Tank Williams
Moderator: HMFFL
Tank Williams
- FNQ
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 62,963
- And1: 20,007
- Joined: Jul 16, 2006
- Location: EOL 6/23
Tank Williams
I'm usually not big on signing problematic castoffs... but it looks like the Bears moved a bit premature on this one, and it could be our benefit... our line (O and D) need the most work than anything, and landing Tank can literally solve one of those problems... I'd be working the phones if I was Al Davis.
- carnie100
- Junior
- Posts: 264
- And1: 0
- Joined: Feb 27, 2006
- Location: California
When he was released I gave it some thought. But now after looking at the current situation, bad idea.
Back in the day we all know the Raiders were known for signing guys with somewhat bad reputations. That's when the Raiders were good though. When they were at the top of their game. Plus back then the media wasn't able to badlight a team so much.
Nowadays, bad reputations spotlight your team in so much more of a bad light. And I feel like taking a guy with a bad rep like Tank Williams will only hurt this franchise more. The past 3 years have been miserable, let's not give the media giants anything else to criticize our team about.
Back in the day we all know the Raiders were known for signing guys with somewhat bad reputations. That's when the Raiders were good though. When they were at the top of their game. Plus back then the media wasn't able to badlight a team so much.
Nowadays, bad reputations spotlight your team in so much more of a bad light. And I feel like taking a guy with a bad rep like Tank Williams will only hurt this franchise more. The past 3 years have been miserable, let's not give the media giants anything else to criticize our team about.