ImageImageImageImage

Which franchiser would you rather have that's not Asante?

Moderator: Parliament10

What franchiser would you rather have?

 
Total votes: 0

User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

Which franchiser would you rather have that's not Asante? 

Post#1 » by Pierce 4 3 » Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:46 pm

I personally would want Freeney. I despise him because he's on the Colts and I hate the Colts more than I hate Yankees! But we would be unstoppable with Seymour,Freeney, Bruschi, Vrabel, Wilfork, Warren, Thomas and Colvin!
I'd move him to linebacker, because Warren, Wilfork and Seymour is a nasty front line. We'd have to keep Colvin at backup but it'd be worth it.

P.S. I'm saying if you could have that franchise player for free, without trading anything or anyone
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#2 » by Pierce 4 3 » Fri Apr 13, 2007 5:20 pm

I would take Lance Briggs as a backup plan
alwayslovetheceltics
Analyst
Posts: 3,086
And1: 6
Joined: Feb 08, 2006

 

Post#3 » by alwayslovetheceltics » Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:22 pm

Pierce 4 3 wrote:I would take Lance Briggs as a backup plan


I don't know which one I would most want, but Briggs is the least.
1. overrated
2. too small to play in our 3-4
User avatar
Pierce 4 3
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,710
And1: 0
Joined: Apr 09, 2007
Location: Wherever there is money to steal

 

Post#4 » by Pierce 4 3 » Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:44 pm

alwayslovetheceltics wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



I don't know which one I would most want, but Briggs is the least.
1. overrated
2. too small to play in our 3-4


Yeah, that's true. but he's the only linebacker. I picked Freeney to change to linebacker because he's fast and could pass off as a linebacker.

We need linebackers obviously because we got old guys. Bruschi and Vrabel.

Return to New England Patriots