ImageImageImageImageImage

Trading Up For CJ...

Moderators: MHSL82, CalamityX12

User avatar
Harry Palmer
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,570
And1: 2,584
Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Location: It’s all a bit vague.

Trading Up For CJ... 

Post#1 » by Harry Palmer » Tue Apr 3, 2007 4:55 am

What are your thoughts, beyond YEAH! or NO WAY!!

Seriously, it would take something like the 11th, our second this year and next, and a 4th. Maybe more.

Do you do it? Do you add more? How much more?

And why do you do it, beyond the attraction of a big name?

If you don't do it, why not?
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

-Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
TMACFORMVP
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 18,947
And1: 161
Joined: Jun 30, 2006
Location: 9th Seed

 

Post#2 » by TMACFORMVP » Tue Apr 3, 2007 5:04 am

It depends on how much we give up, but I sure as hell would do it. IMO the best prospect in the draft. The guy will be something special and an immediate impact. He's athletic, tall, and leap out of the building and only 21 years old. I'll post some more reasons why later but got to go now.
HitMan52
Starter
Posts: 2,071
And1: 33
Joined: Jun 26, 2006
Location: 7th Banner to Chicago

 

Post#3 » by HitMan52 » Tue Apr 3, 2007 5:39 am

This is a very difficult decision due to the fact that WR that are drafted high do not really pan out. WR I would say have the highest risk out of all of the positions except for QB. Most of the top WR in the NFL were not even picked in the first round which include the two best in Chad Johnson and Steve Smith. Many people say that CJ is a sure thing but there is no such thing. I say we stay put and do trade up but we trade back into the 1st round like we did last year when we drafted Manny Lawson. And The WR I would really like if we do trade back into the second round is a toss up between Robert Meachem or Dwayne Bowe.
Hopper15
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,969
And1: 274
Joined: Mar 20, 2003
Location: Tried like the dickens

Re: Trading Up For CJ... 

Post#4 » by Hopper15 » Tue Apr 3, 2007 5:56 am

Harry Palmer wrote:Seriously, it would take something like the 11th, our second this year and next, and a 4th. Maybe more.

That's definitely in the ballpark with the draft value chart. It seems to me to be too much. We just need too much help in other areas. I would be in favor of moving up from 42 to get one of the second tier WR, while still getting a potential stud at 11. Something like 42 and 76 for 27 should do the trick. You still have four fourths to move up from 97 in the third, if necessary.
ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

 

Post#5 » by ticknyler » Tue Apr 3, 2007 6:00 am

i would give up a package of that sort, (11, 2nd round, 4th round and a 2nd next year), but would the lions or browns accept it. Other things to consised would be the amount of money we would have to fork over to a 2nd or 3rd overall pick. Another thing is we need to make sure we can get him, meaning do a draft day deal, dont trade it now and have the raiders screw us over just so they can say they did.
User avatar
rosevillekings916
Pro Prospect
Posts: 858
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 11, 2005
Location: Roseville, Ca

 

Post#6 » by rosevillekings916 » Tue Apr 3, 2007 2:20 pm

^^^^^^^Totally agree^^^^^^^
JDubJazz
Analyst
Posts: 3,156
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 19, 2005
Location: along for the ride
       

 

Post#7 » by JDubJazz » Tue Apr 3, 2007 5:44 pm

I would love to see the niners make a move to get CJ, but I don't see Nolan mortgaging the future to do it. Nolan has tried (until this offseason) to build the team through the draft and it would take a lot to get the raiders to give up #1 (which when all is said and done is where I think CJ will be taken). In my estimation it would require:

2007 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th
2008 1st, 2nd

Thats A LOT to give up for one guy, regardless of how good he is.
--J-Dub--
ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

 

Post#8 » by ticknyler » Wed Apr 4, 2007 2:31 am

will never take that much......the giants didnt even give up that much for Eli.....Giants gave up like a 1, 2, and like next years 1. And that was for a QB who who was supposed to be the best out of college in the last several years
GS Warriors 1
General Manager
Posts: 8,444
And1: 456
Joined: May 23, 2004
       

 

Post#9 » by GS Warriors 1 » Wed Apr 4, 2007 6:26 am

Sure I would like for it to happen but its pretty much got a 0.1% chance of happening. I think this is an organization that likes to build through the draft. I could see them trading into the late first round if they like someone that much.
JDubJazz
Analyst
Posts: 3,156
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 19, 2005
Location: along for the ride
       

 

Post#10 » by JDubJazz » Wed Apr 4, 2007 4:01 pm

ticknyler wrote:will never take that much......the giants didnt even give up that much for Eli.....Giants gave up like a 1, 2, and like next years 1. And that was for a QB who who was supposed to be the best out of college in the last several years


yes, but the Giants weren't picking 11th, they were picking 2nd or third.
--J-Dub--
ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

 

Post#11 » by ticknyler » Wed Apr 4, 2007 6:32 pm

they were picking 4th
JDubJazz
Analyst
Posts: 3,156
And1: 4
Joined: Jun 19, 2005
Location: along for the ride
       

 

Post#12 » by JDubJazz » Wed Apr 4, 2007 9:08 pm

ticknyler wrote:they were picking 4th


...still a huge difference from 4th to 11th. NFL teams have a formula for determining "fair value" for draft picks, and I remember reading somewhere earlier (sorry cant remember the link) that, in order to move up to get CJ, it would basically cost the niners their entire 07 draft plus a future #1. Thats just too steep a price.
--J-Dub--
User avatar
eight the Great
Analyst
Posts: 3,160
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 12, 2005
Location: Chillin' with Chick Hearn

 

Post#13 » by eight the Great » Thu Apr 5, 2007 3:00 am

he could still go #1 but prolly not


its just too much to give up
Image
ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

 

Post#14 » by ticknyler » Thu Apr 5, 2007 6:28 am

ya thats just some chart made up by jimmy johnson years ago........no one realistically would think Johnson is worth a whole teams draft or all ther piks
User avatar
UKF
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,810
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Contact:

 

Post#15 » by UKF » Thu Apr 5, 2007 7:12 am

I would give up a lot to get Johnson. I dont even think we could give enough without us looking stupid, giving up something that is key to out future. Picks okay...players with last names of Smith Gore or Davis. I would be a very happy fan if we could get Johnson, do i think it will happen? no. But i defititly would want it to happen just like probably any other niners fan.
User avatar
Rainmaker
Pro Prospect
Posts: 766
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 02, 2004

 

Post#16 » by Rainmaker » Thu Apr 5, 2007 6:45 pm

I'm not a big fan of trading up for CJ. As good as he may be, we still have more than a couple of big needs. They'd have to give up too much to move up to #1
God is a Red Sox fan
User avatar
Bac2Basics
RealGM
Posts: 13,588
And1: 3
Joined: Mar 03, 2001
Location: "Are you like a crazy person? I'm quite sure they will say so."
   

 

Post#17 » by Bac2Basics » Sun Apr 15, 2007 8:20 pm

Is there a place where you can see this draft pick trading chart that people talk about?
ticknyler
Junior
Posts: 450
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 10, 2005

 

Post#18 » by ticknyler » Mon Apr 16, 2007 4:28 am

its on nfl.com and nfldraftcountdown.com
BMiller52
RealGM
Posts: 10,403
And1: 0
Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Location: my house

 

Post#19 » by BMiller52 » Tue Apr 24, 2007 7:23 pm

The guys on ESPN just mentioned that we might trade up for him.
Image
User avatar
RIPskaterdude
RealGM
Posts: 91,822
And1: 36,523
Joined: Jul 10, 2003
Location: #MakeAmericaGreatAgain
   

 

Post#20 » by RIPskaterdude » Wed Apr 25, 2007 10:10 pm

The Lions are talking to teams in the 3-10 slots about trading down.
Image

Return to San Francisco 49ers