Topofthekey wrote:Scoot McGroot wrote:Wizop wrote:
If so, chosing 8 over 9 says they had clear preference for Walker over Hendricks.
Could be. Or the offers were pretty similar and it's always better to be sooner than later.
Such a strange trade though. Feels like Wizards should have just stood their ground (and threaten to take Walker at 8 if we let someone else take Coulibaly at 7). But I'm happy Pacers got 2 SRPs for free
Could. But what if Utah jumped up from 9 to 7 to take Coulibaly? Sure, Washington could take Walker at 8, but Indy may have felt just as comfortable to take Hendricks at 9 themselves.