jbk1234 wrote:DowJones wrote:toooskies wrote:Game 1's ORTG (101.2) and game 2's ORTG (104.9) were good enough to win but definitely were not efficient.
Yeah, the offense has really been bad against Orlando. It isn’t like Garland is some maestro running the offense. He mostly dominates the ball with mindless dribbling until there are 10 seconds left on the shot clock. It was refreshing to hear Zach Lowe echo the points I was making when it comes to Garland’s ineffectiveness.
An up and down season filled with injuries really has turned the fanbase toxic.
Where exactly was the up? His stats were down and he has not been good in the playoffs. This was a really down year for Garland and it is ok to admit it. I still have high expectations for him, but he HAS to improve next year. I do really like the way he played in this first half.
