Image ImageImage Image

KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline

Moderators: HomoSapien, kulaz3000, Michael Jackson, Ice Man, dougthonus, Tommy Udo 6 , DASMACKDOWN, GimmeDat, Payt10, RedBulls23, coldfish, AshyLarrysDiaper, fleet

User avatar
The Big Dog
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,655
And1: 31
Joined: Jul 18, 2004

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#81 » by The Big Dog » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:46 pm

I do understand Kyrv's skepticism, management couldn't change its mind after Gordon accepted the offer on the table. Either we need more details or KC needs to lrn2contractlaw.
"I have not so strong body." - Jonas Valanciunas on why his game is similar to Chris Bosh's.
theanimal23
RealGM
Posts: 17,744
And1: 926
Joined: Mar 02, 2005

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#82 » by theanimal23 » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:46 pm

Coldfish perfectly sums up the feelings and reasons of fellow Bulls fans who miss Gordon. Great job.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 35,866
And1: 28,202
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#83 » by HomoSapien » Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:59 pm

coldfish wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:What about Brad Miller and Drew Gooden?


I don't know if that was in reference to me, but I specifically said you need strong guys who can move their feet. Miller can't and Gooden didn't.


It wasn't, it was in response to the Bulls just making defensive moves. I agree that they obviously favor defense, but like Doug I didn't agree with the characterization of Deng and Hinrich being no offense. I mean, Deng leads us in scoring and Hinrich averaged 16 ppg when he was resigned.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
DuckIII
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 68,955
And1: 33,663
Joined: Nov 25, 2003
Location: On my high horse.
     

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#84 » by DuckIII » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:26 pm

As a practical legal matter, if an offer is pending and accepted, you can't "pull it". The only reason the Bulls were able to avoid the Gordon offer was because a set deadline expired. They could have preemptively pulled it, I suppose, but evidently didn't - which seems incongruous with KC's report.


Although I suppose the real point is that the Bulls decided they didn't want Gordon to take the offer. Which we already knew and have discussed thousands of times.

Nothing new here.
Once a pickle, never a cucumber again.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 33,767
And1: 29,026
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#85 » by AirP. » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:29 pm

dougthonus wrote:
Tyrus(shot blocker, no real offense), Thabo(defensive player no real offense), Noah(defensive player no real offense), Ben Wallace(no offense at all but we gave him 15 mil a year), Hinrich(defensive player, no real offense), Deng(defensive player, no real offense). Now toss in the comment of JR telling D'Antoini that he'd have a problem if the team didn't play good defense and it's as clear as day what's going on.


I don't think that's an accurate depiction of either Hinrich or Deng. They may not be great offensive players, but they clearly aren't the "no offense" type like the other players you mentioned.



You're right, not as bad as no offense like the others were, but in reality... Deng and Hinrich are finishers... as in capable of finishing plays with a midrange shot(at a solid rate) and Deng is solid at hitting lanes and Hinrich is ok at 3pts. To me that's average at best for offense. NEITHER player can create their own shot at a decent rate(and make it) not so much to go one on one in the offense, but to create a decent shot if the offense doesn't create a solid shot for the team.
AirP.
RealGM
Posts: 33,767
And1: 29,026
Joined: Nov 21, 2007

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#86 » by AirP. » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:33 pm

HomoSapien wrote:What about Brad Miller and Drew Gooden?


Gooden came here because we were looking just to dump Wallace. Miller was a 2010 contract along with Salmons. Plus... Salmons was a short term bandaid to get us from the start of this year to next year with the loss of a good scorer.

It's amazing that with all the defense we've drafted we're horrible on defense with one or 2 players injured.
User avatar
Luke NOT Luc
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,262
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Location: Downtown Chicago

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#87 » by Luke NOT Luc » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:38 pm

AirP. wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:What about Brad Miller and Drew Gooden?


Gooden came here because we were looking just to dump Wallace. Miller was a 2010 contract along with Salmons. Plus... Salmons was a short term bandaid to get us from the start of this year to next year with the loss of a good scorer.

It's amazing that with all the defense we've drafted we're horrible on defense with one or 2 players injured.

Actually, I recall us wanting to trade for Gooden a couple times before we actually did, another Pax "target"
User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,050
And1: 4,451
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#88 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:39 pm

Luke NOT Luc wrote:
AirP. wrote:
HomoSapien wrote:What about Brad Miller and Drew Gooden?


Gooden came here because we were looking just to dump Wallace. Miller was a 2010 contract along with Salmons. Plus... Salmons was a short term bandaid to get us from the start of this year to next year with the loss of a good scorer.

It's amazing that with all the defense we've drafted we're horrible on defense with one or 2 players injured.

Actually, I recall us wanting to trade for Gooden a couple times before we actually did, another Pax "target"




Link to any rumored deals?
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston
User avatar
Magilla_Gorilla
RealGM
Posts: 32,050
And1: 4,451
Joined: Oct 24, 2006
Location: Sunday Morning coming down...
         

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#89 » by Magilla_Gorilla » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:40 pm

DuckIII wrote:As a practical legal matter, if an offer is pending and accepted, you can't "pull it". The only reason the Bulls were able to avoid the Gordon offer was because a set deadline expired. They could have preemptively pulled it, I suppose, but evidently didn't - which seems incongruous with KC's report.


Although I suppose the real point is that the Bulls decided they didn't want Gordon to take the offer. Which we already knew and have discussed thousands of times.

Nothing new here.




That was my thought.
Sham - Y U NO sell me a t-shirt? Best OB/GYN Houston
User avatar
Leslie Forman
RealGM
Posts: 10,119
And1: 6,300
Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Location: 1700 Center Dr, Ames, IA 50011

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#90 » by Leslie Forman » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:41 pm

If Gordon had signed it, Jerry could not have just voided it, so we should all be glad Gordon didn't sign it, because then he probably would've been traded for a giant pile of crap and we'd be even more pissed off.

When this team had the Rose/Gordon/Salmons backcourt, even with the craptastic frontcourt, they were playing like a 50-win team. It was the best offense since '98. I mean, you just unload Kirk and Deng, and you've got a team that actually has even more cap room and should be, at worst, a .500 team. Instead they get rid of the most important part of what made that offense successful and stuck with the two players we already knew were mediocre at best on offense and had horrible contracts.

This really is probably the dumbest FO in the league now that Isiah's gone. Only Toronto I think is arguable. It's like they're the defensive minded version of Toronto's FO. Except the defense isn't even good, so I suppose that makes them even worse.
User avatar
sdeezy
RealGM
Posts: 14,244
And1: 122
Joined: Jul 15, 2007

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#91 » by sdeezy » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:44 pm

What does this say about management? no really. They can' be this blatantly stupid can they?
montestewart wrote:Blatche and McGee standing next to Boozer and Thomas reminded me of first-time offenders meeting real cons in a "scared straight" program.
.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 35,866
And1: 28,202
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#92 » by HomoSapien » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:50 pm

No, they are this blatantly stupid. Since Paxson has taken over, every single trade has had something to do with the team's finances. It's never been simply about getting better. His smartest move came at Phoenix's incompetence.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
Luke NOT Luc
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,262
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 15, 2009
Location: Downtown Chicago

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#93 » by Luke NOT Luc » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:51 pm

Magilla_Gorilla wrote:Link to any rumored deals?


Forgive me for not taking the whole day to try to find an old article that says that we want to trade for Drew Gooden, but I'm almost positive it was in the ESPN rumors? Nevertheless, us making him a team captain doesn't suggest he was a player we wanted just to dump Wallace
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 35,866
And1: 28,202
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#94 » by HomoSapien » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:52 pm

For what it's worth, I remember hearing rumors about the Bulls liking Gooden as well. Not that this means anything, but it was a Paxson that brought him to the Cavs as well...
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
Scott May
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 05, 2001

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#95 » by Scott May » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:53 pm

HomoSapien wrote:No, they are this blatantly stupid. Since Paxson has taken over, every single trade has had something to do with the team's finances. It's never been simply about getting better. His smartest move came at Phoenix's incompetence.


It wasn't incompetence on Phoenix's part -- they were making a huge, bold, credible and feasible push to sign Kobe Bryant and needed to clear that incoming draft pick's salary slot at any cost. They chose to sell the pick to the Bulls specifically because they thought the Bulls would be horrible again and the draft pick from the following season would be comparable to the one they were giving up.
On indefinite hiatus as of May 27, 2014.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 35,866
And1: 28,202
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#96 » by HomoSapien » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:54 pm

Fair enough, Scott ... but I still think that's one of the few examples of Paxson doing something just to make the Bulls better.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
Scott May
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 05, 2001

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#97 » by Scott May » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:55 pm

I'm not understanding the people invoking a legal defense for the Bulls' actions here. I am pretty sure the offer they made to Gordon was a verbal one, or maybe written down on a scrap of paper or in a memo. That's not the same as handing him an offer sheet or a blank check. If Gordon had accepted the offer, there was still the formal paperwork to sign, and thus a gap wherein the Bulls could have said, no, sorry about that, we've changed our mind.
On indefinite hiatus as of May 27, 2014.
User avatar
Scott May
Head Coach
Posts: 7,104
And1: 24
Joined: Jul 05, 2001

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#98 » by Scott May » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:55 pm

HomoSapien wrote:Fair enough, Scott ... but I still think that's one of the few examples of Paxson doing something just to make the Bulls better.


True. It's also an offer that a trained monkey could have and would have accepted.
On indefinite hiatus as of May 27, 2014.
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 35,866
And1: 28,202
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#99 » by HomoSapien » Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:57 pm

I don't want to speak for Duck, but I think he was saying that if Gordon had signed the contract instantly they couldn't void it once it'd have been signed.

That being said, I don't think that the Bulls are required to honor an offer.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
Leslie Forman
RealGM
Posts: 10,119
And1: 6,300
Joined: Apr 21, 2006
Location: 1700 Center Dr, Ames, IA 50011

Re: KC: Bulls Would Have Pulled BG Offer Regardless of Deadline 

Post#100 » by Leslie Forman » Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:04 pm

HomoSapien wrote:His smartest move came at Phoenix's incompetence.


Actually, the point of that trade was to get Al Harrington. So even that wouldn't have really been that great a move unless Indiana hadn't screwed up.

Scott May wrote:It wasn't incompetence on Phoenix's part


No, it really was. The chances of getting Kobe were between fat and none. They ended up blowing half of it on Que…Qui…QRich instead, which was what they were always gonna end up doing.

Return to Chicago Bulls