ImageImageImage

Gasol traded to the Lakers

Moderator: ijspeelman

User avatar
Benedict_Boozer
RealGM
Posts: 17,070
And1: 5,726
Joined: Aug 08, 2004

 

Post#21 » by Benedict_Boozer » Mon Feb 4, 2008 12:42 am

B Mac wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




Exactly. We all know Kobe would try to 1 up LeBron just like every other time and fail. Kobe trying to outperform LeBron leads to Cavaliers victory every time.


LOL ain't that the truth.

The last game in LA was a truly classic example. Phil Jackson even took him out of the game :lol:
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#22 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:36 am

Actually Bulls fans are pissed because Chicago could have beaten LA's deal.

They have 6 expiring deals. Obviously the Bulls did not wish to trade Deng and Gordon (2 of the expirings).

Bulls could have signed & traded PJ Brown to make a deal work.

The Bulls refused to do so because the owner refuses to pay Lux tax.

This is despite the fact that the Bulls have been the most profitable team in the last 2 decades. last year their profit according to Forbes was an astronomical $55 million with the second place team (Detroit) more than $20 million behind them & no other team over $10 million.

So for the Bulls to get so cheap when they are rolling in dough - well, this is what ticks off Bulls fans.

Gasol wouldnt make too much difference to Bulls. We are losing fine without him. We would have continued to lose with him.

It's the cheapness of the management in refusing to pay Lux Tax that outrages most of the Bulls fans.

I'm not upset - i know how management is. So i expect this course of action.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
L&H_05
RealGM
Posts: 11,569
And1: 94
Joined: Oct 02, 2005
Location: I love this game !
     

 

Post#23 » by L&H_05 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 4:05 am

Why do the Bulls refuse to let go of Gordon ??

He's a fine scorer and all, but he doesn't bring a ton to the table on either end besides just shooting...
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#24 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Mon Feb 4, 2008 4:58 am

L&H_05 wrote:Why do the Bulls refuse to let go of Gordon ??

He's a fine scorer and all, but he doesn't bring a ton to the table on either end besides just shooting...


We dont know.

Look - Paxson has NEVER traded a draft selection of his. All 9 are still on the team : Hinrich, Gordon, Deng, Duhon, Thomas, Sefolosha, Noah, Gray Curry

He has not traded any of his free agent signings: Nocioni, wallace, Griffin, Smith

Paxson just seems too attached to his players - which is Ok if your team is winning

Last Bulls trade was with Cleveland in 2006: Eddie Basden for Martynas A.

Paxson just doesnt like to pull the trigger on trades. I cant explain it
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
Bamboozled
Sophomore
Posts: 189
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 11, 2005

 

Post#25 » by Bamboozled » Mon Feb 4, 2008 1:39 pm

I think this trade really goes to show how low of an opinion the rest of the league has of our trade assets. Regardless of how you view Pau Gasol, the guy is a very good power forward, and Memphis willingly took 30 cents on the dollar for him.
Go Cavs!
TheOUTLAW
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 41,920
And1: 2,757
Joined: Aug 23, 2002
     

 

Post#26 » by TheOUTLAW » Mon Feb 4, 2008 3:04 pm

The real problem was that Memphis wanted to maximize the amount of expirings that they had and the only ones we had (Newble & Brown) were not as much as LAL had to offer.
UncleDrew wrote: I get Buckets!

Return to Cleveland Cavaliers