Damon Jones back + WSSP rumor (page 8)

aboveAverage · Post #21 » by **aboveAverage** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:46 pm

I kind of like Damon Jones. At least he'll be a good towel waiver on the bench.

RayRayJones · Post #22 » by **RayRayJones** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:48 pm

bigkurty wrote:Just a side note, I theorized it was something to do with Damon Jones from the beginning although I thought it was him being traded for something most likely. The "insiders" said it had nothing to do with him. Hmmm, now who is the real insider? This whole thread just further proves my beliefs that there are very few insiders I trust. The three most credible IMO are GAD, Formerbucksfan, and Europa. No one else has proven anything to me yet. No offense to anyone who has been posturing as an "insider" but these are just my casual observations.

Your ego is bigger than Mount Everest, my god.

I'm pretty sure GAD was "in" on the insider thing that wichmae was talking about last night. Of course, I could be wrong there.

Who cares who said what? Just because you theorized about something doesn't mean it's anything reputable. Quite obviously wichmae got something from some sort of insider. Insiders aren't correct every single time, but it doesn't mean the information wasn't gotten from an insider source. :roll:

GrandAdmiralDan · Post #23 » by **GrandAdmiralDan** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:48 pm

SugarRay34 wrote:This "present" is like getting a used sweater from Aunt May. Yay

One should never be upset with what they got for Christmas until they have opened up all of their presents first. Maybe Aunt May got you that used sweater because she thought it would help you keep warm on that ski trip that you get from her in the card you haven't opened up yet.

Post #24 » by **paulpressey25** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:48 pm

I like this move. I think we've needed an outside 3-point specialist for awhile now.

DPGBucks · Post #25 » by **DPGBucks** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:49 pm

by aboveAverage on Fri Dec 26, 2008 9:46 pm

I kind of like Damon Jones. At least he'll be a good towel waiver on the bench.

Yes, but what's the point of having four active PGs on the roster?
Luke
Sessions
Lue
DJ

Why?
Does this mean that Bell will be out for a while? I just don't get it.

Well I suppose Jones and Sessions could be used more in a SG role. I guess we'll just see what happens.

LISTEN2JAZZ · Post #26 » by **LISTEN2JAZZ** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:56 pm

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:[More to come...]

bigkurty · Post #27 » by **bigkurty** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 6:59 pm

RayRayJones wrote:
bigkurty wrote:Just a side note, I theorized it was something to do with Damon Jones from the beginning although I thought it was him being traded for something most likely. The "insiders" said it had nothing to do with him. Hmmm, now who is the real insider? This whole thread just further proves my beliefs that there are very few insiders I trust. The three most credible IMO are GAD, Formerbucksfan, and Europa. No one else has proven anything to me yet. No offense to anyone who has been posturing as an "insider" but these are just my casual observations.

Your ego is bigger than Mount Everest, my god.

I'm pretty sure GAD was "in" on the insider thing that wichmae was talking about last night. Of course, I could be wrong there.

Who cares who said what? Just because you theorized about something doesn't mean it's anything reputable. Quite obviously wichmae got something from some sort of insider. Insiders aren't correct every single time, but it doesn't mean the information wasn't gotten from an insider source.

You lost me, where does me pointing out facts give me an ego? A bunch of other people were on the Damon Jones thing too. Logic made it make the most sense. Oh and yeah some insiders are not correct every time I understand but if you want to qualify as an insider in my book, you have to get something right once in awhile.

icat2000 · Post #28 » by **icat2000** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:10 pm

How unexciting this information not even worth breaking ..

Andrew34r · Post #29 » by **Andrew34r** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:23 pm

rilamann wrote:The thing I like about Damon Jones and its the thing I liked about him back in 2004 is that he brings confidence and swagger to the team,great teammate and great locker room guy.

+1

I have been saying this for a long time. Im glad to hear the news...not surprisingly most are not.

blueedwards · Post #30 » by **blueedwards** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:23 pm

Well already own Jones rights. This is pretty much old news. We knew this when we landed Ridnour and Jones. Bogut and his inside info is old news. Unless were trading a pg for a pf. Not sure why Bogut would be happy? Less touches for him, Jones is a shoot first pg. lol

GrandAdmiralDan · Post #31 » by **GrandAdmiralDan** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:29 pm

Is everyone familiar with the expression "can't see the forest for the trees" ?

carmelbrownqueen · Post #32 » by **carmelbrownqueen** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:30 pm

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Is everyone familiar with the expression "can't see the forest for the trees" ?

aaprigs311 · Post #33 » by **aaprigs311** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:36 pm

So through a tale of idioms you're insinuating that there's indeed more to come ?

Mags FTW · Post #34 » by **Mags FTW** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:41 pm

GrandAdmiralDan wrote:Is everyone familiar with the expression "can't see the forest for the trees" ?

I thought this exact phrase in my head when I read icat's post.

You guys need to start connecting the dots.

pilprin · Post #35 » by **pilprin** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:43 pm

So, Someone is getting dealt....hence the need for another guard...or he needs to report so he can get dealt.

Which one is it?

I'll guess the latter.

cam2win · Post #36 » by **cam2win** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:45 pm

Someone tell me I'm not alone with never hearing that expression before....

Mags FTW · Post #37 » by **Mags FTW** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:45 pm

You don't need to report to get dealt.

Mags FTW · Post #38 » by **Mags FTW** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:47 pm

cam2win wrote:Someone tell me I'm not alone with never hearing that expression before....

It means you're not looking at the big picture. Like if you were looking at each individual tree instead of seeing them together as a forest.

cam2win · Post #39 » by **cam2win** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:48 pm

Mags FTW wrote:
cam2win wrote:Someone tell me I'm not alone with never hearing that expression before....

It means you're not looking at the big picture. Like if you were looking at each individual tree instead of seeing them together as a forest.

Thanks for the definition Mags! I figured it had to be something along those lines but wasn't clear.

Captain Erv · Post #40 » by **Captain Erv** » Fri Dec 26, 2008 7:50 pm

wow we're trading Redd and all we're getting is Varejao, Pavlovic, and Hickson??