Memphis/Chicago/Philly
Moderators: loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger, Trader_Joe
Memphis/Chicago/Philly
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,103
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Memphis/Chicago/Philly
Memphis Trade Breakdon
Incoming Players
Rodney Carney
Samuel Dalembert
Tyrus Thomas
Chicago #1 Pick
Outgoing Players
Hakim Warrick
Pau Gasol
Philadelphia Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Viktor Khryapa
Joakim Noah
Joe Smith
Outgoing Players
Rodney Carney
Samuel Dalembert
Chicago Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Hakim Warrick
Pau Gasol
Outgoing Players
Viktor Khryapa
Joakim Noah
Tyrus Thomas
Joe Smith
#1 pick
I haven't figured out where to include draft picks but I think Memphis will want the Chicago 1st rounder so I've included it in the trade. Not sure about the Sixers.
Why: Chicago gets a low post presence and a back-up, athletic PF to replace Thomas. Chicago basically gives up Thomas & Noah for Gasol. Warrick was included to compensate them for their #1 pick.
Why for Memphis: Memphis gets a young athletic PF, a defensive oriented center in Dalembert, a SF prospect in Carney & Chicago's #1. Helps rebuild into the team Iavaroni wants.
Why for Philly: Philly trades Dalembert but receives Noah who can play center. Khrypa is expiring & Smith is a useful veteran with one remaining year on his contract. Philly also picks up around 4 million in cap space next year for facilitating this deal for Chicago & Memphis.
Incoming Players
Rodney Carney
Samuel Dalembert
Tyrus Thomas
Chicago #1 Pick
Outgoing Players
Hakim Warrick
Pau Gasol
Philadelphia Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Viktor Khryapa
Joakim Noah
Joe Smith
Outgoing Players
Rodney Carney
Samuel Dalembert
Chicago Trade Breakdown
Incoming Players
Hakim Warrick
Pau Gasol
Outgoing Players
Viktor Khryapa
Joakim Noah
Tyrus Thomas
Joe Smith
#1 pick
I haven't figured out where to include draft picks but I think Memphis will want the Chicago 1st rounder so I've included it in the trade. Not sure about the Sixers.
Why: Chicago gets a low post presence and a back-up, athletic PF to replace Thomas. Chicago basically gives up Thomas & Noah for Gasol. Warrick was included to compensate them for their #1 pick.
Why for Memphis: Memphis gets a young athletic PF, a defensive oriented center in Dalembert, a SF prospect in Carney & Chicago's #1. Helps rebuild into the team Iavaroni wants.
Why for Philly: Philly trades Dalembert but receives Noah who can play center. Khrypa is expiring & Smith is a useful veteran with one remaining year on his contract. Philly also picks up around 4 million in cap space next year for facilitating this deal for Chicago & Memphis.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,116
- And1: 0
- Joined: Dec 30, 2005
I don't see any reason Memphis would do this. Thomas may be better than Warrick but not by far, but they trade away Gasol to get Dalembert and a mid 1st? (which is where Chicago's pick should be once they get Gasol)
Daly is not old, but he's not really that young anymore, and has pretty much reached his ceiling.
Daly is not old, but he's not really that young anymore, and has pretty much reached his ceiling.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
corwin wrote:Well this deal would leave Memphis with:
PG: Conley/Lowry
SG: Mike Miller/JCN
SF: Gay/Warrick
PF: Ty Thomas/Stromile Smith
C: Dalembert/Darko
I think this team would run & be fun to watch. You'd have at least your own lottery pick to add to the mix.
Cliff Levingston can never understand why people don't consider this aspect when considering trades like this. If Cliff Levingston is the one with a star player who's marginalized on a floundering team, he tries to get some young talent and cap relief back, but he also tries to make sure that the package he gets back doesn't improve his chances of winning this year. The draft is the easiest place to get your best players so might as well maximize the chance of getting the best player available in the draft.
But the point remains that Chicago won't trade both it's young big men in a trade for (probably) anyone. Their value is severely depleted right now due to a lack of playing time; they're both MUCH better than the common non-Bulls fan gives them credit for. Either we get something close to what their value is to us or we'd be better off just passing on deal.
After this deal, we're left with Gasol/Wallace/Gray/Nocioni/Warrick in the front court without enough room under the luxury tax limit to re-sign both Deng and Gordon and without a draft pick with which to draft a replacement. We'd probably look like this in '08-'09 after this deal:
1. Hinrich, J. Curry
2. Sefolosha, sh*tty FA, Griffin
3. Deng, Nocioni
4. Gasol, Warrick
5. Wallace, Gray
Considering how Hinrich is not a scorer, that's a pathetic scoring back court with very little outside shooting ability. Not to mention Wallace will be further declined and the only consolation would be if we can trade him for something of value when he's expiring or sign a MLE center with the money gained by his expiring contract.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 725
- And1: 6
- Joined: Nov 07, 2007
- Location: bottom 3 city
NO team out of this three way says yes... that's hard to make a trade that bad.. you can improve it sometime maybe right?corwin wrote:Well this deal would leave Memphis with:
PG: Conley/Lowry
SG: Mike Miller/JCN
SF: Gay/Warrick
PF: Ty Thomas/Stromile Smith
C: Dalembert/Darko
I think this team would run & be fun to watch. You'd have at least your own lottery pick to add to the mix.
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
-
- Senior
- Posts: 725
- And1: 6
- Joined: Nov 07, 2007
- Location: bottom 3 city
Cliff Levingston wrote:Another point. Provided the Bulls were willing to do this, Memphis would just cut Philly out and take Noah and Smith themselves. Smith's deal is far from a killer and Noah is younger, faster, much cheaper and probably better than Dalembert.
Younger-Check, but dalembert is young two.
Faster-Maybe, Dalembert is know for running the floor well
Cheaper- Check
Better- NO WAY
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 22,667
- And1: 1,094
- Joined: May 29, 2003
- Location: Cliff Levingston is omnipresent.
roseorbust wrote:Younger-Check, but dalembert is young two.
True, but Noah is much close in line with their remaining cornerstones: Gay and Conley.
roseorbust wrote:Faster-Maybe, Dalembert is know for running the floor well
Yes, he's faster. Noah runs and moves like a small forward, and he can handle the ball like a small forward too which only helps on an uptempo team.
roseorbust wrote:Cheaper- Check
Which is ridiculously important to a rebuilding team, which is exactly what they'd be doing if they traded Gasol.
roseorbust wrote:Better- NO WAY
Not that PER is the end-all of stats, but Noah's PER this season is 18 compared to Sam's 16.7. Maybe Noah isn't better quite yet, but if given actual playing time, he would be by the end of next season at the latest, ICLO.
-
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 5,103
- And1: 13
- Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Cliff Levingston wrote:Another point. Provided the Bulls were willing to do this, Memphis would just cut Philly out and take Noah and Smith themselves. Smith's deal is far from a killer and Noah is younger, faster, much cheaper and probably better than Dalembert.
Your points are all valid. Of course it would be tough to trade both young bigs. However, I don't see how you can get Gasol who makes 13 million unless you either A) include Wallace or one of the BYC players or B) involve a 3rd team & that's what this trade does.
- hermes
- RealGM
- Posts: 93,375
- And1: 24,586
- Joined: Aug 27, 2007
- Location: the restaurant at the end of the universe
Return to Trades and Transactions