Page 1 of 3

Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 8:27 pm
by WAYSA
Front page.

Love the Bears draft.

Maclin, Pat White, Luigs.

DHB to Denver was a bit of a surprise.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 8:47 pm
by hermes
here's the link

i would probably cry tears of joy if the vikings got Mack
i'm good with the other picks as well, we need a T and some LB depth

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:19 pm
by ReasonablySober
Packers too biggest needs are at OT and OLB (pass rusher) and neither needs are filled in the first three rounds of this draft. I can understand nabbing Jenkins in the first and a lot of people are high on Gilbert as a DE in the 3-4, but then in the third they absolutely have to go with a pass rusher and an offensive tackle.

Instead of Rashad Johnson and Ashlee Palmer I'd go Cody Brown and Jamon Meredith.

CB: Malcolm Jenkins
DE: Jarron Gilbert
OLB/DE: Cody Brown
OT: Jamon Meredith

A haul like that in the first three rounds and I'm dancing. I'm all but sure that Brown will come off the board in the 2nd, though.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:37 pm
by sunshinekids99
Can't say I would be happy at all as a New England fan.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 11:53 pm
by Rafael122
Man, I really wish the Redskins could work out a trade with New England or some other team with multiple picks in the first two rounds.

Iceness - quick question...out of all of these hybrid defensive end/linebackers, who has the most potential to be the best defensive end (not linebacker) but defensive end?

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 12:12 am
by Celtics_Champs
sunshinekids99 wrote:Can't say I would be happy at all as a New England fan.


Are you saying that because you are not liking the peppers rumors, or because of the two RB's we add with the picks.

Ic, this peppers thing is getting me excited, but if we were to get him, is that the end of the line for wilfork? I don't think I would like that. As for the picks, yeah two RB's just doesn't make sense considering the Patriots just signed Taylor.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 12:55 am
by Manhattan Project
Cant complain about the Jets draft at all, three players that I love to get where we get them.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 1:13 am
by HeavyP
I believe you forgot Patrick Chung. Knowing this, I'd say you can pencil him in for Seattle's 2nd round pick, however Beatty isn't bad.

I really think Seattle would either a.) Still take Crabtree at that spot, b.) Take Malcolm Jenkins or trade out. I'm one of the few Seattle fans who would be okay with a QB right there but all the signings we've made have been 'win now' mode. Therefore, I doubt Seattle would be willing to pay 10 million for someone to sit on the bench. This is also my argument against drafting J.Smith. Crabtree and Jenkins would both play significant amount for Seattle.

I think BJ Raji is the best fit for them, it just doesn't fit Ruskell's mold. He doesn't draft people who haven't been consistent contributors for multiple years. He also doesn't deal with red flags on prospects well.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 2:17 am
by sunshinekids99
Celtics_Champs wrote:
sunshinekids99 wrote:Can't say I would be happy at all as a New England fan.


Are you saying that because you are not liking the peppers rumors, or because of the two RB's we add with the picks.

Ic, this peppers thing is getting me excited, but if we were to get him, is that the end of the line for wilfork? I don't think I would like that. As for the picks, yeah two RB's just doesn't make sense considering the Patriots just signed Taylor.


I'm all for Peppers, I'm saying if the actual picks for the Pats happening this way without a deal in place. The dual running back is just stupid and I'm assuming he just missed it. Not impressed with any of the picks for the Pats.

As for Peppers I think he's be a monster for the team, they would however need the money to keep Wilfork as well.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 3:08 am
by Celtics_Champs
sunshinekids99 wrote:
I'm all for Peppers, I'm saying if the actual picks for the Pats happening this way without a deal in place. The dual running back is just stupid and I'm assuming he just missed it. Not impressed with any of the picks for the Pats.

As for Peppers I think he's be a monster for the team, they would however need the money to keep Wilfork as well.


Just wondering. I agree.

Connor Barwin doesn't really excite me.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 5:21 pm
by Gator Mike
I'd much rather sign Jason Taylor for far less cash than trade draft picks and hand out a huge deal to Peppers.

...and yeah, drafting two RBs in the 2nd round is really ridiculous.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 5:27 pm
by deeney0
hermes wrote:i would probably cry tears of joy if the vikings got Mack


Agreed. Gotta be #1 on the Vikes board, I'd be O.K. with moving up a bit to get him if it came to that.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 5:58 pm
by ReasonablySober
I like Mack, but this is the best center class I can remember. I'd rather take a position with less depth in round one and go with Unger, Luigs, Wood, Caldwell or Shipley later.

But if you Vikes fans want your team to take Mack, I'll help you start a petition and a grass roots campaign. :)

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 6:00 pm
by Da Schwab
Breaking my heart, Ic. From Cook and Beckum, to Britt and Beckum.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 6:00 pm
by Boneman2
My gut instinct is that the Colts would add offense in the first. They have always done it in the past when everyone clearly thought they'd go defense. Looking at Addai and Rhodes I have my reservations because neither are the long term answer. They might as well give Peyton another weapon before he's done. For me it would be either Wells or Harvin.

In the second and third I don't see Indy selecting any DB's, they are solid here and return the same cast that gave up only six passing td's last season. They'll focus on the front seven in the 2nd ( Brace)and 3rd rounds, while adding depth to the O-line later.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 7:34 pm
by ReasonablySober
I think it's interesting that the Colts are having Sanchez in for a look.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 8:21 pm
by mtl02002
After quick glance at this the one thing i really disagree on is Donald Brown falling into the 3rd round.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 10:22 pm
by VCRJKidd15
i doubt the eagles will draft a TE for there first pick. They will deffinitly draft Beanie Wells

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 11:53 pm
by daddyfivestar
Scott McKillop is going to have a damn hard time making two teams.

Re: Jeff's 6.0 mock

Posted: Sat Mar 7, 2009 1:25 pm
by Icness
daddyfivestar wrote:Scott McKillop is going to have a damn hard time making two teams.


Fixed. I thought I was just seeing double :oops: