RealGM

Cardinals may have lost, but I hope this helped shut up those that think Kurt Warner is anything but Hall of Fame bound.

Point forward wrote:Instant eternal NFL pub question: if Warner does not have his 100 yd turnover, do the Cardinals win?

It would be very likely. They would be up 14-10 to start the 2nd half without having to overcome a 10 point deficit.

Game over! Steelers win!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

nitetrain8603 wrote:

GQStylin wrote:What a lame way to end it. Should have threw it up deep for the hail mary and see if Fitz or anyone else couldn't get it.

He tried to on that last play.

Should have tried it from the 1st down onwards, not the last down of the game. Throw it up a couple of times and see what happens, interception or fumble be damned.

Mags FTW wrote:Just because the ball went forward doesn't make it a pass.

The ball was going forward before he lost possession, which makes it a pass. And it doesn't even get reviewed? How? I don't get how they can blow a call so bad with 7 seconds left in the Super Bowl.

Al Michaels said it was reviewed and they confirmed the ruling on the field.

I will present the Pittsburgh Steelers the Vinve Lombardi Trophy. Congratulations on your success.

This superbowl was way better than Last Years

SD2042 wrote:I will present the Pittsburgh Steelers the Vinve Lombardi Trophy. Congratulations on your success.

Corniest post ever

I thought it was a fumble, but I'd be pissed if I were a Cardinals fan and that play wasn't reviewed.

11 penalties for 106 yards. Kinda hard to win a super bowl when you play that sloppy. What a heart-breaker.

Excuse me while I go remove the dagger from my heart.

Congrats to Pittsburgh, they proved all season they were the top of the AFC and now they are of the NFL.

But please ESPN, spare us of the dynasty talk for 2 straight weeks.

Gilbert0Arenas wrote:

SD2042 wrote:I will present the Pittsburgh Steelers the Vinve Lombardi Trophy. Congratulations on your success.

Corniest post ever

And?

No, Al Michaels said because they didn't review it on the field the men in the booth deemed it not worthy for review, but it's the job of the booth to deem whether a play is worthy of review or not, not judge whether it ought to be reviewed. McAulay never saw it.

MadCityBucky wrote:Al Michaels said it was reviewed and they confirmed the ruling on the field.

I wouldve reviewed a play for longer than 4 seconds with 3 seconds left in the superbowl

CJ_18 wrote:This superbowl was way better than Last Years

I loved last years also. The catch by David Tyree was epic.

deeney0 wrote:Cardinals may have lost, but I hope this helped shut up those that think Kurt Warner is anything but Hall of Fame bound.

Because he can throw the ball in Larry Fitzgerald's general direction and then watch him run?

And the superbowl MVP is...........

It's amazing how it went from such a boring game to such an entertaining game. Probably the most fun I've had watching a Super Bowl.

Wade2k6 wrote:And the superbowl MVP is...........

Holmes, not even close.