ImageImageImageImageImage

Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22

Moderator: JaysRule15

Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 2,320
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#301 » by Mehar » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:40 am

Easily the worst performance by an Umpire in years. Made Angel Hernandez look like a Great Umpire. A terrible performance by Romano helped to prolong this misery, watching this garbage Umpire call his balls and strikes.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,400
And1: 19,444
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#302 » by Randle McMurphy » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:41 am

JaysRule15 wrote:Man, what a soulcrushing L.

More because of having to watch that umpiring for me. Our pitching allowed 21 baserunners in that one, we hardly deserved it.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,431
And1: 17,108
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#303 » by Schad » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:41 am

Read on Twitter


That's six called strikes that were demonstrably outside the zone on Espinal alone.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
Madvillainy2004
Head Coach
Posts: 7,358
And1: 7,248
Joined: Jul 03, 2019
       

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#304 » by Madvillainy2004 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:42 am

Doug Eddings just waterboarded my love of baseball for 4 hours
linery88
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,549
And1: 571
Joined: Aug 06, 2021
         

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#305 » by linery88 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:43 am

Good to see Bo losing it like that.It wont hurt or help,just good to see it.
User avatar
Madvillainy2004
Head Coach
Posts: 7,358
And1: 7,248
Joined: Jul 03, 2019
       

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#306 » by Madvillainy2004 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:45 am

Schad wrote:
Read on Twitter


That's six called strikes that were demonstrably outside the zone on Espinal alone.


Basketball Twitter would say Doug Eddings was in his bag tonight.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,400
And1: 19,444
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#307 » by Randle McMurphy » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:45 am

Schad wrote:
Read on Twitter


That's six called strikes that were demonstrably outside the zone on Espinal alone.

Image
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 2,320
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#308 » by Mehar » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:47 am

The terrible umpiring aside, Shapiro/Atkins need to definitely shore up the Bullpen. We have depth at Catching, and Jansen along with a couple of mid-tier prospects should potentially bring back two very good high leverage Relievers. Bullpen had been overworked this year, with guys like Kikuchi barely throwing 3-4 innings at times.
linery88
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,549
And1: 571
Joined: Aug 06, 2021
         

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#309 » by linery88 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 4:57 am

These umpires dont give a **** anymore.They figure they are going to be replaced soon anyways,but not next year.Manfred said robo-umps wont happen next season.The question I have is,what happens if robo-umps dont work either.
User avatar
TOStateofMind
RealGM
Posts: 28,656
And1: 21,424
Joined: Jul 16, 2008
   

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#310 » by TOStateofMind » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:00 am

Schad wrote:
Read on Twitter


That's six called strikes that were demonstrably outside the zone on Espinal alone.

Image
just an all timer..and we had to suffer through 12 innings of this sh** lol
Image
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 2,320
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#311 » by Mehar » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:03 am

linery88 wrote:These umpires dont give a **** anymore.They figure they are going to be replaced soon anyways,but not next year.Manfred said robo-umps wont happen next season.The question I have is,what happens if robo-umps dont work either.

The Robot Umpire can not do much worse than Doug Eddings. Not sure if he was drunk tonight, but that was one of the worst performances I have ever seen behind the plate for both teams.
User avatar
Raps in 4
RealGM
Posts: 62,139
And1: 54,854
Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#312 » by Raps in 4 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:13 am

linery88 wrote:These umpires dont give a **** anymore.They figure they are going to be replaced soon anyways,but not next year.Manfred said robo-umps wont happen next season.The question I have is,what happens if robo-umps dont work either.


How would robo umps not work?

Multiple tennis tournaments, including grand slams, switched to robo umps one or two years ago. There hasn't been a single missed call. They're literally the definition of infallible.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,431
And1: 17,108
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#313 » by Schad » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:22 am

Raps in 4 wrote:
linery88 wrote:These umpires dont give a **** anymore.They figure they are going to be replaced soon anyways,but not next year.Manfred said robo-umps wont happen next season.The question I have is,what happens if robo-umps dont work either.


How would robo umps not work?

Multiple tennis tournaments, including grand slams, switched to robo umps one or two years ago. There hasn't been a single missed call. They're literally the definition of infallible.


And the baseball tech is already in place and very reliable. The Statcast ball tracker is, by all accounts, extremely accurate.

It is a bit amusing that MLB wants to make the umpires' jobs far easier (while also paying them the same) and they're all like "nah, I demand to be able to continually embarrass myself on national television".
Image
**** your asterisk.
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 2,320
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#314 » by Mehar » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:36 am

Games with Robot Umpires are now being tried out in AAA, if I am not mistaken. The Statcast Ball is very accurate, and the technology is in place. Baseball fans of all teams, have had enough of clowns like Doug Eddings and Angel Hernandez calling Balls and Strikes.
linery88
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,549
And1: 571
Joined: Aug 06, 2021
         

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#315 » by linery88 » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:37 am

Raps in 4 wrote:
linery88 wrote:These umpires dont give a **** anymore.They figure they are going to be replaced soon anyways,but not next year.Manfred said robo-umps wont happen next season.The question I have is,what happens if robo-umps dont work either.


How would robo umps not work?

Multiple tennis tournaments, including grand slams, switched to robo umps one or two years ago. There hasn't been a single missed call. They're literally the definition of infallible.


I,m just lowering my expectations ,just in case.
Plus,there has been reporting about issues,and bugs that have to be worked out,and not sure about how long that will take.
Auto calls are way easier for tennis lines than they would be for a baseball strike zone-IMO.
I hope it works,but wont be shocked if it doesn,t.
johanliebert
General Manager
Posts: 9,870
And1: 5,689
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#316 » by johanliebert » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:38 am

Raps in 4 wrote:
linery88 wrote:These umpires dont give a **** anymore.They figure they are going to be replaced soon anyways,but not next year.Manfred said robo-umps wont happen next season.The question I have is,what happens if robo-umps dont work either.


How would robo umps not work?

Multiple tennis tournaments, including grand slams, switched to robo umps one or two years ago. There hasn't been a single missed call. They're literally the definition of infallible.

Hawk eye indeed has got a few calls wrong it’s not perfect.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,431
And1: 17,108
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#317 » by Schad » Wed Jun 22, 2022 5:50 am

johanliebert wrote:Hawk eye indeed has got a few calls wrong it’s not perfect.


But it's far, far more accurate than what it replaced.

MLB's system has an average deviation of .25", and a maximum deviation of less than .5":

https://technology.mlblogs.com/introducing-statcast-2020-hawk-eye-and-google-cloud-a5f5c20321b8

Doug Eddings, meanwhile, called almost 20 pitches as strikes that were more than an inch off the plate, including several that were 4+ inches away. There really isn't a comparison here.
Image
**** your asterisk.
User avatar
Schad
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 57,431
And1: 17,108
Joined: Feb 08, 2006
Location: The Goat Rodeo
     

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#318 » by Schad » Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:16 am

And it's confirmed: Eddings set a new season high for number of missed calls. Granted, it was an extra inning game, but they were also a particularly egregious 29 missed calls...he strangely got a lot of the borderline ones correct, while managing to **** up pitches that were no-doubters.

Read on Twitter
Image
**** your asterisk.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,400
And1: 19,444
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#319 » by Randle McMurphy » Wed Jun 22, 2022 6:25 am

Schad wrote:And it's confirmed: Eddings set a new season high for number of missed calls. Granted, it was an extra inning game, but they were also a particularly egregious 29 missed calls...he strangely got a lot of the borderline ones correct, while managing to **** up pitches that were no-doubters.

I was thinking at the end there that it was going to be around 30. Incredible.

My hope is that they somehow give the guy a Yankees playoff game and he has that kind of performance. It would effectively force the league into making the robot umpire change sooner that they otherwise would.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Fairview4Life
RealGM
Posts: 67,600
And1: 31,822
Joined: Jul 25, 2005
     

Re: Blue Jays (38-28) at White Sox (31-33) - June 20-22 

Post#320 » by Fairview4Life » Wed Jun 22, 2022 10:55 am

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Schad wrote:Just end it. I don't think my psyche can handle any more of this ballgame and this umpiring.

Espinal might be the most mild-mannered person in baseball. After the sequence of calls that have gone against him, the Dalai Lama would have gotten tossed.

Bautista would have been gone 3.5 hours ago with these calls.


Still one of the best quotes of all time.
"Sometimes I have trouble more than other players dealing with my production being affected by somebody else's mediocrity. It's just the way that I am as a person, it's a tougher pill to swallow for me sometimes."
9. Similarly, IF THOU HAST SPENT the entire offseason predicting that thy team will stink, thou shalt not gloat, nor even be happy, shouldst thou turn out to be correct. Realistic analysis is fine, but be a fan first, a smug smarty-pants second.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays