To Cle
Dillon Brooks
Jock Landale
Jae'Sean Tate
Alperen Sengun
2024 #1 Nets (likely 9)
2026 #1 better of Houston or Nets
2027 Nets #1
To Hou
Donovon Mitchell
Jared Allan
Cleveland solves their Mitchell issue and retools around Mobley / Sengun / Garland. Balances their roster a bit, although leaves a hole at PG which would need to be solved via the draft.
Garland /
Levert / Tate
Brooks / Struss
Sengun / Niang
Mobley / Landale
Houston gets their offensive engine, and also balances their roster a bit.
Mitchell / Amen
FVV / Green
Eason / Whitmore
Jabari / Green
Allen / Adams
Hou - Cavs
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,231
- And1: 6,806
- Joined: Feb 22, 2008
Re: Hou - Cavs
Houston certainly has the pieces to make a trade for Mitchell. Maybe some version of this where the Rockets keep Sengun, the Cavs keep Allen, but Green gets put in. I don't think the Cavs would trade Allen in the same deal as Mitchell.
Re: Hou - Cavs
- K_chile22
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,842
- And1: 7,957
- Joined: Jul 15, 2015
Re: Hou - Cavs
I would much much much rather do this instead, don't even get the point of keeping Jalen if you trade for MitchellDowJones wrote:Houston certainly has the pieces to make a trade for Mitchell. Maybe some version of this where the Rockets keep Sengun, the Cavs keep Allen, but Green gets put in. I don't think the Cavs would trade Allen in the same deal as Mitchell.
I'd say Mitchell for Jalen+Cam+Dillon and a bunch of picks. Would love to keep cam but idk how realistic that would be
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,701
- And1: 1,697
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
Re: Hou - Cavs
I'd probably want at least one of Whitmore/Green/Eason rather than Brooks/Tate/Landale+picks if I'm Cleveland and I decide to move two core pieces.
Re: Hou - Cavs
- LarsV8
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,691
- And1: 3,933
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
Re: Hou - Cavs
toooskies wrote:I'd probably want at least one of Whitmore/Green/Eason rather than Brooks/Tate/Landale+picks if I'm Cleveland and I decide to move two core pieces.
Some of that is salary filler, but I would change the Nets picks for Green.
Mitchel
Allan
for
Sengun
Green
Brooks
Tate or Landale
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 367
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Hou - Cavs
Brooks, Amen and the nets picks.
CLE gets big time defense and height across the board.
I would rather keep Brooks but he is exactly what Cleveland needs.
CLE gets big time defense and height across the board.
I would rather keep Brooks but he is exactly what Cleveland needs.
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 367
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Hou - Cavs
Actually, if I were Cleveland, Whitmore and Brooks along with picks. Strong D but whitmore’s scoring would help replace Mitchell.
Re: Hou - Cavs
- LarsV8
- General Manager
- Posts: 8,691
- And1: 3,933
- Joined: Dec 13, 2009
Re: Hou - Cavs
Amen is basically untouchable.
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 4,141
- And1: 367
- Joined: Jun 10, 2005
Re: Hou - Cavs
[quote="LarsV8"]Amen is basically untouchable.[/quote]
A lot of his game is great. I have no faith in his shooting developing. So, I would deal him for the right price.
A lot of his game is great. I have no faith in his shooting developing. So, I would deal him for the right price.
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- Retired Mod
- Posts: 53,992
- And1: 32,477
- Joined: Dec 22, 2010
Re: Hou - Cavs
I'm all the way out on this. It's not fixable. We're downgrading at two positions for no reason.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
Re: Hou - Cavs
-
- Sophomore
- Posts: 119
- And1: 116
- Joined: Oct 25, 2022
Re: Hou - Cavs
This is a very very easy no thanks for me. Sengun plus 3 firsts plus Brooks and 2 other role players for Mitchell and Allen? No way. There is absolutely zero need to make a trade like that for Houston. I feel like this is very same mistake the Cavs made when they traded for Mitchell in the first place.
Return to Trades and Transactions