GS
CP3
Wiggins
Wash
Poole
Kuzma
Wash saves rids Poole Deal. Gambles Wiggins Raises play.
CP3 gets rerouted to contender
GS gets more offensive punch.
Heavy Luxury tax bill for 2 players in their prime
Poole is a known system fit.
Warriors Wash balance the deal
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Warriors Wash balance the deal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,101
- And1: 2,716
- Joined: Jun 24, 2001
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
- thejigglyroom
- Rookie
- Posts: 1,104
- And1: 1,207
- Joined: Nov 14, 2008
- Location: San Francisco
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
Warriorfan wrote:GS
CP3
Wiggins
Wash
Poole
Kuzma
Wash saves rids Poole Deal. Gambles Wiggins Raises play.
CP3 gets rerouted to contender
GS gets more offensive punch.
Heavy Luxury tax bill for 2 players in their prime
Poole is a known system fit.
So the Warriors go hard in the lux tax with the return of Poole of all players to what? Be a Play in team? What?
Ok
Nyk_Fatboy:
Carmelos better than durant, Lance stephensons better than harden, Wade, Wall, Derozan, Parker, Westbrick and i prefer antetokoumpo over Griffin, bosh and dirk but its debatable
Carmelos better than durant, Lance stephensons better than harden, Wade, Wall, Derozan, Parker, Westbrick and i prefer antetokoumpo over Griffin, bosh and dirk but its debatable
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,004
- And1: 5,937
- Joined: Mar 30, 2006
- Location: Whereever you go - there you are
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
The Warriors salary dumped Poole for reasons that haven't changed (and his play certainly didn't improve).
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,101
- And1: 2,716
- Joined: Jun 24, 2001
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
thejigglyroom wrote:Warriorfan wrote:GS
CP3
Wiggins
Wash
Poole
Kuzma
Wash saves rids Poole Deal. Gambles Wiggins Raises play.
CP3 gets rerouted to contender
GS gets more offensive punch.
Heavy Luxury tax bill for 2 players in their prime
Poole is a known system fit.
So the Warriors go hard in the lux tax with the return of Poole of all players to what? Be a Play in team? What?
Ok
When Green played warriors were 33-22 with a 6pt improvement in DRTG.
That means top 5 in Offense and Defense.
IMO more than play in.
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 12,882
- And1: 5,908
- Joined: Jan 21, 2017
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
Maybe least likely “reunion” in NBA
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
-
- Senior Mod - NBA Player Comparisons
- Posts: 28,615
- And1: 8,824
- Joined: Aug 14, 2004
- Location: South Florida
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
Even if there wasn't history, it would seem that GS should value cap space more than Washington who is currently in talent acquisition phase. Cap space is still valuable to the Wiz for "bring out your dead" trades and the like but Golden State has to watch their budget far more carefully. Thus logically Poole's longer contract is more of a burden to GS than Washington which makes this a difficult trade to make as the salary equity is going the wrong way.
“Most people use statistics like a drunk man uses a lamppost; more for support than illumination,” Andrew Lang.
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 32,502
- And1: 3,923
- Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
Yeah this is silly for a lot of reasons. GS doesn’t want or need (nor can we afford to take) Poole back.
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
- nate33
- Forum Mod - Wizards
- Posts: 67,378
- And1: 19,684
- Joined: Oct 28, 2002
Re: Warriors Wash balance the deal
I think we might be past the time where Chris Paul can be easily "rerouted to a contender" at a cost of $30M. There's just no way it makes sense to opt in on Paul's final deal. The moment that happens, he becomes a substantially negative-value liability.
Return to Trades and Transactions