More Hockey News »


GSW-MIL Trade

Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

Post Reply
User avatar
old rem
RealGM
Posts: 50,753
And1: 1,080
Joined: Jun 14, 2005
Location: Witness Protection

 

Post#21 » by old rem » Sun Jan 6, 2008 1:02 am

BucksRuleAll22 wrote:Yi is not getting traded, especially for nothing.it would take a superstar to get Yi.


Fine....didn't want him and it will take a YOUNG superstar to get Monta! :lol:

(and yeah...we wanna see a birth certificate)
CENSORED... No comment.
Top
AldenOrgain
Freshman
Posts: 74
And1: 0
Joined: Mar 02, 2004

 

Post#22 » by AldenOrgain » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:08 am

So basically both teams like their guy better than the guy they would be getting...

I would like to get Yi to play for GSW, and Monta could get MIL fans a reason to care about basketball.

I guess a deal like this is impossible.
Top
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,266
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#23 » by skones » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:15 am

AldenOrgain wrote:So basically both teams like their guy better than the guy they would be getting...

I would like to get Yi to play for GSW, and Monta could get MIL fans a reason to care about basketball.

I guess a deal like this is impossible.


You're delusional. Monta would NOT make basketball fans in Milwaukee more excited than they are for Yi.
Top
deviljets7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,520
And1: 24
Joined: Feb 16, 2005

 

Post#24 » by deviljets7 » Sun Jan 6, 2008 9:49 am

I think it's fair value wise, but doesn't make sense for either team.

Why would GS trade a young guard who has shown the potential to be a very good scorer for a raw PF when they already have Brandon Wright?

Why would MIL trade a young, developing PF for an undersized SG when they already have Mo Williams and Michael Redd?
enetric wrote:You have the perfect fat% to sit on your butt, eat crap and WATCH someone else do it though. Hell, at that body fat% you might be a starter.
Top
gswhoops
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 32,428
And1: 3,825
Joined: Apr 27, 2005
   

 

Post#25 » by gswhoops » Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:35 pm

deviljets7 wrote:I think it's fair value wise, but doesn't make sense for either team.

Why would GS trade a young guard who has shown the potential to be a very good scorer for a raw PF when they already have Brandon Wright?

Why would MIL trade a young, developing PF for an undersized SG when they already have Mo Williams and Michael Redd?

Deviljets hits the nail on the head. Reasonable value wise, but both teams would rather stick with who they've got.
Top
Ruzious
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 47,909
And1: 11,579
Joined: Jul 17, 2001
       

 

Post#26 » by Ruzious » Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:53 pm

deviljets7 wrote:I think it's fair value wise, but doesn't make sense for either team.

Why would GS trade a young guard who has shown the potential to be a very good scorer for a raw PF when they already have Brandon Wright?

Why would MIL trade a young, developing PF for an undersized SG when they already have Mo Williams and Michael Redd?

Yeah, it makes no sense at all for both teams to duplicate what they already have to create a hole. :noway:
Top
Post Reply

Return to Trades and Transactions