Nothin' Major: NOH-MIL

Moderators: Trader_Joe, loserX, Andre Roberstan, HartfordWhalers, BullyKing, Texas Chuck, MoneyTalks41890, Mamba4Goat, pacers33granger

ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,547
And1: 1,427
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

Nothin' Major: NOH-MIL 

Post#1 » by ecuhus1981 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 9:39 pm

Jackson, Butler and Ely for Gadzuric, Bell and Sessions (Trade ID #4389437)

NOK nabs a couple of quality guards to help Paul. Truthfully, I could see Scott starting Bell over Peterson, but at least he would be a valuable veteran combo guard. Sessions is a tall PG prospect, and Gadzuric is a bad contract, but a good defender inside.
Paul, Peterson, Stojakovic, West, Chandler
Lue, Bell, Wright, Armstrong, Gadzuric



MIL shortens its contractual obligations, while adding a quality (HEALTHY!) SF defender in Butler.
Williams, Redd, Mason, Jianlian, Bogut
Jackson, Simmons, Butler, Villanueva, Ely
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
CBUCK06
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,488
And1: 2
Joined: Jan 30, 2005

Re: Nothin' Major: NOH-MIL 

Post#2 » by CBUCK06 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:08 pm

ecuhus1981 wrote:Jackson, Butler and Ely for Gadzuric, Bell and Sessions (Trade ID #4389437)

NOK nabs a couple of quality guards to help Paul. Truthfully, I could see Scott starting Bell over Peterson, but at least he would be a valuable veteran combo guard. Sessions is a tall PG prospect, and Gadzuric is a bad contract, but a good defender inside.
Paul, Peterson, Stojakovic, West, Chandler
Lue, Bell, Wright, Armstrong, Gadzuric



MIL shortens its contractual obligations, while adding a quality (HEALTHY!) SF defender in Butler.
Williams, Redd, Mason, Jianlian, Bogut
Jackson, Simmons, Butler, Villanueva, Ely


I'd make this move.
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,266
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#3 » by skones » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:11 pm

I'd make this move as well, but would want Sessions taken out for David Noel or a future 2nd round pick if possible. If not, I'd probably still pull the trigger.
ecuhus1981
RealGM
Posts: 16,547
And1: 1,427
Joined: Jun 19, 2007
       

 

Post#4 » by ecuhus1981 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:32 pm

I thought you'd prefer to keep Noel, but I could see him being more valuable to the Hornets' current rotation than Sessions.

Let's see what Hornets fans think.
Some people really have a way with words. Other people... not... have... way.
-- Steve Martin
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,266
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

 

Post#5 » by skones » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:38 pm

Sessions is dominating the D-league. Noel hasn't shown anything valuable thus far.
User avatar
Simulack
RealGM
Posts: 11,300
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 03, 2002

 

Post#6 » by Simulack » Sat Jan 5, 2008 11:39 pm

Sessions is the only thing that might prevent some here from liking this deal. Bucks fans like the guy (doesn't every team think their 2nd round pick in any particular year is the steal of the draft?).

Other than that, looks good for the Bucks.
User avatar
The Big H
Pro Prospect
Posts: 938
And1: 0
Joined: Feb 17, 2005

 

Post#7 » by The Big H » Sun Jan 6, 2008 12:14 am

Hornets aren't taking on those long term deals.

Plus the Hornets don't need Bell and his sub .300 shooting percentage

Return to Trades and Transactions