Official Week 1 Thread (Primetime)

Post #201 » by **Stanford** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 1:56 am

Grant runs for like 60 yards and theyre talking about rodgers great game management.

f that

Post #202 » by **HMFFL** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:15 am

Will see what Jackson is made of right here and how well Minnesota can do on offense with 1:50 left.

NeedsMoreCheese · Post #203 » by **NeedsMoreCheese** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:17 am

Nice job getting away with the horsecollar.

MadCityBucky · Post #204 » by **MadCityBucky** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:17 am

Packers WIN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Post #205 » by **HMFFL** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:17 am

and we just saw it...INT!

mbucks22 · Post #206 » by **mbucks22** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:19 am

That was not a horsecollar tackle. Even if it would've been, they better not call it. Especially after the "leverage" call. Christ these refs were awful.

MadCityBucky · Post #207 » by **MadCityBucky** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:19 am

What now, experts? Even with all these stupid penalties, Packers won.

NeedsMoreCheese · Post #208 » by **NeedsMoreCheese** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:20 am

mbucks22 wrote:That was not a horsecollar tackle. Even if it would've been, they better not call it. Especially after the "leverage" call. Christ these refs were awful.

Typical.

Jose7 · Post #209 » by **Jose7** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:20 am

Game 2!

MadCityBucky · Post #210 » by **MadCityBucky** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:21 am

Ok, now I need about 24 fantasy points from Selvin Young (A Brian Westbrook game) or I lose

casey · Post #211 » by **casey** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:23 am

Kohl Is A Mome wrote:Nice job getting away with the horsecollar.

I love how they implement the rule and then refuse to enforce it. How could that not have been called? I'm sure Jackson would've blown it anyways, but why have the rule if you don't ever call it?

mbucks22 · Post #212 » by **mbucks22** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:24 am

Kohl Is A Mome wrote:
mbucks22 wrote:That was not a horsecollar tackle. Even if it would've been, they better not call it. Especially after the "leverage" call. Christ these refs were awful.

Typical.

And you ignore that the refs called a "leverage" foul. Typical. See you Week 3 Cowgirl fan.

Post #213 » by **studcrackers** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:26 am

i got 128 points and still got selvyn young and tony scheffler, id like both to prove to me they deserve to be playing

casey · Post #214 » by **casey** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:30 am

mbucks22 wrote:
Kohl Is A Mome wrote:
mbucks22 wrote:That was not a horsecollar tackle. Even if it would've been, they better not call it. Especially after the "leverage" call. Christ these refs were awful.

Typical.

And you ignore that the refs called a "leverage" foul. Typical. See you Week 3 Cowgirl fan.

Ignore? That's a penalty. It may sound weak, but you can't jump up on your own guy to try to block a kick.

MadCityBucky · Post #215 » by **MadCityBucky** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:31 am

If you're going to talk about a horsecollar penalty, what about the ineligible receiver when Driver already had the ball and ran 30 yards down the field? That cost the Packers a TD.

Don't use the refs as an effin' excuse.

Mr Smoke Weed · Post #216 » by **Mr Smoke Weed** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:32 am

as a bears fan i was definitely happy how the vikes and packers looked

casey · Post #217 » by **casey** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:35 am

MadCityBucky wrote:If you're going to talk about a horsecollar penalty, what about the ineligible receiver when Driver already had the ball and ran 30 yards down the field? That cost the Packers a TD.

Don't use the refs as an effin' excuse.

He ran downfield immediately, thinking it was a run. That was a penalty too, pretty obviously.

I'm using my team's **** as an excuse for the loss, not the refs.

mbucks22 · Post #218 » by **mbucks22** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:35 am

Ignore? That's a penalty. It may sound weak, but you can't jump up on your own guy to try to block a kick.

And how often does that happen when trying to block a kick? Probably more often than not. We want to talk about bad calls, how about the pass interference on Harris? Berrian hooked the arm and then pushed off.

All I am seeing is excuses. We beat the Queens, that's all that matters. Never mind that Jackson just isn't that good of a QB or that they have one dimensional offense, it's all the refs fault. That going to be the excuse every week the Vikings lose?

I will admit that we did get away with a few interference calls though. The refs were just bad going both ways.

MadCityBucky · Post #219 » by **MadCityBucky** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:38 am

casey wrote:
MadCityBucky wrote:If you're going to talk about a horsecollar penalty, what about the ineligible receiver when Driver already had the ball and ran 30 yards down the field? That cost the Packers a TD.

Don't use the refs as an effin' excuse.

He ran downfield immediately, thinking it was a run. That was a penalty too, pretty obviously.

I'm using my team's **** as an excuse for the loss, not the refs.

I thought your team was the pathetic 49ers

I'm done with the Vikes game, Packers won, Vikes lost. Now to destroy the Lions.

http://www.last.fm/user/DPF55 · Post #220 » by **Buck You** » Tue Sep 9, 2008 2:39 am

Jose7© wrote:
“Damn, that’s their problem,” Williams said. “They’re going through all that as a team, trying to figure out if Favre or (Aaron) Rodgers was the man, while we’ve got the same team we had all offseason. I’m glad they got all that darn press, ‘cause when we go down there it’ll be the kid’s first start and his first damn loss.”

Ahhhh man, MNF, can't wait.

LOL@ Pat Williams. Nice game you fat lard.