I agree. The 5m I mentioned is by dropping tapia after the season, right? I forget all the details. I’m totally fine dropping him now and calling up a bison. Luke or Taylor or Groshans or stick with Lopez.
Think the plan was to fix him and trade him at deadline potentially and save more money to reallocate?
I too favor trading janson only due to contract length. I’ve been a high guy on Jansen and biggio.
Could Jansen get a top 100 prospect type? As I like Schad idea
Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Moderator: JaysRule15
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
-
- Junior
- Posts: 268
- And1: 46
- Joined: Nov 02, 2014
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
-
- Junior
- Posts: 268
- And1: 46
- Joined: Nov 02, 2014
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Jays were desperate for a high floor at time and paid him to be a 1.5 war player. Nothing crazy. And used like 5 m savings by trading pillar towards it. I think those numbers are right
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
-
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,870
- And1: 5,689
- Joined: Jun 16, 2015
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Guys are still referencing trash metrics lol. Even after a win the tapia narrative lives on.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 34,400
- And1: 19,444
- Joined: Dec 07, 2009
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
It would be pretty interesting to find any metric or stat that Tapia is actually good at.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,431
- And1: 17,108
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
johanliebert wrote:Guys are still referencing trash metrics lol. Even after a win the tapia narrative lives on.
You continually suggest that these are trash metrics, and that there are better metrics that show that Tapia is actually good. Please. Enlighten us. You have the floor.
**** your asterisk.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 67,600
- And1: 31,823
- Joined: Jul 25, 2005
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Schad wrote:johanliebert wrote:Guys are still referencing trash metrics lol. Even after a win the tapia narrative lives on.
You continually suggest that these are trash metrics, and that there are better metrics that show that Tapia is actually good. Please. Enlighten us. You have the floor.
So far I have seen “he’s on a heater” and now “the team won a game”.
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,431
- And1: 17,108
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
wamco wrote:Jays were desperate for a high floor at time and paid him to be a 1.5 war player. Nothing crazy. And used like 5 m savings by trading pillar towards it. I think those numbers are right
Also, Tapia wasn't good previously, but he was not this bad, either. His only major league level skills were his speed and ability to get on base, but those are useful.
This year, because his K rate is up and his walk rate has cratered, he is now very bad about getting on base, and consequently his speed is largely negated, as speed plays little role in walking from the batter's box back to the dugout. But at least he probably won't get on the team for more than a few weeks.
**** your asterisk.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
- bluerap23
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,446
- And1: 6,611
- Joined: Aug 15, 2012
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Schad wrote:wamco wrote:Jays were desperate for a high floor at time and paid him to be a 1.5 war player. Nothing crazy. And used like 5 m savings by trading pillar towards it. I think those numbers are right
Also, Tapia wasn't good previously, but he was not this bad, either. His only major league level skills were his speed and ability to get on base, but those are useful.
This year, because his K rate is up and his walk rate has cratered, he is now very bad about getting on base, and consequently his speed is largely negated, as speed plays little role in walking from the batter's box back to the dugout. But at least he probably won't get on the team for more than a few weeks.
This is the part that is interesting. In the month of June he has an 820 OPS without a single walk. You can see that they have got him to change his approach with an emphasis on finding more power. It shows they believe something is in there and it wasn't purely a salary dump, thus all the opportunity/playing time. I don't see it. I mean, maybe a few years ago it would have been ok to try fixing him when we were in rebuild (by my count they were 1/3 on project outfielders, which is pretty good considering the 1 was Teo).
But this season is too important to give him playing time over far better hitters that have already found IT. Also - why not let him try the new approach in AAA? If he destroys those pitchers then give him a shot.
I actually wouldn't mind him as a 4th outfielder if he played as rarely as a 4th outfielder should. It would also help if he was an average defender.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
- Madvillainy2004
- Head Coach
- Posts: 7,358
- And1: 7,248
- Joined: Jul 03, 2019
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
bluerap23 wrote:Schad wrote:wamco wrote:Jays were desperate for a high floor at time and paid him to be a 1.5 war player. Nothing crazy. And used like 5 m savings by trading pillar towards it. I think those numbers are right
Also, Tapia wasn't good previously, but he was not this bad, either. His only major league level skills were his speed and ability to get on base, but those are useful.
This year, because his K rate is up and his walk rate has cratered, he is now very bad about getting on base, and consequently his speed is largely negated, as speed plays little role in walking from the batter's box back to the dugout. But at least he probably won't get on the team for more than a few weeks.
This is the part that is interesting. In the month of June he has an 820 OPS without a single walk. You can see that they have got him to change his approach with an emphasis on finding more power. It shows they believe something is in there and it wasn't purely a salary dump, thus all the opportunity/playing time. I don't see it. I mean, maybe a few years ago it would have been ok to try fixing him when we were in rebuild (by my count they were 1/3 on project outfielders, which is pretty good considering the 1 was Teo).
But this season is too important to give him playing time over far better hitters that have already found IT. Also - why not let him try the new approach in AAA? If he destroys those pitchers then give him a shot.
I actually wouldn't mind him as a 4th outfielder if he played as rarely as a 4th outfielder should. It would also help if he was an average defender.
Yeah if we were gonna play a 4th outfielder this much I would've preffered we used assests for a good one lol
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
- LBJKB24MJ23
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,682
- And1: 21,198
- Joined: Jan 22, 2014
- Location: Bermuda
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Fairview4Life wrote:Schad wrote:johanliebert wrote:Guys are still referencing trash metrics lol. Even after a win the tapia narrative lives on.
You continually suggest that these are trash metrics, and that there are better metrics that show that Tapia is actually good. Please. Enlighten us. You have the floor.
So far I have seen “he’s on a heater” and now “the team won a game”.
OP as Kevin
https://youtu.be/rsfKSzlh_Bg?t=297
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,638
- And1: 1,817
- Joined: Oct 26, 2006
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
Where the f*ck is the next/Brewers game thread!!!?!!?!?!?!?
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
- Schad
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 57,431
- And1: 17,108
- Joined: Feb 08, 2006
- Location: The Goat Rodeo
Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22
GoRapstheoriginal wrote:Where the f*ck is the next/Brewers game thread!!!?!!?!?!?!?
If we win a series, the next game thread is created by the creator of the previous series thread.
If we don't win a series, the next game thread is created by anyone else.
So: why aren't you creating the game thread?
**** your asterisk.