Jeff's 6.0 mock

Moderator: studcrackers

WAYSA
Banned User
Posts: 2,802
And1: 0
Joined: Jul 18, 2008

Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#1 » by WAYSA » Thu Mar 5, 2009 8:27 pm

Front page.

Love the Bears draft.

Maclin, Pat White, Luigs.

DHB to Denver was a bit of a surprise.
User avatar
hermes
RealGM
Posts: 93,310
And1: 24,568
Joined: Aug 27, 2007
Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
 

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#2 » by hermes » Thu Mar 5, 2009 8:47 pm

here's the link

i would probably cry tears of joy if the vikings got Mack
i'm good with the other picks as well, we need a T and some LB depth
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,573
And1: 35,023
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#3 » by ReasonablySober » Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:19 pm

Packers too biggest needs are at OT and OLB (pass rusher) and neither needs are filled in the first three rounds of this draft. I can understand nabbing Jenkins in the first and a lot of people are high on Gilbert as a DE in the 3-4, but then in the third they absolutely have to go with a pass rusher and an offensive tackle.

Instead of Rashad Johnson and Ashlee Palmer I'd go Cody Brown and Jamon Meredith.

CB: Malcolm Jenkins
DE: Jarron Gilbert
OLB/DE: Cody Brown
OT: Jamon Meredith

A haul like that in the first three rounds and I'm dancing. I'm all but sure that Brown will come off the board in the 2nd, though.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,744
And1: 228
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#4 » by sunshinekids99 » Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:37 pm

Can't say I would be happy at all as a New England fan.
Image
User avatar
Rafael122
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 20,052
And1: 2,779
Joined: Oct 11, 2004
       

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#5 » by Rafael122 » Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:53 pm

Man, I really wish the Redskins could work out a trade with New England or some other team with multiple picks in the first two rounds.

Iceness - quick question...out of all of these hybrid defensive end/linebackers, who has the most potential to be the best defensive end (not linebacker) but defensive end?
Bickerstaff: who's up for kickball?!!
Ed Wood: Only if it's the no-pants variety.
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,546
And1: 7,971
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#6 » by Celtics_Champs » Fri Mar 6, 2009 12:12 am

sunshinekids99 wrote:Can't say I would be happy at all as a New England fan.


Are you saying that because you are not liking the peppers rumors, or because of the two RB's we add with the picks.

Ic, this peppers thing is getting me excited, but if we were to get him, is that the end of the line for wilfork? I don't think I would like that. As for the picks, yeah two RB's just doesn't make sense considering the Patriots just signed Taylor.
User avatar
Manhattan Project
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 39,371
And1: 7,968
Joined: Feb 23, 2005
Location: The game ain't in me no more. None of it.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#7 » by Manhattan Project » Fri Mar 6, 2009 12:55 am

Cant complain about the Jets draft at all, three players that I love to get where we get them.
Jazz:
Allen l Wagner
Randle l Olynyk
Porter Jr l Marshall l Tucker
Herro l Okogie l Payton
Fox l Jones
User avatar
HeavyP
Starter
Posts: 2,072
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 22, 2003
Location: Bonney Lake, Washington
Contact:
     

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#8 » by HeavyP » Fri Mar 6, 2009 1:13 am

I believe you forgot Patrick Chung. Knowing this, I'd say you can pencil him in for Seattle's 2nd round pick, however Beatty isn't bad.

I really think Seattle would either a.) Still take Crabtree at that spot, b.) Take Malcolm Jenkins or trade out. I'm one of the few Seattle fans who would be okay with a QB right there but all the signings we've made have been 'win now' mode. Therefore, I doubt Seattle would be willing to pay 10 million for someone to sit on the bench. This is also my argument against drafting J.Smith. Crabtree and Jenkins would both play significant amount for Seattle.

I think BJ Raji is the best fit for them, it just doesn't fit Ruskell's mold. He doesn't draft people who haven't been consistent contributors for multiple years. He also doesn't deal with red flags on prospects well.
sunshinekids99
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,744
And1: 228
Joined: Apr 10, 2001

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#9 » by sunshinekids99 » Fri Mar 6, 2009 2:17 am

Celtics_Champs wrote:
sunshinekids99 wrote:Can't say I would be happy at all as a New England fan.


Are you saying that because you are not liking the peppers rumors, or because of the two RB's we add with the picks.

Ic, this peppers thing is getting me excited, but if we were to get him, is that the end of the line for wilfork? I don't think I would like that. As for the picks, yeah two RB's just doesn't make sense considering the Patriots just signed Taylor.


I'm all for Peppers, I'm saying if the actual picks for the Pats happening this way without a deal in place. The dual running back is just stupid and I'm assuming he just missed it. Not impressed with any of the picks for the Pats.

As for Peppers I think he's be a monster for the team, they would however need the money to keep Wilfork as well.
Image
Celtics_Champs
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 53,546
And1: 7,971
Joined: Jan 13, 2005
Location: TD Garden
 

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#10 » by Celtics_Champs » Fri Mar 6, 2009 3:08 am

sunshinekids99 wrote:
I'm all for Peppers, I'm saying if the actual picks for the Pats happening this way without a deal in place. The dual running back is just stupid and I'm assuming he just missed it. Not impressed with any of the picks for the Pats.

As for Peppers I think he's be a monster for the team, they would however need the money to keep Wilfork as well.


Just wondering. I agree.

Connor Barwin doesn't really excite me.
Gator Mike
Junior
Posts: 383
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 28, 2004

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#11 » by Gator Mike » Fri Mar 6, 2009 5:21 pm

I'd much rather sign Jason Taylor for far less cash than trade draft picks and hand out a huge deal to Peppers.

...and yeah, drafting two RBs in the 2nd round is really ridiculous.
User avatar
deeney0
RealGM
Posts: 10,594
And1: 9
Joined: Jan 26, 2005
Location: Cambridge, MA

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#12 » by deeney0 » Fri Mar 6, 2009 5:27 pm

hermes wrote:i would probably cry tears of joy if the vikings got Mack


Agreed. Gotta be #1 on the Vikes board, I'd be O.K. with moving up a bit to get him if it came to that.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,573
And1: 35,023
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#13 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Mar 6, 2009 5:58 pm

I like Mack, but this is the best center class I can remember. I'd rather take a position with less depth in round one and go with Unger, Luigs, Wood, Caldwell or Shipley later.

But if you Vikes fans want your team to take Mack, I'll help you start a petition and a grass roots campaign. :)
User avatar
Da Schwab
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 33,822
And1: 3,619
Joined: Apr 19, 2005
Location: Somewhere in the between.
Contact:
       

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#14 » by Da Schwab » Fri Mar 6, 2009 6:00 pm

Breaking my heart, Ic. From Cook and Beckum, to Britt and Beckum.
Boneman2
General Manager
Posts: 8,205
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Location: Indy
       

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#15 » by Boneman2 » Fri Mar 6, 2009 6:00 pm

My gut instinct is that the Colts would add offense in the first. They have always done it in the past when everyone clearly thought they'd go defense. Looking at Addai and Rhodes I have my reservations because neither are the long term answer. They might as well give Peyton another weapon before he's done. For me it would be either Wells or Harvin.

In the second and third I don't see Indy selecting any DB's, they are solid here and return the same cast that gave up only six passing td's last season. They'll focus on the front seven in the 2nd ( Brace)and 3rd rounds, while adding depth to the O-line later.
"A man who fears suffering is already suffering from what he fears." -Michel de Montaigne
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 98,573
And1: 35,023
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#16 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Mar 6, 2009 7:34 pm

I think it's interesting that the Colts are having Sanchez in for a look.
mtl02002
Ballboy
Posts: 14
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 12, 2006

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#17 » by mtl02002 » Fri Mar 6, 2009 8:21 pm

After quick glance at this the one thing i really disagree on is Donald Brown falling into the 3rd round.
VCRJKidd15
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,293
And1: 128
Joined: Mar 10, 2006

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#18 » by VCRJKidd15 » Fri Mar 6, 2009 10:22 pm

i doubt the eagles will draft a TE for there first pick. They will deffinitly draft Beanie Wells
daddyfivestar
Banned User
Posts: 5,215
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 19, 2004
Location: Get to 17 while they are still on 17

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#19 » by daddyfivestar » Fri Mar 6, 2009 11:53 pm

Scott McKillop is going to have a damn hard time making two teams.
Icness
NFL Analyst
Posts: 16,964
And1: 129
Joined: Apr 30, 2001
Location: Back in the 616
Contact:
   

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock 

Post#20 » by Icness » Sat Mar 7, 2009 1:25 pm

daddyfivestar wrote:Scott McKillop is going to have a damn hard time making two teams.


Fixed. I thought I was just seeing double :oops:
It's not whether you win or lose, it's how good you look playing the game

Return to NFL Draft