ImageImage

Bogut to the Wolves rumor on their board

Moderators: paulpressey25, MickeyDavis

User avatar
Buck You
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 37,556
And1: 541
Joined: Jul 24, 2006
Location: Illinois
     

 

Post#81 » by Buck You » Sat May 24, 2008 4:50 am

bayrdbandit wrote:-= original quote snipped =-



a wanker, technically, is one who pleasures oneself. not a crime in itself.

we use the phrase wanker in the same way you might use something like d*ckhead.

and that concludes vulgarities 101.

Gotcha.
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 18,599
And1: 6,643
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

 

Post#82 » by Profound23 » Sat May 24, 2008 4:52 am

Only way I trade Bogut for the #3 pick, is if I can then trade then #3 and #8 for the #2 pick.
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#83 » by wolves_fan_82au » Sat May 24, 2008 5:20 am

um im a huge Bogut fan but cmon hes not that great
most people are saying Ogilivy is a better prospect and he wasnt even gonna go top 20

even Horford looked better than Bogut and he was taken at 3rd
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#84 » by wolves_fan_82au » Sat May 24, 2008 5:21 am

Profound23 wrote:Only way I trade Bogut for the #3 pick, is if I can then trade then #3 and #8 for the #2 pick.


Beasley will double what bogut did in hes 1st year :banghead:
User avatar
redred9
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,356
And1: 66
Joined: Apr 01, 2008
Location: Sydney & Toronto
     

 

Post#85 » by redred9 » Sat May 24, 2008 5:39 am

LOL at Ogilvy being a better prospect than Bogut. For Europe, maybe!
icat2000
RealGM
Posts: 14,256
And1: 42
Joined: Feb 25, 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia

 

Post#86 » by icat2000 » Sat May 24, 2008 5:49 am

Isn't Lopez meant to be a big fat bust?
BucksRuleAll22
Banned User
Posts: 1,342
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007

 

Post#87 » by BucksRuleAll22 » Sat May 24, 2008 5:56 am

#3 pick is just as good as #8 in my opinon. #3 guy is Mayo on most people boards but I think Eric Gordan is better. Gordan is my guy. More athletic Redd that will be a good defender even at 6-4. Mayo is a shi*y person and horrible character I would never draft a bum like that.
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#88 » by wolves_fan_82au » Sat May 24, 2008 6:01 am

BucksRuleAll22 wrote:#3 pick is just as good as #8 in my opinon. #3 guy is Mayo on most people boards but I think Eric Gordan is better. Gordan is my guy. More athletic Redd that will be a good defender even at 6-4. Mayo is a shi*y person and horrible character I would never draft a bum like that.


wow so you know him or just going of what other people say ?
Ayt
RealGM
Posts: 58,055
And1: 13,794
Joined: Jun 27, 2005

 

Post#89 » by Ayt » Sat May 24, 2008 6:28 am

BucksRuleAll22 wrote:#3 pick is just as good as #8 in my opinon. #3 guy is Mayo on most people boards but I think Eric Gordan is better. Gordan is my guy. More athletic Redd that will be a good defender even at 6-4. Mayo is a shi*y person and horrible character I would never draft a bum like that.


Who is this Gordan character?
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 41,705
And1: 19,791
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

 

Post#90 » by AussieBuck » Sat May 24, 2008 6:49 am

wolves_fan_82au wrote:um im a huge Bogut fan but cmon hes not that great
most people are saying Ogilivy is a better prospect and he wasnt even gonna go top 20

If you ignore rebounding and defense and replace most people with some people your post would be mildly accurate.
TheProdigy
Starter
Posts: 2,366
And1: 1,025
Joined: Feb 21, 2001

 

Post#91 » by TheProdigy » Sat May 24, 2008 7:23 am

wolves_fan_82au wrote:um im a huge Bogut fan but cmon hes not that great
most people are saying Ogilivy is a better prospect and he wasnt even gonna go top 20

even Horford looked better than Bogut and he was taken at 3rd



If you were a huge Bogut fan you wouldn't compare him to Andrew Ogilvy.
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#92 » by wolves_fan_82au » Sat May 24, 2008 8:08 am

AussieBuck wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

If you ignore rebounding and defense and replace most people with some people your post would be mildly accurate.


defense? he only started to get that this year
and hes still not that great at it

and yes some people at the satrt of the year were saying he was gonna be better than Bogut he still might Bogut isnt really improving at the rate i thought he would being a number 1 pick
and i dont think he will with all the ball hogs at the bucks
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#93 » by wolves_fan_82au » Sat May 24, 2008 8:10 am

DaKidKG wrote:-= original quote snipped =-




If you were a huge Bogut fan you wouldn't compare him to Andrew Ogilvy.


why not both centres with good passing skills, also good scorers
Bogut a lil better at rebounding
Chuck Diesel
RealGM
Posts: 17,591
And1: 11,556
Joined: May 23, 2004

 

Post#94 » by Chuck Diesel » Sat May 24, 2008 8:28 am

I'd be interested in exploring a deal involving Randy Foye. Something is going to have to give in Minny with Foye, Jaric, McCants, Brewer, and the third pick ( who will probably be Mayo).
Mags FTW
RealGM
Posts: 34,549
And1: 7,344
Joined: Feb 16, 2006
Location: Flickin' It

 

Post#95 » by Mags FTW » Sat May 24, 2008 8:50 am

I'm amazed that a ballboy no offense thread based on a realgm rumor has had this much life.
DutchManDanFan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,959
And1: 2,807
Joined: May 25, 2005
Location: Voorschoten
 

 

Post#96 » by DutchManDanFan » Sat May 24, 2008 9:37 am

Mags FTW wrote:I'm amazed that a ballboy no offense thread based on a realgm rumor has had this much life.


Indeed. This is for 100% sure not going to happen. Remember what Hammond said about building a team through the draft? Not a chance.
DutchManDanFan
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,959
And1: 2,807
Joined: May 25, 2005
Location: Voorschoten
 

 

Post#97 » by DutchManDanFan » Sat May 24, 2008 9:40 am

It must have been confused with a Bucks foreign center + #8 for #3. There might be a chance the Bucks do that I guess..... :)
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,907
And1: 26,431
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

 

Post#98 » by trwi7 » Sat May 24, 2008 11:08 am

bayrdbandit wrote:a wanker, technically, is one who pleasures oneself. not a crime in itself.


That's disgusting.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
midranger
RealGM
Posts: 38,554
And1: 10,177
Joined: May 12, 2002

 

Post#99 » by midranger » Sat May 24, 2008 12:09 pm

"Most people" are saying Olgilvy is a better prospect? What?

Please define "most people." I've neither seen the reports of him winning national player of the year, nor of him being a consensus top 2 pick. Nor have I seen anyone in the media say anything to this effect.

I challenge you to qualify your bull statement with any evidence.
Please reconsider your animal consumption.
wolves_fan_82au
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 32
Joined: Jan 02, 2005
Location: Melbourne,Australia
Contact:

 

Post#100 » by wolves_fan_82au » Sat May 24, 2008 1:05 pm

midranger wrote:"Most people" are saying Olgilvy is a better prospect? What?

Please define "most people." I've neither seen the reports of him winning national player of the year, nor of him being a consensus top 2 pick. Nor have I seen anyone in the media say anything to this effect.

I challenge you to qualify your bull statement with any evidence.


sorry i ment before college in that tournament that he and ogilvy both played

Return to Milwaukee Bucks