RealGM

Posted: **Fri May 1, 2009 12:30 am**

just because sheed doesnt post up, dont mean he cant, my thing is i love anderson, but i think him and hollins are similar, why add a player who does the same things as another. wallace adds a demention to this team the mavs dont have. now i would sit him down if im donnie and tell him we need him in the post, but i still hink he has a couple years left in him

Posted: **Fri May 1, 2009 12:34 am**

thaAteam wrote:just because sheed doesnt post up, dont mean he cant, my thing is i love anderson, but i think him and hollins are similar, why add a player who does the same things as another. wallace adds a demention to this team the mavs dont have. now i would sit him down if im donnie and tell him we need him in the post, but i still hink he has a couple years left in him

Once again, fine with Hollins. If that is your opinion, then good. But Wallace offers nothing to this team we don't already have. I totally disagree with that.

I can see a Dirk/Damp combo with Sheed/Bass subbing in at the same time. I can give you that.

But what I never, never want to see is Kidd/Terry/Howard/Dirk/Sheed. They would have a terrible +/- because they brick without an offensive rebounder.

Dirk 1.1 O + 7.3D = 8.4 RPG.........37.7 MPG
Sheed 0.8 O + 6.6 D = 7.4 RPG......32.2 MPG

Dampier 2.7 O + 4.4 D = 7.1 RPG..........23 MPG
Bass 1.6 O + 2.9 D = 4.5 RPG...............19 MPG

Sheed is the WORST offensive rebouner of the bunch despite having more minutes that Damp and Bass

Edit:
Anderson 2.3 O + 3.9 D = 6.2 RPG..........20.6 MPG

Posted: **Fri May 1, 2009 12:46 am**

JES12 wrote:If I spend MLE money on an over 30 big man, it will be one that plays in the paint on both sides of the floor like Chris Anderson.

Just reiterating the "if."

Never said Anderson was my #1. Just saying I definately take him before Wallace.

Posted: **Sun May 3, 2009 10:03 pm**

After seeing game one, does anyone else see that Birdman >>>>> Wallace?

24 min, +24 on +/-, 11 pts, 6 blks, 6 reb, 2 ast, 1 stl, only 1 to & 1 pf.

Posted: **Mon May 4, 2009 2:22 am**

I would take him over Wallace but I would not give the Birdman the entire MLE. We have bigger needs, mainly SG and PG. I get ill seeing Barea at 5'8" in the starting lineup at the SG.

Posted: **Tue May 5, 2009 3:19 pm**

SLAM contributor J. Gamble [making his debut with us next issue] hears from a close personal friend of Rasheed Wallace’s that unless Sheed gets $8 million to play next year, he’s going to retire. If that’s true, we’ve probably seen the last of Sheed in the NBA. Link

Posted: **Tue May 5, 2009 5:49 pm**

Sheed is not going to retire. He will retire for ~60 games and then jump on the bandwagon of whatever team is Stern's pick of the year.

Posted: **Wed May 6, 2009 5:28 pm**

With Sheed and Dirk together, I smell the Finals again.

RealGM

Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks

Re: Rasheed Wallace is interested in playing with the Mavericks