NO/ATL/BK/SOTA

Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

lordjeff05
Analyst
Posts: 3,005
And1: 770
Joined: Mar 01, 2010

NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#1 » by lordjeff05 » Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:53 pm

Pels give: BI, 2024 first, filler contracts
get: Karl Anthony Towns
ATL gives: Dejounte Murray
gets: BI
BK gives: Cam Johnson
gets: 2024 first, Ej LIddell, Jeremiah Robinson-Earl

Reasons: Pels get a better fit at the 5 and slot Trey Murphy at the 2. Allows them to still play big on the perimeter nd maintain their depth. Atlanta gets a big wing/ second option to pair with Trae in what would hoepfully be a better fit than the current roster. BK gets some draft capital and major cash savings to use for rebuilding this summer and Minnesota gets long term starters at the 1 and the 4 that can pair well with the current team.
User avatar
HornetJail
RealGM
Posts: 44,535
And1: 12,580
Joined: Feb 05, 2012
Location: within Mark Williams' reach
     

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#2 » by HornetJail » Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:56 pm

I'm assuming Minnesota is getting... Murray, Cam Johnson and nothing else?

That saves Minnesota no money and makes them notably worse.
formerly KEMBAtheMETEOR
Wolveswin
Head Coach
Posts: 7,342
And1: 2,544
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#3 » by Wolveswin » Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:00 pm

Towns is worth more than what Pels are giving. Much more considering in conference and overpay tax required for Wolves to trade Towns to in conference foe.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,183
And1: 989
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#4 » by Geaux_Hawks » Thu Apr 18, 2024 10:18 pm

Seems like a deal where Minny gets cut. Is Brooklyn looking to shed money or are they just filler here? I'd be interested in adding BI or Cam depending on what's the logic to moving either one.
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,676
And1: 164
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#5 » by schaffy » Fri Apr 19, 2024 2:05 pm

Geaux_Hawks wrote:Seems like a deal where Minny gets cut. Is Brooklyn looking to shed money or are they just filler here? I'd be interested in adding BI or Cam depending on what's the logic to moving either one.


Minnesota happily accepts your offer to take their ball and go home.
User avatar
Mrakar
Starter
Posts: 2,208
And1: 2,579
Joined: Sep 01, 2010

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#6 » by Mrakar » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:05 pm

If minny decides to trade KAT its because they think he is not worth 50 mils and i would agree with them, which makes his value around 0 or negative. However if Pels give Ingram max that would also make him a zero value guy or negative.

I would rather keep our guy, because at least defense will be decent, with Towns and Zion frontcourt, wuuh, that would be baaaad.
If everything is going well, expect an WojBomb
#Pelslife :cry:
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,676
And1: 164
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#7 » by schaffy » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:12 pm

Mrakar wrote:If minny decides to trade KAT its because they think he is not worth 50 mils and i would agree with them, which makes his value around 0 or negative. However if Pels give Ingram max that would also make him a zero value guy or negative.

I would rather keep our guy, because at least defense will be decent, with Towns and Zion frontcourt, wuuh, that would be baaaad.


I would disagree with your initial premise -- if the Wolves decide to move on from KAT its most likely because of tax reasons (they don't would not want to be a 2nd apron team) and they can get the most value in return from dealing him vs dealing other players/contracts to get below the line.
dms269
Forum Mod - Hawks
Forum Mod - Hawks
Posts: 8,433
And1: 1,532
Joined: Jun 27, 2005
     

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#8 » by dms269 » Fri Apr 19, 2024 4:36 pm

The contract situation of BI is what stops Atlanta from agreeing to it.
The moderator formerly known as uga_dawgs24
JKiddy
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,478
And1: 328
Joined: Jul 28, 2002

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#9 » by JKiddy » Fri Apr 19, 2024 6:47 pm

Are the players BK would be getting in the deal super promising young guns? Were any of them drafted in the lottery?
schaffy
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,676
And1: 164
Joined: Jun 20, 2007
       

Re: NO/ATL/BK/SOTA 

Post#10 » by schaffy » Fri Apr 19, 2024 7:08 pm

JKiddy wrote:Are the players BK would be getting in the deal super promising young guns? Were any of them drafted in the lottery?


They are both 23, so young -- sure. Super promising? Not so much. But they both would have been lottery picks of the 2nd round (if there was one)!

Return to Trades and Transactions