ImageImage

CV for Thaddeus Young

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

CV for Thaddeus Young 

Post#1 » by Nowak008 » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:02 pm

I never really understood why the 6ers why chose him because he plays the position of their best player. Right now they have Reggie Evans as their starter, and CV could come in be the starter for them. CV IMO is a perfect fit for them. Next to an elite shotblocker and a SF who can defend.

With Young we get a guy with crazy athleticism and tons of upside. From what I recall we were pretty high on him. His draft profile.

Ihttp://www.nbadraft.net/admincp/profil ... young.html

Also we get to dump a lot of mins on Yi, and I'm fine with ruffin being the primary back up PF.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 1,031
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

 

Post#2 » by wichmae » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:06 pm

Philly wouldn't go for it...
RideEmCowboy24
Analyst
Posts: 3,321
And1: 29
Joined: Apr 07, 2005

 

Post#3 » by RideEmCowboy24 » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:15 pm

wichmae's right, philly wouldn't go for it, and good for us, cause thad sucks, and will always suck....the kid just isn't that good and i saw absolutely nothing about him in college or the pros to make me think otherwise
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#4 » by Nowak008 » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:20 pm

RideEmCowboy24 wrote:wichmae's right, philly wouldn't go for it, and good for us, cause thad sucks, and will always suck....the kid just isn't that good and i saw absolutely nothing about him in college or the pros to make me think otherwise


Ouch. I have never seen such a low opinion of him before. He is only 19.

I haven't seen him at all on the 6ers, so I don't know how well he is doing this year. Trading CV for the 12th pick last year sounds about right value wise.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
wichmae
RealGM
Posts: 16,726
And1: 1,031
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: Milwaukee

 

Post#5 » by wichmae » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:22 pm

Thad can play but is a very erratic young player. True value wise it isn't off by much but Philly value's Thad very highly...
User avatar
Nowak008
RealGM
Posts: 14,588
And1: 4,303
Joined: Jul 07, 2006
Location: Book Publisher
Contact:

 

Post#6 » by Nowak008 » Mon Jan 7, 2008 11:28 pm

That could be.

On the other hand they have Reggie frickin Evans as their starting PF.

I guess it also depends how they are on Jason Smith. From what I have seen of him he decent.
Image
John Hammond apologists:
emunney wrote:
Ron Swanson wrote: 9 YEARS!? like any of that matters


THAT LITERALLY IS HIS TENURE.
User avatar
WRau1
RealGM
Posts: 11,925
And1: 5,144
Joined: Apr 30, 2005
Location: Milwaukee
     

 

Post#7 » by WRau1 » Tue Jan 8, 2008 12:43 am

Philly already has a CV-ish PF in Jason Smith.
#FreeChuckDiesel
#FreeNowak008
#FreeNewz
User avatar
Simulack
RealGM
Posts: 11,300
And1: 4
Joined: Jan 03, 2002

 

Post#8 » by Simulack » Tue Jan 8, 2008 2:47 am

I'd do it in a second. I had Young ranked higher than Brewer on my "draft board" and would love to nab him.

However I doubt Philly is interested in trading him for CV. Young is starting to produce now that he has been given some playing time. He's a very good prospect - at the beginning of last season, he was ranked right up there with Durant in terms of potential. That's since been proven to be very unlikely to occur but he it shows how highly people though of him coming out of high school.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

 

Post#9 » by paul » Tue Jan 8, 2008 3:47 am

Unlike most people i wouldn't trade CV at all at the moment. His play after a poor start has noticeably improved in the past month imo and he appears on the way back up, trading now won't return anything like his potential value imo. I actually 'gulp' think he should be starting right now.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks