JujitsuFlip wrote:After this playoff run, Niang is negative value for sure.KuruptedCav wrote:Mitchell for Ingram needs more added from the Pelicans than they should be willing to move.
And if the destination is somewhere else, then it depends on the asset split.
I’m glad the Cavs now have LeVert, Strus, Nieng, Wade as players who can fill out trades.
I still think the most likely scenario is Mitchell extending and the team pivoting to a Mitchell/Mobley core with Allen and Garland eventually being moved to add better complementary players (not necessarily better players).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Wade's injury history, always being at the end of the season, probably makes him less desirable.
I would probably hold onto Strus, guy would be a good 2, coming off the bench if they're able to get 3 starters for Allen and Mitchell.
I'm cool with moving on from LeVert this summer even if the Cavs make no other moves. I'm over the hot and cold inconsistencies. Just like good and bad Cedi all over again.
I wouldn’t dump anyone. I’m just commenting that post Mitchell trade the Cavs had no roster flexibility and no assets outside of their Core4.
I’m not saying John Collins (or Gordon Hayward or any other player) was the answer, but, the Cavs weren’t in a position to kick those tires last year and are in that position this year.
I like Strus, I like Levert, I like Okoro, I would like it more if someone was 6’8”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk