Post#38 » by League Circles » Thu Oct 1, 2009 5:17 pm
Yeah I agree with those who lean towards being upset a bit by this. The reason for that is that VDN told Doug (at least I think it was in Doug's interview IIRC) within the last few days that Deng was healthy. It's just more BS from the organization. I have no problem with Deng, but I do have a problem with the organization's treatment of Deng, from the contract, to the non-trade when I was crying for it BEFORE he got injured last season and the season before, to the multiple mixed signals and BS about his current condition. If him missing practice is related to soreness or pain, that's a problem, and it makes the org. look really bad IMO for saying publicly that he's healthy, especially when they go out of their way to say how hard he's worked all summer (which, of course, we hear every year yet he doesn't improve IMO). If his missing practice is purely a systematic, pre-planned precautionary measure, it can be a slippery slope that will affect our team on the court.
I mean, if it's not related to pain or soreness, does this mean that they will only play him 30 mpg on the second night of back to backs in December, as opposed to the, say, 35 mpg he plays on the first night of back to backs? And if so, when will that end? Never? If it's not related to pain, and they say he's healthy, what's the time table for full activity, if it's even ever planned?
Also, how many apologies are people going to make for Luol Deng - or rather for the idea of Deng on our team? I love the guy as much as most of us but he's not a special player, and in order to win in this league you have to act very very decisively with non-special players. The second they show signed of being substantially prone to injury, you have to act quickly to see if there's a way to get rid off them wisely. Instead of doing that during the past two years, the Bulls stuck with him as if he was Scottie Pippen. Now it's too late, and Deng will likely have to play two entire healthy seasons to be a positive in a trade again. That's the thing about the NBA, really good players can very very quickly become negatives in trades after they sign their first extention. Teams must be conscious of that and be always thinking and talking of trades with these guys, because you don't want to EVER be in a position of having an untradeable contract taking up 20-25% of your cap room, it makes it very very hard to win. The Bulls obliviously let 2 major opportunities to avoid that slip by, and now have already lost one great player because of it. Who's the next good player we have to lose due to these mistakes? Hinrich? Tyrus-assuming he becomes good:)? Salmons? Miller? Lebron James - because we can't afford a second max FA to pair with him like a NJ or some others can? All so we can cling to a player who was only slightly better, when healthy, than his much lower paid alternatives like Noc, Salmons, James Johnson, or some MLE type players?
Deng's not a pussy, but I'm starting to think Bulls management and ownership are.