ImageImage

Lux Tax at $69.9mm. League says prepare for $61mm next year

Moderators: MickeyDavis, paulpressey25

User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,891
And1: 26,407
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#21 » by trwi7 » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:09 am

Just imagine if Hammond would've taken Wally at the deadline. He would have room for Earaslova, Sessions and Childress at the MLE. :D
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 60,271
And1: 36,853
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#22 » by emunney » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:09 am

Alright, as of right now, the following teams are over the threshold:

Boston
Dallas (Can get under by dropping Stack)
Lakers
New Orleans
Knicks
Phoenix
San Antonio
Utah
Washington

...and the following teams can't field a roster without going over, barring other moves.

Cleveland is at $69,280,965 with 10 players under contract.
Denver is at $69,326,776 with 9 players.
Miami is at $69,856,874 with 11.
Orlando is at $68,555,959 with 8.

That's 13/30 teams, for those too lazy to count.

See pg. 4 for Bucks situation
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 61,005
And1: 26,229
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#23 » by paulpressey25 » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:10 am

The question is, who still has the full MLE to blow and might blow it? I think the Knicks will be the biggest challenge as it relates to Ramon. 3-year/MLE offer maybe. But we'll see.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#24 » by europa » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:10 am

Joana wrote:Jennings salary is going to be $2.1mm.

$1.8 millions is the rookie scale salary, but a player's actual salary may vary between 80% and 120% of the rookie scale amount and traditionally teams offer 120%. So, Jennings will make $2.168.520 next season.


I didn't think fam's numbers were wrong but I thought it was puzzling how so many other reports had it at $1.8M. So Jennings gets a little more and Sessions gets a little less. The total should still be about the same.
Nothing will not break me.
Joana
Banned User
Posts: 2,332
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2008

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#25 » by Joana » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:11 am

Is Salim's salary fully guaranteed? If not, which part isn't?

I think the Bucks have around $64 millions committed to salaries next season, including Salim, assuming they sign Jennings and Meeks and that they cut Bruce Bowen.
LISTEN2JAZZ
RealGM
Posts: 13,279
And1: 172
Joined: Feb 21, 2005
Location: Madison
 

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#26 » by LISTEN2JAZZ » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:13 am

Look at the bright side - while we won't be able to field the roster we want, at least we didn't send RJ to Cleveland. That would have churned my stomach!
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#27 » by europa » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:15 am

Joana wrote:Is Salim's salary fully guaranteed? If not, which part isn't?


I believe it's 50% NG'd.

Gardner has a story about the SF position needing to be filled. He talks about Childress and says the Bucks would need to work a S&T with the Hawks to get him. No surprise, but I think we can safely eliminate any concerns if people had them that the Bucks would sign Childress as a FA and lose Sessions and/or Ilyasova. Based on the info Gardner has been spoonfed, I'd say it's very safe to say we know the Bucks' intentions here. They want him but they want it to be a S&T, thus protecting their status under the tax.
Nothing will not break me.
User avatar
carmelbrownqueen
RealGM
Posts: 14,578
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 08, 2004
Location: Somewhere thinking independently

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#28 » by carmelbrownqueen » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:19 am

Teams are still spending money it seems. Raps just extended Bargnani
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan

"We don't accept anything but winning. We don't accept anything but playing hard." - John Hammond
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#29 » by paul » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:20 am

Just a little clarification here Press, feel free to add it to your OP if you like.

Cap - $57.7m
Lux threshold - $69.92m
MLE - $5.854
User avatar
europa
RealGM
Posts: 44,919
And1: 471
Joined: Jun 25, 2005
Location: Right Behind You

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#30 » by europa » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:20 am

carmelbrownqueen wrote:Teams are still spending money it seems. Raps just extended Bargnani


5/$50M. Boguts' contract just keeps looking better and better.
Nothing will not break me.
Joana
Banned User
Posts: 2,332
And1: 1
Joined: Oct 13, 2008

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#31 » by Joana » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:21 am

emunney wrote:Meanwhile, the Bucks currently have $63,213,548 committed to 13 players. Factoring the expected salaries for our draft picks and cutting Bowen, that leaves us at $63,514,656 for 14 players. Assuming that the lux tax is exactly 69.9, we have $6,686,452 under the threshold.


I have slightly different numbers:

Red, Bogut, Gadz, Ridnour, Johnson, Bowen waived, Thomas, Bell, Alexander, Elson, Allen, LRMAM (11 players) = $60.278.667

+ Salim (waived) + Jennings = $62.889.627 (12 players)

+ Meeks = $63.489.627 (13 players)

What am I missing?
aboveAverage
RealGM
Posts: 10,796
And1: 2,611
Joined: Mar 25, 2006
 

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#32 » by aboveAverage » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:22 am

That's a good deal for the Raps actually. Bargnani showed this year that he is legit. I fully expect him to average at least 18/9 over the next couple of seasons.
User avatar
carmelbrownqueen
RealGM
Posts: 14,578
And1: 42
Joined: Jun 08, 2004
Location: Somewhere thinking independently

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#33 » by carmelbrownqueen » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:23 am

europa wrote:
carmelbrownqueen wrote:Teams are still spending money it seems. Raps just extended Bargnani


5/$50M. Boguts' contract just keeps looking better and better.

That was generous.. I wouldn't have given him that miuch money.
"Too many people ask for help, and sometimes you have to help yourself." - Jerry Sloan

"We don't accept anything but winning. We don't accept anything but playing hard." - John Hammond
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#34 » by paul » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:24 am

emunney wrote:Alright, as of right now, the following teams are over the threshold:

Boston
Dallas (Can get under by dropping Stack)
Lakers
New Orleans
Knicks
Phoenix
San Antonio
Utah
Washington

...and the following teams can't field a roster without going over, barring other moves.

Cleveland is at $69,280,965 with 10 players under contract.
Denver is at $69,326,776 with 9 players.
Miami is at $69,856,874 with 11.
Orlando is at $68,555,959 with 8.

That's 13/30 teams, for those too lazy to count.

Meanwhile, the Bucks currently have $63,213,548 committed to 13 players. Factoring the expected salaries for our draft picks and cutting Bowen, that leaves us at $63,514,656 for 14 players. Assuming that the lux tax is exactly 69.9, we have $6,686,452 under the threshold.


Thanks emunney, I think there are going to be several other teams like Atlanta who are going to be pushed hard against it with their FA signings as well.

This shapes up to be one of the most interesting trade and FA periods in a long time, I think we are going to see several teams shedding quality players.
As much as everyone likes to complain about our salary situation we are clearly in MUCH better shape than at least half the league.
User avatar
paul
RealGM
Posts: 32,398
And1: 1,038
Joined: Dec 11, 2007
 

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#35 » by paul » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:25 am

aboveAverage wrote:That's a good deal for the Raps actually. Bargnani showed this year that he is legit. I fully expect him to average at least 18/9 over the next couple of seasons.


9 rebounds? Will they be playing triple overtime every night?

Extremely generous deal from the Raps.
User avatar
emunney
RealGM
Posts: 60,271
And1: 36,853
Joined: Feb 22, 2005
Location: where takes go to be pampered

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#36 » by emunney » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:25 am

Joana wrote:
emunney wrote:Meanwhile, the Bucks currently have $63,213,548 committed to 13 players. Factoring the expected salaries for our draft picks and cutting Bowen, that leaves us at $63,514,656 for 14 players. Assuming that the lux tax is exactly 69.9, we have $6,686,452 under the threshold.


I have slightly different numbers:

Red, Bogut, Gadz, Ridnour, Johnson, Bowen waived, Thomas, Bell, Alexander, Elson, Allen, LRMAM (11 players) = $60.278.667

+ Salim (waived) + Jennings = $62.889.627 (12 players)

+ Meeks = $63.489.627 (13 players)

What am I missing?


2 things: 1 is different and one I missed.

1 is that I don't have us waiving Salim; the 2nd is that I forgot about Amir's trade kicker.
Here are more legal notices regarding the Posts
User avatar
pasting_monkeys
Starter
Posts: 2,090
And1: 1
Joined: Dec 22, 2006
Location: Where women glow and men plunder...

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#37 » by pasting_monkeys » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:26 am

paulpressey25 wrote:The question is, who still has the full MLE to blow and might blow it? I think the Knicks will be the biggest challenge as it relates to Ramon. 3-year/MLE offer maybe. But we'll see.


New York is my biggest concern as well as i don't think Portland are pursuing Sessions as they're looking for a more veteran PG. But even if either of them offer the MLE to Ramon, I'm sure Hammond has plans in place to clear up the necessary space to match it (well i hope he does).
User avatar
paulpressey25
Senior Mod - Bucks
Senior Mod - Bucks
Posts: 61,005
And1: 26,229
Joined: Oct 27, 2002
     

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#38 » by paulpressey25 » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:26 am

5/$50 for Bargs?

Sheer stupidity on Colangelo's part IMO. He's got tools and is an interesting player. But at this point I haven't figured out where the guy plays on a winning team yet, other than a Chris Gatling/Cliff Robinson type role. This was clearly a guy you wait one more year to see what you've got.
In depth discussions here - shorter stuff on Twitter

https://twitter.com/paulpressey25
User avatar
trwi7
RealGM
Posts: 110,891
And1: 26,407
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Location: Aussie bias
         

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#39 » by trwi7 » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:27 am

aboveAverage wrote:That's a good deal for the Raps actually. Bargnani showed this year that he is legit. I fully expect him to average at least 18/9 over the next couple of seasons.


I'll chew off a finger if he averages 9 rebounds a game. I think he might have a better shot at averaging 9 blocks.
stellation wrote:What's the difference between Gery Woelful and this glass of mineral water? The mineral water actually has a source."


I Hate Manure wrote:We look to be awful next season without Beasley.
Debit One
Starter
Posts: 2,363
And1: 87
Joined: Apr 21, 2005
Location: YOU WANNA KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT THIS TEAM?

Re: Luxury Tax at $69.9 million 

Post#40 » by Debit One » Wed Jul 8, 2009 3:29 am

I just looked at the Knicks' salaries. LMAO at the money they are paying this season to some players who will not contribute anything towards a winning team.

Larry Hughes $13.6M
Eddy Curry $10.5M
Al Harrington $10.0M
Cuttino Mobley $9.5M
Darko Milicic $7.5M
Jared Jeffries $6.4M
Chris Duhon $6.0M

That's a whole lot of dead money, boys.

Return to Milwaukee Bucks