ImageImage

Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25, humanrefutation

MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#381 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:47 pm

skones wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
skones wrote:
That's not what's happening here. In fact, no one is saying Watson is good. We're pointing to specific plays. You're just being stubborn and refusing to acknowledge them because you don't like to blame Jordan Love for anything. That's why when asked if you think he should jump higher by insisting that was an actual contested catch "opportunity" you came over the top with rando tweets like I can't find a million of them that say Jordan Love can't hit the broad side of a barn.


How many times do I have to say this has absolutely nothing to do with Jordan Love. Several of these plays are contested because of a bad throw by Love. I'm comparing Watson to the other WRs on the roster who are also playing with Jordan Love. Jordan Love is a constant in this equation for every WR.


You were all about aDOT affecting completion percentage earlier this year, and Watson leads that category with players with 30 or more targets this season by a WIDE margin. But that doesn't fit your narrative, so you've thrown that out, equalized all route trees and opportunities among all receivers even though that's not a thing, and pointed explicitly to a rating when targeted, and ignored context.

Receivers DON'T receive the same type of targets. That's why they have different names, X, Z, and slot.

Watson isn't good. He's an athletic dude who can run in a straight line. That's his skill set. Love struggles down field, he struggles on the boundary, and we saw what an accurate QB who had his own issues because of injury, make use of that skill set last season. The blame falls on both, but blindly just attributing it to Watson being bad, as stated, ignores the other side of the coin.


adot absolutely matters but it's not as if Watson is only struggling on downfield throws and routes. If he was that'd be one thing but he's also struggled on short and medium targets too. As RonSwanson correctly pointed out Watson has basically been useless on anything other than slants or when he's wide open. Other WRs haven't had that problem

Also fun fact Reed has more targets of 20+ yards than Watson does and has had a much higher success rate.

On passes of 20+ more air yards Watson still has the lowest success rate

Reed 6/12
Watson 2/10
Musgrave 4/7
Doubs 2/8
Wicks 1/3
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#382 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:50 pm

To add more context on medium throws (10-19 yards)

Reed 4/7
Watson 4/11
Musgrave 2/4
Doubs 11/22
Wicks 9/14

Watson has been the worst both on deep and medium throws
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#383 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 10:54 pm

Just for fun, also adding throws less than 10 yards

Reed 13/19
Watson 6/10
Musgrave 14/19
Doubs 15/21
Wicks 6/9

Watson has been the worst target at every single level
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,881
And1: 19,684
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#384 » by WeekapaugGroove » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:23 pm

Id be careful drawing to hard of conclusions with those sample sizes.

I don't think Watson has been any good but I have to admit after watching the individual plays I was maybe a little too hard on him.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#385 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:27 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:Id be careful drawing to hard of conclusions with those sample sizes.

I don't think Watson has been any good but I have to admit after watching the individual plays I was maybe a little too hard on him.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


I'm certainly not writing Watson off. But I think it's safe to say through the first 9 games he's been the worst of their pass catchers. I also have been extremely impressed with Wicks and would like to see him get more of an opportunity which likely comes at Watson's expense
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,266
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#386 » by skones » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:28 pm

We'll just ignore that Jordan Love has a tendency to force throws on Watson that he doesn't with other receivers.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 99,148
And1: 35,305
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#387 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:30 pm

MVP2110 wrote:adot absolutely matters but it's not as if Watson is only struggling on downfield throws and routes. If he was that'd be one thing but he's also struggled on short and medium targets too. As RonSwanson correctly pointed out Watson has basically been useless on anything other than slants or when he's wide open. Other WRs haven't had that problem


Absolutely not true. He had a drop on an easy one against Pittsburgh. Otherwise he's caught anything that wasn't knocked away or uncatchable.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 99,148
And1: 35,305
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#388 » by ReasonablySober » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:31 pm

skones wrote:We'll just ignore that Jordan Love has a tendency to force throws on Watson that he doesn't with other receivers.


Yup. Watson is an X and is being thrown the balls that Love is worst at.
WeekapaugGroove
RealGM
Posts: 23,881
And1: 19,684
Joined: Feb 07, 2010

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#389 » by WeekapaugGroove » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:32 pm

MVP2110 wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Id be careful drawing to hard of conclusions with those sample sizes.

I don't think Watson has been any good but I have to admit after watching the individual plays I was maybe a little too hard on him.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


I'm certainly not writing Watson off. But I think it's safe to say through the first 9 games he's been the worst of their pass catchers. I also have been extremely impressed with Wicks and would like to see him get more of an opportunity which likely comes at Watson's expense
I think Musgrave has the highest ceiling if he can figure out how to not turn into a baby deer learning to walk when he gets a pass his way.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app
Life should not be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside in a cloud of smoke, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming Wow! What a Ride!-H.S.T.
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#390 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:32 pm

skones wrote:We'll just ignore that Jordan Love has a tendency to force throws on Watson that he doesn't with other receivers.


Jordan Love should absolutely stop forcing throws to Watson and give other guys a chance in those situations. We agree on that. One of Love's biggest flaws imo is the trust he seemingly has in Watson & Doubs and forces alot to them.
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#391 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:36 pm

ReasonablySober wrote:
skones wrote:We'll just ignore that Jordan Love has a tendency to force throws on Watson that he doesn't with other receivers.


Yup. Watson is an X and is being thrown the balls that Love is worst at.


You also assume that on all of these attempts Watson is where he's supposed to be. Again from what I've heard he by far leads the team in incorrect routes run and is often lazy with his route running at that. I obviously don't have any numbers to back that up or show exactly how it's effected things but I don't really give Watson the benefit of the doubt
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
MVP2110
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,991
And1: 3,135
Joined: Jun 28, 2012
Location: Appleton WI
       

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#392 » by MVP2110 » Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:39 pm

WeekapaugGroove wrote:
MVP2110 wrote:
WeekapaugGroove wrote:Id be careful drawing to hard of conclusions with those sample sizes.

I don't think Watson has been any good but I have to admit after watching the individual plays I was maybe a little too hard on him.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


I'm certainly not writing Watson off. But I think it's safe to say through the first 9 games he's been the worst of their pass catchers. I also have been extremely impressed with Wicks and would like to see him get more of an opportunity which likely comes at Watson's expense
I think Musgrave has the highest ceiling if he can figure out how to not turn into a baby deer learning to walk when he gets a pass his way.

Sent from my SM-F731U using RealGM mobile app


Yea it's easy to be excited about the Rookie targets. Musgrave Wicks & Reed all have looked really good for rookies imo
Coach Drew: "Milwaukee has always been a team that I have been intrigued by. When we played them, they were a tough team for us to play. Although we did beat them all four times"
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 22,932
And1: 9,407
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#393 » by M-C-G » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:12 am

If I am throwing a contested catch ball (theoretically)

Davante Adams (I know I know)







Doubs
Reed

Wicks
Toure
Musgrave


Watson

And if I am throwing a guy into space you can flip the bottom two guys to the top. We aren’t using guys right and that is on Love and MLF and I’ll take a second to also crap on the O line. This offense is meant to be set up by a strong running game and that part of the game hasn’t been up to par


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,106
And1: 1,977
Joined: May 27, 2005

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#394 » by stillgotgame » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:38 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
skones wrote:We'll just ignore that Jordan Love has a tendency to force throws on Watson that he doesn't with other receivers.


Yup. Watson is an X and is being thrown the balls that Love is worst at.


Clown post as usual. Look at all of Watson's incompletions, not just the one's that fit your agenda.
Read on Twitter
?s=20
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 99,148
And1: 35,305
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#395 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:40 am

stillgotgame wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
skones wrote:We'll just ignore that Jordan Love has a tendency to force throws on Watson that he doesn't with other receivers.


Yup. Watson is an X and is being thrown the balls that Love is worst at.


Clown post as usual. Look at all of Watson's incompletions, not just the one's that fit your agenda.


I literally went through every single incompletion last night. Outside of exactly one pass from the Steelers game, if the ball was remotely in his vicinity (like, within five yards) and he didn't come down with it, you saw it on the last three pages. The rest are completions.
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 99,148
And1: 35,305
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#396 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:45 am

I charted every single throw his way. There was post about it and everything. When it was questioned I posted all the videos of every pass marked as one he could have came down with but didn't. It made PFF look like a clown show, sure, but you can't say I wasn't thorough.
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,106
And1: 1,977
Joined: May 27, 2005

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#397 » by stillgotgame » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:47 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
stillgotgame wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
Yup. Watson is an X and is being thrown the balls that Love is worst at.


Clown post as usual. Look at all of Watson's incompletions, not just the one's that fit your agenda.


I literally went through every single incompletion last night. Outside of excactly one pass from the Steelers game, if the ball was remotely in his vicinity (like, within five yards) and he didn't come down with it, you saw it on the last three pages. The rest are completions.


So you skipped the drop after Watson bizarrely ran 6 yards down field on a 3rd and 8, show it then.

How about the slant on 1st and 10 with 8:02 left in the second quarter that Watson alligator armed?

That's right, they don't fit your agenda.




Read on Twitter
?s=20
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 99,148
And1: 35,305
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#398 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:48 am

stillgotgame wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
stillgotgame wrote:
Clown post as usual. Look at all of Watson's incompletions, not just the one's that fit your agenda.


I literally went through every single incompletion last night. Outside of excactly one pass from the Steelers game, if the ball was remotely in his vicinity (like, within five yards) and he didn't come down with it, you saw it on the last three pages. The rest are completions.


So you skipped the drop after Watson bizarrely ran 6 yards down field on a 3rd and 8, show it then.

How about the slant on 1st and 10 with 8:02 left in the second quarter that Watson alligator armed?

That's right, they don't fit your agenda.


In what games?
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 99,148
And1: 35,305
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#399 » by ReasonablySober » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:50 am

It's bizarre that I'm accused of being anti-Love after being a huge defender of him and the pick for three years, and during the draft my position on 2nd round players was ANYONE BUT CHRISTIAN WATSON.
stillgotgame
Analyst
Posts: 3,106
And1: 1,977
Joined: May 27, 2005

Re: Game 9: Packers at Steelers - 11/12/23 - Noon - CBS 

Post#400 » by stillgotgame » Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:51 am

ReasonablySober wrote:
stillgotgame wrote:
ReasonablySober wrote:
I literally went through every single incompletion last night. Outside of excactly one pass from the Steelers game, if the ball was remotely in his vicinity (like, within five yards) and he didn't come down with it, you saw it on the last three pages. The rest are completions.


So you skipped the drop after Watson bizarrely ran 6 yards down field on a 3rd and 8, show it then.

How about the slant on 1st and 10 with 8:02 left in the second quarter that Watson alligator armed?

That's right, they don't fit your agenda.


In what games?


Steelers, 2nd quarter.




Read on Twitter
?s=20

Return to Green Bay Packers