Page 11 of 14

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:50 pm
by magicfan4life05
does anyone know what happened in that meeting with d'antoni and the bulls owner?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:52 pm
by Chi Dynasty12
Wow... so many missed oppurtunities by Paxson. This really let me down.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:53 pm
by Magilla_Gorilla
magicfan4life05 wrote:does anyone know what happened in that meeting with d'antoni and the bulls owner?



The Sun Times is reporting that they met Friday, and that after the meeting Reinsdorf was not prepared to offer Dan Tony a contract.




So whoever coaches the Bulls next better hope to god that he has a better record next season than the Knicks.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:57 pm
by TB#1
Chi Dynasty12 wrote:Wow... so many missed oppurtunities by Paxson. This really let me down.


Well, this is what I'm trying to understand. There is a lot of profanity laden anger being expressed over not "landing" The Chip, but before all the media hullabaloo about the Bulls interviewing him, the discussion about Porn Stache Mike as a potential Bulls coach was lukewarm, at best.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 10:57 pm
by Chi Dynasty12
Magilla_Gorilla wrote:The Sun Times is reporting that they met Friday, and that after the meeting Reinsdorf was not prepared to offer Dan Tony a contract.


Way to be prepared JR

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:00 pm
by meatball sub
IMO you guys lucked out by not getting D'Antoni. Defense wins championships.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:02 pm
by derf
Hopefully this story will make the national media. The Bulls are probably the most profitable team in professional sports yet continue to refuse to use their financial advantage to improve the product. The team is a joke but not everyone is in on it yet.

I hate being right all the time about this, I keep hoping Ownership will make me look bad.

I'm not losing too much sleep over that one though. :D

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:02 pm
by fleet
TB#1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



Well, this is what I'm trying to understand. There is a lot of profanity laden anger being expressed over not "landing" The Chip, but before all the media hullabaloo about the Bulls interviewing him, the discussion about Porn Stache Mike as a potential Bulls coach was lukewarm, at best.


I'm not sure if its wise take what the Bulls are warm on as a great endorsement. These are still the Bulls yes?

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:03 pm
by HeavyC
For me, it's not really even about getting him to be the coach. It's just being reminded once again, that management is not wiling to pay for ANYTHING.

At this point, everyone better just start praying we luck out in the draft one of these years like we did with Jordan, because that's the only way this team is going to get better is through pure luck.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:04 pm
by girlygirl
Chad Ford has a column up on espn.com saying that the Knicks won over D'Antoni in large part because they showed they wanted him...the Bulls hemmed and hawed and didn't seem convinced he was the coach they really wanted.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:05 pm
by SWIFTSLICK
Once again the management of this team has low-balled their fans. The best coach available went to our rival. Dumb move. Now, we can look forward to a not ready for prime time player, or a "never has-been never will be" type. Which was the exact problem with Boylan being promoted.

Once again the fans of this team get shafted because management is too cheap. We might as well change the name of this team to the Minnesota Bulls. Because they run a large market team like a small market one. This is evident when they make dumb mistakes on critical decisions(as they did today).

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:08 pm
by SWIFTSLICK
bove310 wrote:IMO you guys lucked out by not getting D'Antoni. Defense wins championships.


When this team starts playing defense again be sure to let me know. :banghead:

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:09 pm
by fleet
girlygirl wrote:Chad Ford has a column up on espn.com saying that the Knicks won over D'Antoni in large part because they showed they wanted him...the Bulls hemmed and hawed and didn't seem convinced he was the coach they really wanted.


I knew it. *pats self on back* 8)

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:10 pm
by TheHumanTripod
HeavyC wrote:At this point, everyone better just start praying we luck out in the draft one of these years like we did with Jordan, because that's the only way this team is going to get better is through pure luck.


I always wondered what everybody's obsession with draft picks here was about. This current Bulls team is full of lottery picks already and we're aren't very close to contending. I always thought it was a bit naive to suddenly believe that getting another one would all of a sudden turn us into this huge contender right away. But after all this Reinsdorf stuff, I finally understand the obsession with draft picks & the lottery...

*Plans on watching more college basketball next year*

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:10 pm
by TB#1
fleetwood macbull wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'm not sure if its wise take what the Bulls are warm on as a great endorsement. These are still the Bulls yes?


I'm talking about fan reaction. If it comes down to basketball reality, we should probably be pretty happy right now.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:12 pm
by TB#1
If I had known that in advance, I'd have flown out, bought him lunch, given him a big hug and said there is more $ in NY. Go for it.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:13 pm
by nitetrain8603
fleetwood macbull wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I knew it. *pats self on back* 8)


I stated this in the beginning of the thread. Page 3, Stephen A Smith post.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:13 pm
by fleet
TB#1 wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I'm talking about fan reaction. If it comes down to basketball reality, we should probably be pretty happy right now.


ahh, basketball reality. This is something we all agree upon, the same basketball reality

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:13 pm
by League Circles
All this BS about not being willing to pay for anything is quite lame.

This team signed a free agent to a max deal to be able to pry him away from a rival 2 years ago. The same summer they resigned two of their players to lucrative contracts (Kirk and Noc).

Thsi team still paid a player more per year than any player in the history of the league, obviously for good reason.

Skiles was well paid from what I know (I might be mistaken). We sign Tyson Chandler to a lucrative contract.

We signed Joe Smith when we clearly didn't need to from a PR standpoint (we already had enough players at his spot).

This team is certainly not the biggest spenders, but if you think they are cheap, you all should talk to fans of about 25 teams in this league that have done far worse to their fans in terms of being cheap.

We spend enough to be competitive. That's all you can expect, IMO. We're liek the Cubs. You can make an argument that we shoudl spend more than anyone, but we spend more than most all, and that's all you can ask for.

Posted: Sat May 10, 2008 11:13 pm
by HeavyC
TheHumanTripod wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I always wondered what everybody's obsession with draft picks here was about. This current Bulls team is full of lottery picks already and we're aren't very close to contending. I always thought it was a bit naive to suddenly believe that getting another one would all of a sudden turn us into this huge contender right away. But after all this Reinsdorf stuff, I finally understand the obsession with draft picks & the lottery...

*Plans on watching more college basketball next year*


Yeah, don't even get me started on how badly we've either screwed up previous drafts or just been plain unlucky. This team has consistently been one or two picks back from getting the top tier players almost every year it seems. Unless the skies open up and just drop a good player in Paxson's lap, I don't see how they are getting out of this mess. The Bulls do not have the players to make any kind of serious run at a title.