are a treadmill team headed nowhere. Retaining Drummond when you could start restocking the empty draft pick cabinet makes no sense. Drummond is very likely to be more expensive on his next deal, as well, with the Bulls already facing serious luxury tax concerns next season if they re-sign PWill and DeRozan. So there's a huge chance Drummond just walks and keeping him did what, exactly? Kept them in the play-in?
User avatar
FriedRise
RealGM
Posts: 13,910
And1: 13,060
Joined: Jan 13, 2015
Location: Chicago
 

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1035 » by FriedRise » Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:25 pm

Those 2nds probably won’t ever be as good as Drummond, but they could’ve been used other ways - like for example, as a sweetener to move off of Zach’s contract that would’ve allowed you to reset this roster.
kodo
RealGM
Posts: 18,683
And1: 13,322
Joined: Oct 10, 2006
Location: Northshore Burbs
 

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1036 » by kodo » Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:40 pm

We don't need sweeteners to move Lavine. Look at the hard evidence:
- AK was offered a king's ransom for Caruso (whatever that was) last deadline, no deal
- AK was offered Moody plus pick(s) for Caruso this deadline, no deal
- AK was offered 3 picks for our league min, backup Center. No DEAL.

It's obvious that there were offers for Zach most of us would have considered fair for Lavine, and AK would have rejected them.
Charlesareed
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,598
And1: 752
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
         

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1037 » by Charlesareed » Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:41 pm

FriedRise wrote:Those 2nds probably won’t ever be as good as Drummond, but they could’ve been used other ways - like for example, as a sweetener to move off of Zach’s contract that would’ve allowed you to reset this roster.



Exactly that’s why you do the trade 10/10 it’s gonna cost the move Zach and 3 srps Carter & terry would get it done
Chicago Raised me
sco
RealGM
Posts: 23,709
And1: 7,681
Joined: Sep 22, 2003
Location: Virtually Everywhere!

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1038 » by sco » Fri Feb 16, 2024 7:46 pm

FriedRise wrote:Those 2nds probably won’t ever be as good as Drummond, but they could’ve been used other ways - like for example, as a sweetener to move off of Zach’s contract that would’ve allowed you to reset this roster.

Yeah, 3 wrongs don't make a right. 2nd rounders can be bought, not sure I'd ever give up a rotation level player like AD for a handful of magic beans.
:clap:
Peelboy
Starter
Posts: 2,032
And1: 1,014
Joined: Jun 23, 2007

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1039 » by Peelboy » Fri Feb 16, 2024 8:30 pm

FriedRise wrote:
Read on Twitter



Absolute ineptitude. Alas wholly consistent with everything else they've done in which basically EVERY big decision has ended up a disaster, and their attitude has been "all we ever want is to be on the fringe of the playoffs, and we won't jeopardize that even if it gives us a better shot at a title."

Image
"Miss us?"
Yes. I miss GarPax, I miss them so much.
jnrjr79
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,381
And1: 2,460
Joined: May 27, 2003
Location: Chicago

Re: Bulls Trade Rumors Only 

Post#1040 » by jnrjr79 » Fri Feb 16, 2024 8:32 pm

kodo wrote:We don't need sweeteners to move Lavine. Look at the hard evidence:
- AK was offered a king's ransom for Caruso (whatever that was) last deadline, no deal
- AK was offered Moody plus pick(s) for Caruso this deadline, no deal
- AK was offered 3 picks for our league min, backup Center. No DEAL.

It's obvious that there were offers for Zach most of us would have considered fair for Lavine, and AK would have rejected them.


No, it's not obvious.

Zach is a holdover from the prior regime and AK has never seen as invested in him as in other players. Absent his injury, I assume they would have made efforts to get him off the roster. There is no evidence that, at this point, AK wants him around.

Return to Chicago Bulls