whatisacenter wrote:CDM_Stats wrote:whatisacenter wrote:Who is up in their feelings?
My comment "uh, you the coach" was what CP said to a reporter about coming off the bench. My point is, I have no idea what his role is going to be and neither do you.
Let me check the Draymond thread and get back to you on feelings
Draymond has nothing to do with this....
But....yes, I don't like Draymond the person and I also don't think extending Draymond the player for 4 years was a smart move. Two things can be equally true and not dependent of each other. You seem to think my opinion, which differs from yours, must be due to "feelings" which is a load of crap.
Ok fair, you're right. And I misread into that CP3 quote, I forgot that CP3 had said that specifically... I guess I'm still wondering what the hell was confusing about the word 'role' from before. So my fault there. But I mean cmon, he's stepping directly into Poole's role.. and Podz is the only non-Steph guard on the roster guaranteed beyond this season. I didnt even have to use my tarot cards on this one. And thats not directed at you
*that said*.. it goes beyond differing opinions. And you know this. People have asked what your plan would be, and it was grim. It was a white flag for this year at minimum, 2 years most likely, and trying to build around a 36 year old Curry sans Draymond and Klay with little money or assets to do anything with. If this core is too old now, why wouldnt a Curry core be too old in 2025-26? Or even a 35 y/o Curry in 24-25, where we don't have any picks currently?
I dont think getting rid of a top 20 impact player - and that's almost universal across every metric or tracking device - is an opinion based on cold logic. Especially when he signed a deal that specifically helps the team's future moves, as well as that 4th year quite likely being a stretch waive situation, barring 3 straight years of contention