ImageImage

Bringing It Up Again: A Change In Ownership

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
LUKE23
RealGM
Posts: 72,322
And1: 6,273
Joined: May 26, 2005
Location: Stunville
       

Bringing It Up Again: A Change In Ownership 

Post#1 » by LUKE23 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:07 am

Lets get these questions out of the way, since this is a topic that several know more than I on.

1. How close (in terms of years) realistically is Kohl away from selling this team?

2. Can Kohl put a no-move clause if he sells the team to a non-local owner?

3. What are the chances that the team does move if we do sell to a non-local owner?

4. Which happens first, Kohl sells or we get a new arena deal put in place?


These are all issues at hand. It's such a tough catch 22 situation when you have to weigh likelihood of the team moving (which in terms of being a Bucks fan is basically equal to death) vs. there being no light at the end of the tunnel of this absolute mediocrity.

I'd like to get some input on this situation from people in the know, both to the questions above and also what YOU THINK will end up happening. Where will this team be 5 years from now? 10 years from now?

I'm so frustrated it's amazing.
Epicurus
RealGM
Posts: 15,488
And1: 868
Joined: Jan 25, 2006

 

Post#2 » by Epicurus » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:10 am

I am not a lawyer, but I believe Kohl could put into the sale a covenant that would not allow relocation of the franchise to another city or metro area. However, such a covenant would lower the purchase price enormously, if even a buyer could be found.
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,591
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

 

Post#3 » by Chuck Diesel » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:11 am

Anyone familiar with the world of Milwaukee business tycoons? I know the Johnson and Johnson family is from Wisconsin, but I
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#4 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:33 am

Bucks are rated 29 out of 30 in Franchise Value - and #30 (Portland) is getting more valuable.

Why di you want a new owner?

"The Business of Basketball" from Forbes

http://www.forbes.com/home/business/200..._land.html
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
NeedsMoreCheese
RealGM
Posts: 43,042
And1: 8,369
Joined: Apr 22, 2002
   

 

Post#5 » by NeedsMoreCheese » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:35 am

bulls6 wrote:Bucks are rated 29 out of 30 in Franchise Value - and #30 (Portland) is getting more valuable.

Why di you want a new owner?

"The Business of Basketball" from Forbes

http://www.forbes.com/home/business/200..._land.html


In short, Our current owner is a douche who has no idea what hes doing and wont give any GM the power to build a team.
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,591
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

 

Post#6 » by Chuck Diesel » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:37 am

I
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,591
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

 

Post#7 » by Chuck Diesel » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:38 am

On second thought, that might turn into a Michael Jackson situation way too quickly
User avatar
thakfu
Sophomore
Posts: 185
And1: 73
Joined: Nov 19, 2007
Location: Menasha
Contact:
         

 

Post#8 » by thakfu » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:48 am

does he have a hot daughter??
xTitan
RealGM
Posts: 17,135
And1: 2,283
Joined: Mar 03, 2006
     

 

Post#9 » by xTitan » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:51 am

Chuck Diesel wrote:I
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 93,357
And1: 46,146
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#10 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:10 am

This was discussed a little bit in the game thread.

I appreciate that Kohl has kept the Bucks here but he has played that card for over 20 years now.

He has changed GM's, coaches and players and yet this franchise blows.

Time for a change.
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#11 » by WEFFPIM » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:11 am

Kohl Is A Mome wrote:In short, Our current owner is a douche who has no idea what hes doing and wont give any GM the power to build a team.


Bygones
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
User avatar
MickeyDavis
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 93,357
And1: 46,146
Joined: May 02, 2002
Location: The Craps Table
     

 

Post#12 » by MickeyDavis » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:14 am

Yup, an owner that will hire a BASKETBALL guy and let him make BASKETBALL decisions.

And I wouldn't mind an owner who would at least show a little bit of emotion, good or bad, during a game. I don't want a Cuban who craves TV time but I also don't want a guy who has been dead the last 5 years but you can't tell. and maybe an owner that wears more than one sports coat per season.
User avatar
beyond_the_arc
Starter
Posts: 2,141
And1: 46
Joined: Jul 10, 2005

 

Post#13 » by beyond_the_arc » Sat Jan 5, 2008 4:35 am

MickeyDavis wrote:Yup, an owner that will hire a BASKETBALL guy and let him make BASKETBALL decisions.

And I wouldn't mind an owner who would at least show a little bit of emotion, good or bad, during a game. I don't want a Cuban who craves TV time but I also don't want a guy who has been dead the last 5 years but you can't tell. and maybe an owner that wears more than one sports coat per Decade.


fixed
Postby SubyWill on Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:53 pm

Magic fan checking in, holy **** Harris is legit. Your GM should be fired.


No ****.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,279
And1: 172
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

 

Post#14 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:23 pm

I obviously share the frustration over Kohl, but I don't understand why someone would buy the team if they didn't want to tinker with it. Buying an NBA franchise seems like a very poor financial decision to me, compared to many of the other available investments out there. You have to pay way more than the sum of its future cash flows in order to buy it, which means it's a purely speculative purchase, and the only way you can make money is to find a greater fool some day in the future.

There are some very profitable companies you could buy outright for the same price. Companies with some great business economics that would surely grow your wealth without requiring you to find some other hobbiest to sell to later. If you buy the Bucks, you suffer through negative cash flows - meaning after you buy the team, you have to keep pulling money from your pocket to keep it going. Instead you could buy most of Joseph Bank (currenty $450 million) which would earn you over 10% of your money back the first year. Or you could buy both Cybex International ($77 million), and Jamba Juice ($177 million) and get close to that same initial yield.

Since these options exist, why would you buy an NBA team? The only answer I can think of is because it's a one of a kind toy. It would be fun to put together a team and a coach and see how your vision unfolds. But to hire somebody else to run the thing, and stay out of the way... why would you do that? Why would that be better than owning a very profitable business and staying out of the way?

Edit: I'm reading through Jamba's 10Q, and it's not so profitable after a more in depth look - still doesn't change my point.
User avatar
KeyRabbit
Rookie
Posts: 1,099
And1: 38
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Location: DMV

 

Post#15 » by KeyRabbit » Sat Jan 5, 2008 1:32 pm

MickeyDavis wrote:Yup, an owner that will hire a BASKETBALL guy and let him make BASKETBALL decisions.


Someone like Ernie Grunfeld would be nice. Oh. Wait. :nonono:
________________________________
Candy is Dandy, but Liquor is Quicker
BrewersGM
Banned User
Posts: 601
And1: 0
Joined: Dec 09, 2007

 

Post#16 » by BrewersGM » Sat Jan 5, 2008 2:04 pm

time is running out... he needs to consider it soon. No one will show up at the games if this keeps up...
User avatar
Tommy Udo 6
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 42,507
And1: 28
Joined: Jun 13, 2003
Location: San Francisco/East Bay CA

 

Post#17 » by Tommy Udo 6 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 3:09 pm

Is it possible that he bought the team just to be sure it stayed in Milwaukee? Since he has wealth from other sources, he doesnt need for it to be profitable.

Bulls owner Jerry Reinsdorf knows little about basketball and admits to being a baseball fan first & foremost. However, Reinsdorf gets very involved in every financial move & his chief advisor in that regard is Irwin Mandel, who David Stern says knows more about the salary cap & the CBA than anyone else. (Mandel came up with the unique idea of declining contracts which 4 Bulls have signed - Wallace. Hinrich, Nocioni, Smith) As a result, the Bulls profits are in the stratosphere - even thought the Bulls are mainly composed of likeable roleplayers who have little chance of challenging for a championship.
The gem cannot be polished without friction, nor man perfected without trials.
- -- Chinese proverb
User avatar
WEFFPIM
RealGM
Posts: 38,521
And1: 473
Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Location: WEFFPIM. I'm the real WEFFPIM.
   

 

Post#18 » by WEFFPIM » Sat Jan 5, 2008 5:08 pm

bulls6 wrote:Is it possible that he bought the team just to be sure it stayed in Milwaukee? Since he has wealth from other sources, he doesnt need for it to be profitable.


We know that's one of the main reasons. He's also said he won't sell it to someone who will take the team and bolt. The problem is, how any of those people exist?
ReddWing wrote:Being a fan of this team is tantamount to being in hell...There is no Christ that is coming to save us. Even if there was, we'd trade him for a 28 year old wing.
BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

 

Post#19 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Sat Jan 5, 2008 8:21 pm

Kohl is a bad owner, but I am glade he will not sell the team to anyone that will move them. If Kohl hired a good GM and sat back and let him do everything he would be fine.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks