ImageImageImageImageImage

Blue Jays 23/24 Offseason Thread

Moderator: JaysRule15

polo007
General Manager
Posts: 8,560
And1: 2,653
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#61 » by polo007 » Mon Nov 6, 2023 11:08 pm

Read on Twitter
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,721
And1: 2,304
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#62 » by Mehar » Tue Nov 7, 2023 12:07 am

polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter

I would have spent that money on keeping Hicks, and let Green walk. Not sure paying over 10 million to Green was the right course of action. Green did not overly impress me in the games he pitched. He was not the Chad Green I remembered from years ago. His velocity and command was not the same, and even in his scoreless appearances, he got hit hard.
JN
RealGM
Posts: 18,908
And1: 9,953
Joined: Feb 02, 2007
   

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#63 » by JN » Tue Nov 7, 2023 1:47 am

polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter


I thought it was Green that held the option based on various posts I had seen in September.

This is strange, and seemingly not that a good move on the surface by the Jays.

Would rather hold the money for the offence, and if those options go away, there will always be some reliever left on the market in Jan/Feb that you can give this money to.
JN
RealGM
Posts: 18,908
And1: 9,953
Joined: Feb 02, 2007
   

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#64 » by JN » Tue Nov 7, 2023 1:51 am

polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter


These moves show a real lack of system depth to me, given that there were no better options for our 40 man.

Brendan Little is a 25 year old reliever who has not been particularly good at AAA the last 2 years.
And we know Mitch White.
Would have hoped we had developed some better options that could supersede the "talent" above.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,010
And1: 3,568
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#65 » by s e n s i » Tue Nov 7, 2023 2:03 am

Mehar wrote:
polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter

I would have spent that money on keeping Hicks, and let Green walk. Not sure paying over 10 million to Green was the right course of action. Green did not overly impress me in the games he pitched. He was not the Chad Green I remembered from years ago. His velocity and command was not the same, and even in his scoreless appearances, he got hit hard.


hicks wasn't returning anyway and by all accounts wants to be a starter.

it was a super small sample but chad green pitched better than he has his entire career, really. his FB velocity was basically the same as it was the previous 3 seasons and only 0.4 mph off his career average. he was far better than we could have hoped for coming off TJS.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,362
And1: 19,430
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#66 » by Randle McMurphy » Tue Nov 7, 2023 2:25 am

JN wrote:
polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter


These moves show a real lack of system depth to me, given that there were no better options for our 40 man.

Brendan Little is a 25 year old reliever who has not been particularly good at AAA the last 2 years.
And we know Mitch White.
Would have hoped we had developed some better options that could supersede the "talent" above.

Mitch White had a ridiculously dominant end to his season in AAA and was hitting 97 MPH. They couldn't let him go after that.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,721
And1: 2,304
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#67 » by Mehar » Tue Nov 7, 2023 4:56 am

s e n s i wrote:
Mehar wrote:
polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter

I would have spent that money on keeping Hicks, and let Green walk. Not sure paying over 10 million to Green was the right course of action. Green did not overly impress me in the games he pitched. He was not the Chad Green I remembered from years ago. His velocity and command was not the same, and even in his scoreless appearances, he got hit hard.


hicks wasn't returning anyway and by all accounts wants to be a starter.

it was a super small sample but chad green pitched better than he has his entire career, really. his FB velocity was basically the same as it was the previous 3 seasons and only 0.4 mph off his career average. he was far better than we could have hoped for coming off TJS.

I would not call a 5.25 ERA in 12 appearances over a month, pitching better than his career. I remember Green as a Yankee, and he showed none of that dominance in his one month as a Jay. I realize he was coming off surgery, but I would have personally let Green walk and used that over 10 million a year to target a few other relievers in free agency.
User avatar
JaysRule15
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 23,768
And1: 120,010
Joined: Dec 26, 2011
Location: Malvern Crew
       

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#68 » by JaysRule15 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 5:18 am

Aside from a couple rough outings when he first came up, Green was solid.

Hicks never really seemed interested in being here and wants a starter opportunity. Even if that doesn't happen, some team will likely give him big money to be closer.

It really sucks that Pearson looks like a wash. I was really hoping he'd have become a high leverage arm in the pen by now.
Image
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 27,482
And1: 12,525
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A low-variance future conducive to raising children
     

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#69 » by SharoneWright » Tue Nov 7, 2023 5:18 am

polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter


you're not in Milwaukee anymore.

sheesh. I could literally manage a team. but, congrats on your success Craig Counsell.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,010
And1: 3,568
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#70 » by s e n s i » Tue Nov 7, 2023 8:59 am

Mehar wrote:
s e n s i wrote:
Mehar wrote:I would have spent that money on keeping Hicks, and let Green walk. Not sure paying over 10 million to Green was the right course of action. Green did not overly impress me in the games he pitched. He was not the Chad Green I remembered from years ago. His velocity and command was not the same, and even in his scoreless appearances, he got hit hard.


hicks wasn't returning anyway and by all accounts wants to be a starter.

it was a super small sample but chad green pitched better than he has his entire career, really. his FB velocity was basically the same as it was the previous 3 seasons and only 0.4 mph off his career average. he was far better than we could have hoped for coming off TJS.

I would not call a 5.25 ERA in 12 appearances over a month, pitching better than his career. I remember Green as a Yankee, and he showed none of that dominance in his one month as a Jay. I realize he was coming off surgery, but I would have personally let Green walk and used that over 10 million a year to target a few other relievers in free agency.


yeah, i figured as much that you looked at his ERA and his ERA only. where to allocate any sum of money is always up for debate but green's peripherals were in line if not better than his career numbers.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
User avatar
Madvillainy2004
Head Coach
Posts: 7,354
And1: 7,247
Joined: Jul 03, 2019
       

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#71 » by Madvillainy2004 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 10:46 am

s e n s i wrote:
Mehar wrote:
s e n s i wrote:
hicks wasn't returning anyway and by all accounts wants to be a starter.

it was a super small sample but chad green pitched better than he has his entire career, really. his FB velocity was basically the same as it was the previous 3 seasons and only 0.4 mph off his career average. he was far better than we could have hoped for coming off TJS.

I would not call a 5.25 ERA in 12 appearances over a month, pitching better than his career. I remember Green as a Yankee, and he showed none of that dominance in his one month as a Jay. I realize he was coming off surgery, but I would have personally let Green walk and used that over 10 million a year to target a few other relievers in free agency.


yeah, i figured as much that you looked at his ERA and his ERA only. where to allocate any sum of money is always up for debate but green's peripherals were in line if not better than his career numbers.


Yeah with Hicks 100% gone I'll take my chances on Green being good this season. Strong periphals and he'll probably be better with a full camp to ramp up + more removed from his TJS.

Relievers in general are Voodoo anyways no guarantee Hicks wouldn't revert back to being meh anyways at least this is a shorter comittment.
Mehar
Analyst
Posts: 3,721
And1: 2,304
Joined: Apr 23, 2012
Location: Toronto, ON

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#72 » by Mehar » Tue Nov 7, 2023 2:12 pm

Teoscar Hernandez did not receive a Qualifying Offer, and is now a free agent. I would not mind the Jays signing him and bringing him back as DH. 3 years max at 50 million range is the ballpark I would look at. If another team offers him 4 years and close to the 20 million his agent was looking for, then I would look elsewhere.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 40,603
And1: 13,515
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#73 » by dagger » Tue Nov 7, 2023 2:27 pm

Mehar wrote:Teoscar Hernandez did not receive a Qualifying Offer, and is now a free agent. I would not mind the Jays signing him and bringing him back as DH. 3 years max at 50 million range is the ballpark I would look at. If another team offers him 4 years and close to the 20 million his agent was looking for, then I would look elsewhere.

The problem is you will want Springer to DH more, and others to get their DH days as well. And Teoscar is a right handed bat like Springer and Vlad. At least Belt was a left handed bat


Sent from my iPhone using RealGM Forums
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
polo007
General Manager
Posts: 8,560
And1: 2,653
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#74 » by polo007 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 4:21 pm

Read on Twitter
polo007
General Manager
Posts: 8,560
And1: 2,653
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#75 » by polo007 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 5:29 pm

Read on Twitter
Balki-B
Sophomore
Posts: 232
And1: 34
Joined: Nov 29, 2010

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#76 » by Balki-B » Tue Nov 7, 2023 7:50 pm

What an ominous double post with no actual tweet.
Randle McMurphy
RealGM
Posts: 34,362
And1: 19,430
Joined: Dec 07, 2009

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#77 » by Randle McMurphy » Tue Nov 7, 2023 10:50 pm

Read on Twitter


Season's over early.
One flew east, one flew west, one flew over the cuckoo’s nest.
polo007
General Manager
Posts: 8,560
And1: 2,653
Joined: Nov 02, 2006

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#78 » by polo007 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 10:57 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
SharoneWright
RealGM
Posts: 27,482
And1: 12,525
Joined: Aug 03, 2006
Location: A low-variance future conducive to raising children
     

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#79 » by SharoneWright » Tue Nov 7, 2023 11:47 pm

Randle McMurphy wrote:
Read on Twitter


Season's over early.


ha ha.

seriously, though. that's really odd. it was an easy bone to throw to the fans, whether it makes any material difference or just as an empty gesture. he was the lowest of the low hanging fruit.
Is anybody here a marine biologist?
User avatar
Madvillainy2004
Head Coach
Posts: 7,354
And1: 7,247
Joined: Jul 03, 2019
       

Re: 23/24 Offseason Thread 

Post#80 » by Madvillainy2004 » Tue Nov 7, 2023 11:54 pm

polo007 wrote:
Read on Twitter


A dinosaur that doesn't believe in pulling the ball and launch angle having MORE influence on our hitting approach lmao.

Return to Toronto Blue Jays