Mavrelous wrote:Vassel + Hawks 25/27 1sts + Bulls 1st.
This is insane. How is he more valuable than Vassel?
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Mavrelous wrote:Vassel + Hawks 25/27 1sts + Bulls 1st.
tsherkin wrote:Locked due to absence of adult conversation.
penbeast0 wrote:Guys, if you don't have anything to say, don't post.
E-Balla wrote:LeBron is Jeff George.
G35 wrote:Lebron is not that far off from WB in trade value.
Slim Charless wrote:Slava wrote:Is he even any better than D’Angelo Russell?
Yes. By a wide margin.
Happy to help.
Colbinii wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Vassel + Hawks 25/27 1sts + Bulls 1st.
This is insane. How is he more valuable than Vassel?
Colbinii wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Vassel + Hawks 25/27 1sts + Bulls 1st.
This is insane. How is he more valuable than Vassel?
blicka wrote:Can't wait to see doncic on an island vs jimmy butler,paul george or kahwi leonard and those weak ass moves that work in europe getting shut down
Mavrelous wrote:Colbinii wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Vassel + Hawks 25/27 1sts + Bulls 1st.
This is insane. How is he more valuable than Vassel?
I have the difference between 3rd year Garland and Vassel larger than this, and difference between 4th year Garland and Vassel smaller than this, so this in between value seems fair.
YayBasketball wrote:Ingram + Alvarado (Ingram's BFF and cool with Mitchell) + pick #21
seems like a fair balancing. Fans are also dreaming up a Garland +Allen package for Ingram + Daniels + Nance + multiple picks deal. Maybe a 3rd team involved where WCJ also goes to Cavs (CJ to Magic).
Godaddycurse wrote:Mavrelous wrote:Colbinii wrote:
This is insane. How is he more valuable than Vassel?
I have the difference between 3rd year Garland and Vassel larger than this, and difference between 4th year Garland and Vassel smaller than this, so this in between value seems fair.
You have garland worth.more than young? Pretty sure rhat package is (more than) enough for young
blicka wrote:Can't wait to see doncic on an island vs jimmy butler,paul george or kahwi leonard and those weak ass moves that work in europe getting shut down
Skybox wrote:Kiss of Death wrote:Monky15 wrote:Rockets for FVV, #3 and Eason. Rockets do it for a pgof. Cavs get a bench scorer, big man depth and a pick to use or trade.
Magic for Franz Wagner. Magic do it for a pgof. Cavs do it for frontcourt length and spacing.
Spurs for Pics(s). Spurs do it for a pgof. Cavs do it for more flexible trade assets
Wizards for Deni and Draft capital. Wiz do it to add another young player next to Bilal and pick #2. Cavs do it for wing depth, cap relief and more flexible assets.
I don't know about the other teams but the Rockets deal definitely is not happening.
Add ORL to the “no chance” list. He’s talented but ORL just watched him disappear in a playoff series. Would happily discuss a trade but not for Franz…or Suggs, for that matter. Garland’s deal makes him a questionable value, despite being really good. Maybe he’ll explode out of Mitchell’s overwhelming shadow, but risky at $40m+
Euphonetiks wrote:Funny to see the Cleveland fans downplay Garland’s down season and awful playoffs performance by referencing how good he was 2 years ago vs how they react to Ingram.
There are some wild valuations in this thread. If Ingram agrees to an extension in a trade, I don’t see how he’s worth less than Garland.
Skybox wrote:Euphonetiks wrote:Funny to see the Cleveland fans downplay Garland’s down season and awful playoffs performance by referencing how good he was 2 years ago vs how they react to Ingram.
There are some wild valuations in this thread. If Ingram agrees to an extension in a trade, I don’t see how he’s worth less than Garland.
I'd say that's a fair swap, both will be somewhat overpaid and imperfect but highly talented offensive players.
I'd love Garland for ORL, but his contract is a lot to handle for a young team about to get hit with extensions. Maybe NOLA gives CJ to ORL for a pick and Cole Anthony - to clear salary and make a cozy starting spot for Garland.
I'd still go in for him, but likely have to be a 3-way where ORL's contribution is primarily picks, cap space, maybe Jett or Black and/or Cole Anthony. ORL could absorb his salary this summer but I wouldn't expect cap space and picks to be what CLE craves.
Skybox wrote:NOLA sends: Brandon Ingram, CJ McCollum
NOLA gets: Darius Garland, Wendell Carter
CLE sends: Darius Garland, Jarrett Allen
CLE gets: Brandon Ingram, Jett Howard, Cole Anthony, ORL 26 frp, DEN 25 frp
ORL sends: Wendell Carter, Jett Howard, Cole Anthony, ORL 26 frp, DEN 25 frp, tons of cap space
ORL gets: Jarrett Allen, CJ McCollum
NOLA gets younger and better at two key positions and smoothly inserts Trey/Herb into Ingram's ill-fitted spot next to Zion.
CLE breaks up their two odd couples (presuming a Mitchell re-sign), adds a long-desired scorer at SF, a young shooter, a combo guard sixth-man who can score in bunches, and two frps.
ORL weaponizes it's cap space to facilitate big salaries moving around, gets a better fitting C and an aging but high-scoring leader at PG.
DowJones wrote:Skybox wrote:NOLA sends: Brandon Ingram, CJ McCollum
NOLA gets: Darius Garland, Wendell Carter
CLE sends: Darius Garland, Jarrett Allen
CLE gets: Brandon Ingram, Jett Howard, Cole Anthony, ORL 26 frp, DEN 25 frp
ORL sends: Wendell Carter, Jett Howard, Cole Anthony, ORL 26 frp, DEN 25 frp, tons of cap space
ORL gets: Jarrett Allen, CJ McCollum
NOLA gets younger and better at two key positions and smoothly inserts Trey/Herb into Ingram's ill-fitted spot next to Zion.
CLE breaks up their two odd couples (presuming a Mitchell re-sign), adds a long-desired scorer at SF, a young shooter, a combo guard sixth-man who can score in bunches, and two frps.
ORL weaponizes it's cap space to facilitate big salaries moving around, gets a better fitting C and an aging but high-scoring leader at PG.
There is just no reason for Orlando to be in this deal. Allen is a really good player. You don't trade that for Jett Howard and a pair of low first round picks when you are trying to compete. If the Cavs were looking to blow it up, ok, but they aren't.
eminence wrote:Collins/Clarkson (we could keep Clarkson if they'd prefer) + '27/'29 CLE 1st + '26/'28 CLE swap rights
Lets Cleveland take control of their own picks again. 2 picks + 2 swaps feels like a reasonably competitive offer from what I've seen in here.
daoneandonly wrote:DowJones wrote:Skybox wrote:NOLA sends: Brandon Ingram, CJ McCollum
NOLA gets: Darius Garland, Wendell Carter
CLE sends: Darius Garland, Jarrett Allen
CLE gets: Brandon Ingram, Jett Howard, Cole Anthony, ORL 26 frp, DEN 25 frp
ORL sends: Wendell Carter, Jett Howard, Cole Anthony, ORL 26 frp, DEN 25 frp, tons of cap space
ORL gets: Jarrett Allen, CJ McCollum
NOLA gets younger and better at two key positions and smoothly inserts Trey/Herb into Ingram's ill-fitted spot next to Zion.
CLE breaks up their two odd couples (presuming a Mitchell re-sign), adds a long-desired scorer at SF, a young shooter, a combo guard sixth-man who can score in bunches, and two frps.
ORL weaponizes it's cap space to facilitate big salaries moving around, gets a better fitting C and an aging but high-scoring leader at PG.
There is just no reason for Orlando to be in this deal. Allen is a really good player. You don't trade that for Jett Howard and a pair of low first round picks when you are trying to compete. If the Cavs were looking to blow it up, ok, but they aren't.
Afreed. How in the world can NO dump CJ and get positive value back?
Return to Trades and Transactions