RealGM

buckboy wrote:

old skool wrote:I think if a player could average 30/6/6/1/2 on .633 TS% shooting, lead the NBA in steals and lead the OKC team we saw yesterday to the number one seed in the West, I would consider that player an MVP candidate.

Candidate? Sure.

He has no business winning it though. Comparing him to Giannis and Joker is ridiculous.

Honestly very confused by this opinion. He's leading a young team to a great record while probably being the most consistent star night to night in the league. Think he should be the no brainer MVP.

blazza18 wrote:

buckboy wrote:

old skool wrote:I think if a player could average 30/6/6/1/2 on .633 TS% shooting, lead the NBA in steals and lead the OKC team we saw yesterday to the number one seed in the West, I would consider that player an MVP candidate.

Candidate? Sure.

He has no business winning it though. Comparing him to Giannis and Joker is ridiculous.

Honestly very confused by this opinion. He's leading a young team to a great record while probably being the most consistent star night to night in the league. Think he should be the no brainer MVP.

And I'm equally confused by yours. With respect.

Putting SGA in the same category as Giannis and Jokic in terms of impact is crazy to me.

And I think SGA is awesome.

Maybe the numbers say something that I don't see when watching.

buckboy wrote:And I'm equally confused by yours. With respect.

Putting SGA in the same category as Giannis and Jokic in terms of impact is crazy to me.

And I think SGA is awesome.

Maybe the numbers say something that I don't see when watching.

My comment with respect too mate.

I believe he was 2nd or 3rd in a ton of the advance stats people loved and I think leading a young team to maybe the one seed should go along way to making a case for him. He's not better than Jokic or Giannis but I just like his case this season more.