coldfish wrote:I am really ticked about this, but I was only lukewarm on D'Antoni.
My issue is that there is a very good chance at this point that the Bulls end up with a really, really bad coaching staff next year. Assistants are being gobbled up with experienced coaches.
Maybe its just me, but I see the idea of hiring people with no coaching experience whatsoever, or very little, to be a complete joke. Even if its not in the NBA, there is a certain rhythm to coaching a game. A way of dealing with players that you don't learn as a player.
This Bulls team will see through a joke coach quickly. They did with Boylan and they will with the next guy. This team has no strong positive leaders. A guy like Hughes is going to run roughshod over a newbie coach.
In summary: I didn't see D'Antoni as a great fit. I just saw him as the last chance before the abyss. If the Bulls do hire a newbie (not Thibo, but a guy with truly little experience), blow the team up. Shoot for 10 wins and start trying to assemble something for the future. I thought that D'Antoni could get through to the current players. I really don't see much else that is going to work.
Why you don't see Tyrone Corbin winning 50 games?
I think we can find something good out there, but it will definitely be a big big risk.
I really see us missing out on Thibo and that's what has me. From everything we know Thibo and Dantoni were Pax first two choices. Paxson had to know he would be battling Kerr for Thibo, so he should of been aware of us missing out on him.
That in mind is why I see Paxson or JR making a mistake. We go from D'Antoni to guys like Corbin and Jackson and crossing our fingers and praying for Thibo. I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I'm smart enough to see that as being possible.
So is passing on Mike and waiting to hire a Jackson and Corbin worth it? If we land Thibo, then I will feel much better and say hey we dodged a bullet, but I just don't see that happening