Cavs get: Mikal Bridges, Dennis Schroder
Nets get: Darius Garland
If Mitchell extends, then the Cavs are probably moving Garland and the Nets are in an awful awful awful spot. The Nets need the ability to create offense and the Cavs need role playing wings.
BKN-CLE
Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger
Re: BKN-CLE
-
BK_2020
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,041
- And1: 14,880
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: BKN-CLE
Might as well. Bridges' value is tied to his cheap contract so his value depreciates quickly. But if I'm the Nets I try to send Cam Johnson plus picks instead. Garland isn't gonna turn them into a contender so there's no urgency to trade for him, whereas the Cavs might be feeling some urgency to upgrade.
Re: BKN-CLE
-
HadAnEffectHere
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,908
- And1: 936
- Joined: May 19, 2023
Re: BKN-CLE
BK_2020 wrote:Might as well. Bridges' value is tied to his cheap contract so his value depreciates quickly. But if I'm the Nets I try to send Cam Johnson plus picks instead. Garland isn't gonna turn them into a contender so there's no urgency to trade for him, whereas the Cavs might be feeling some urgency to upgrade.
The urgency is more about avoiding the humiliation of sending out another great pick to the Rockets.
Re: BKN-CLE
-
BK_2020
- RealGM
- Posts: 16,041
- And1: 14,880
- Joined: Sep 08, 2020
-
Re: BKN-CLE
HadAnEffectHere wrote:BK_2020 wrote:Might as well. Bridges' value is tied to his cheap contract so his value depreciates quickly. But if I'm the Nets I try to send Cam Johnson plus picks instead. Garland isn't gonna turn them into a contender so there's no urgency to trade for him, whereas the Cavs might be feeling some urgency to upgrade.
The urgency is more about avoiding the humiliation of sending out another great pick to the Rockets.
What difference does it make to the Nets at this point whether the pick they sent out 3 years ago is great or bad?
Re: BKN-CLE
-
Texas Chuck
- Senior Mod - NBA TnT Forum
- Posts: 86,916
- And1: 90,491
- Joined: May 19, 2012
- Location: Purgatory
-
Re: BKN-CLE
So you want the Nets to make a lateral(at best) trade that really helps Cleveland because of a sunk cost? Yeah sorry but that's a really bad reason to make this trade.
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Re: BKN-CLE
-
Godaddycurse
- RealGM
- Posts: 17,818
- And1: 10,586
- Joined: Nov 13, 2019
-
Re: BKN-CLE
Bridges to cleveland
Garland to houston
Brk picks back to brooklyn?
Garland to houston
Brk picks back to brooklyn?
Re: BKN-CLE
-
brackdan70
- RealGM
- Posts: 13,491
- And1: 8,825
- Joined: Jul 15, 2013
- Location: Ogden, UT
-
Re: BKN-CLE
I think Brooklyn need more value coming back.
If they are going to trade Bridges, I think they can do better.
If they are going to trade Bridges, I think they can do better.
Sign here
Re: BKN-CLE
-
toooskies
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 3,844
- And1: 1,769
- Joined: Jul 18, 2013
-
Re: BKN-CLE
Godaddycurse wrote:Bridges to cleveland
Garland to houston
Brk picks back to brooklyn?
I think Houston would rather trade directly with the Nets. Either that or they need to move FVV.
Return to Trades and Transactions