Re: New Signing
Posted: Wed Jul 9, 2008 6:34 pm
APRIL FOOLS!
Sports is our Business
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/
https://forums.realgm.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=823573
emunney wrote:LUKE23 wrote:Birdman would be very uninspiring.
When we agree, we really agree. That said, at least the Birdman can get on the glass and contest some shots. Unlike Haislip. If this is anything other than a vet min deal, though, Color Me Confusedd.
SlideRuleJockey wrote:I think we all may be getting hung up on UFA or RFA. The Thread Title is "New Signing".
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't offer sheets need to be signed, as well as contracts?
I still think it is Craig Smith, based on the evidence presented on this board.
BTW, what has Anderson or 'slip done against the Bucks?
midranger wrote:LOL @ another of these threads. Wichmae, you devil.
bigkurty wrote:midranger wrote:LOL @ another of these threads. Wichmae, you devil.
Haha I know right? So one of these day I think I am just going to start a thread, title it "Blockbuster" and then as my post say something like "we are swapping one of our larger contract players and filler for another big contract player. Think potential superstar."
That thread would go crazy if people believed me. Who would we be trading? Redd, RJ, Mo, Bogut. What would be the filler? Gadz, Des, Bell, Draft picks, etc. Who's the potential superstar? Does potential mean they are not a superstar yet but widely viewed to be one eventually or does it mean they are a superstar so potentially if the trade goes through we have a superstar? And what superstar players or potential superstar players would possibly be on the block? Man that would be a good post. Then I would feed you tidbits of info all day that mean nothing really but add to everyones excitement like when someone says McGrady, I could say, "think Bigger." What does Bigger mean then? Taller, better player, stronger, etc. Man I could get people going for days on this thing I bet. I am warning you all right now. I might pull this move someday.
bigkurty wrote:midranger wrote:LOL @ another of these threads. Wichmae, you devil.
Haha I know right? So one of these day I think I am just going to start a thread, title it "Blockbuster" and then as my post say something like "we are swapping one of our larger contract players and filler for another big contract player. Think potential superstar."
That thread would go crazy if people believed me. Who would we be trading? Redd, RJ, Mo, Bogut. What would be the filler? Gadz, Des, Bell, Draft picks, etc. Who's the potential superstar? Does potential mean they are not a superstar yet but widely viewed to be one eventually or does it mean they are a superstar so potentially if the trade goes through we have a superstar? And what superstar players or potential superstar players would possibly be on the block? Man that would be a good post. Then I would feed you tidbits of info all day that mean nothing really but add to everyones excitement like when someone says McGrady, I could say, "think Bigger." What does Bigger mean then? Taller, better player, stronger, etc. Man I could get people going for days on this thing I bet. I am warning you all right now. I might pull this move someday.
bigkurty wrote:Haha I know right? So one of these day I think I am just going to start a thread, title it "Blockbuster" and then as my post say something like "we are swapping one of our larger contract players and filler for another big contract player. Think potential superstar."
DannoMac20 wrote:bigkurty wrote:midranger wrote:LOL @ another of these threads. Wichmae, you devil.
Haha I know right? So one of these day I think I am just going to start a thread, title it "Blockbuster" and then as my post say something like "we are swapping one of our larger contract players and filler for another big contract player. Think potential superstar."
That thread would go crazy if people believed me. Who would we be trading? Redd, RJ, Mo, Bogut. What would be the filler? Gadz, Des, Bell, Draft picks, etc. Who's the potential superstar? Does potential mean they are not a superstar yet but widely viewed to be one eventually or does it mean they are a superstar so potentially if the trade goes through we have a superstar? And what superstar players or potential superstar players would possibly be on the block? Man that would be a good post. Then I would feed you tidbits of info all day that mean nothing really but add to everyones excitement like when someone says McGrady, I could say, "think Bigger." What does Bigger mean then? Taller, better player, stronger, etc. Man I could get people going for days on this thing I bet. I am warning you all right now. I might pull this move someday.
The solid difference is, Wichmae actually does know what's going on behind the scenes. I don't know about everyone else, but I'm kind of proud we actually have an inside source here. I guess some of you would rather just be left in the complete dark about everything in the organization. To each their own I guess.
DannoMac20 wrote:bigkurty wrote:midranger wrote:LOL @ another of these threads. Wichmae, you devil.
Haha I know right? So one of these day I think I am just going to start a thread, title it "Blockbuster" and then as my post say something like "we are swapping one of our larger contract players and filler for another big contract player. Think potential superstar."
That thread would go crazy if people believed me. Who would we be trading? Redd, RJ, Mo, Bogut. What would be the filler? Gadz, Des, Bell, Draft picks, etc. Who's the potential superstar? Does potential mean they are not a superstar yet but widely viewed to be one eventually or does it mean they are a superstar so potentially if the trade goes through we have a superstar? And what superstar players or potential superstar players would possibly be on the block? Man that would be a good post. Then I would feed you tidbits of info all day that mean nothing really but add to everyones excitement like when someone says McGrady, I could say, "think Bigger." What does Bigger mean then? Taller, better player, stronger, etc. Man I could get people going for days on this thing I bet. I am warning you all right now. I might pull this move someday.
The solid difference is, Wichmae actually does know what's going on behind the scenes. I don't know about everyone else, but I'm kind of proud we actually have an inside source here. I guess some of you would rather just be left in the complete dark about everything in the organization. To each their own I guess.
wichmae wrote:With a little further investigation I feel comfortable posting this:
Its Chris Anderson. He was in town recently on a visit and met with some people. Apparently there was a misunderstanding in my original attempts to find out this. He was not yet offered a contract but still I guess is being discussed. Those of you who actually wanted to know now know.
It I guess was a two year deal being discussed but nothing is imminent. I also know Marcus Haislip is another guy alot of teams are looking at including us. We will see over the next week which way things go with Anderson. I was wrong he has not apparently been offered a contract as of yet. I thought he was last night.