ImageImageImage

Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

User avatar
PharmD
Head Coach
Posts: 6,953
And1: 5,536
Joined: Aug 21, 2015
 

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#301 » by PharmD » Tue Feb 14, 2023 1:20 am

Baseline81 wrote:
shangrila wrote:Russell's days were numbered the moment we drafted Ant. There just wasn't going to be a need for another high usage offensive player, especially one that brought little outside of that.

Both you and Klomp are focusing on the Russell aspect of the trade, whereas I'm more concerned with Gobert.

Again, Connelly immediately splashed future assets on an experiment. Fast forward half a season later, we remain in the dark on whether a Towns/Gobert pairing even works. To garner some traction from his initial trade, the POBO then dealt another of the few assets remaining.

It just seems to me Connelly continues to putting all his eggs into his Gobert basket, hoping, at some point, it works out.

I'm not a big Gobert fan but there's no other choice other than trying to make it work with Rudy. There's nothing else to be done on that front.
Calinks
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 48,828
And1: 14,868
Joined: Mar 29, 2006
   

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#302 » by Calinks » Tue Feb 14, 2023 1:22 am

PharmD wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
shangrila wrote:Russell's days were numbered the moment we drafted Ant. There just wasn't going to be a need for another high usage offensive player, especially one that brought little outside of that.

Both you and Klomp are focusing on the Russell aspect of the trade, whereas I'm more concerned with Gobert.

Again, Connelly immediately splashed future assets on an experiment. Fast forward half a season later, we remain in the dark on whether a Towns/Gobert pairing even works. To garner some traction from his initial trade, the POBO then dealt another of the few assets remaining.

It just seems to me Connelly continues to putting all his eggs into his Gobert basket, hoping, at some point, it works out.

I'm not a big Gobert fan but there's no other choice other than trying to make it work with Rudy. There's nothing else to be done on that front.

Yep the front office made this choice extremely confident that it can work. Now they have to give it every chance, its over, this is the path we are on.
When luck shuts the door skill comes in through the window.
Nick K
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,237
And1: 2,109
Joined: Nov 23, 2016
       

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#303 » by Nick K » Tue Feb 14, 2023 1:34 am

shangrila wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
shangrila wrote:Russell's days were numbered the moment we drafted Ant. There just wasn't going to be a need for another high usage offensive player, especially one that brought little outside of that.

Both you and Klomp are focusing on the Russell aspect of the trade, whereas I'm more concerned with Gobert.

Again, Connelly immediately splashed future assets on an experiment. Fast forward half a season later, we remain in the dark on whether a Towns/Gobert pairing even works. To garner some traction from his initial trade, the POBO then dealt another of the few assets remaining.

It just seems to me Connelly continues to putting all his eggs into his Gobert basket, hoping, at some point, it works out.

I mean, it's not like they passed up a better player just to get someone that works with Gobert. Russell was getting moved at this point regardless as they clearly didn't want to pay him what he was willing to agree to. And given there have been rumours for years now of them trying to move him without any traction it seems fair to assume that Russell's value wasn't very high.

Does Conley work better with Gobert? Absolutely. Does he also work better with KAT and Ant? Arguably yes, as a low turnover/game managing PG.

I honestly don't see what the problem is with this deal. Even if Rudy weren't on the team I'd probably still have made it.


The reason why you don't see a problem with the deal is that there isn't a problem. We're a better team because of it.

Dlo had a good game every 3rd or 4th game. People have short memories of him missing shot after shot.
younggunsmn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,487
And1: 1,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#304 » by younggunsmn » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:12 am

Colbinii wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:My 2 cents for the GOAT debate, you have to judge the player by the era they played in just like you have to judge historical figures by the times they lived in. Context matters.

Jordan played in one of the toughest eras, where defenders could get away with almost anything and you had maybe one 3 point specialist on your team instead of a team full of shooters.
Every basket in that era was a tough basket.
You couldn't be built like a linebacker and just truck your way to 20 free throw attempts like today.
Nearly every team had 2 BAMFs waiting for you in the lane like Charles Oakley or Antonio/Dale Davis.
I would like to see how Lebron handled the bad boy pistons of the 80s with as mentally soft as he can be at times.

I don't think there will ever be a player with the will to win quite like Jordan.
I remember staying up late to watch those Portland and Laker finals games and the intensity of those games is something you don't see anymore. Jordan was clearly one a pedestal way above every other player, even guys like Drexler and Magic.
I remember everybody loved the Lakers in those days and Jordan was like the guy who went from villain to babyface in wrestling because he won the entire sporting world over with his incredible play and charisma.
Lebron never was the singular face of an entire sport the way Jordan was for 10 years.

Lebron will have better stats over time, but I also think he's maybe the 2nd most physically gifted player ever behind Wilt Chamberlain.
The one title he deserves credit for is the one he won for Cleveland against a loaded Warrior team, because I think he willed that team to victory. The heat wins and Laker bubble win were not impressive because of the superteam aspect and covid season.

The guys who played in the 60s-70s have a better argument for stats/titles/accolades. Havlicek/Russell and the Celtics, Wilt, Kareem, even Mikan. But they also played with fewer teams and no 3 point line.

Going back to the era argument, it's kind of like arguing what is the best era of music. Each had their charm and each successive one had technological advantages the previous didn't.
Was Zeppelin better because they had to record to tape and 70's era is superior?
Was it much harder for Jordan in the hair metal era than for Lebron in the autotune/boyband era where almost everything is a foul?

My answer is yes. And players are going to keep getting softer and softer because that's what society reflects back at them.
Could you imagine Isaiah Thomas and Jordan having a passive aggressive slap fight over instagram the way some of these soft babies do today? I didn't get my contract extension so I'm going to unfollow my team and highest paid teammate on instagram.
That dude is ten-ply.


This reads like a satire, I really hope it is.

I am guessing you loved "He Gets Us" commercial at the Super Bowl justifying Fascism.


I feel bad for you that you felt the need to post this, it had absolutely nothing to do with basketball
I would report you and put you on ignore if I did that sort of thing (you know, digital fascism), which I have yet to do in 15+ years here.

I didn't watch the super bowl ad, but religious/political advertising in general makes me cringe, whatever side it comes from.
Every one of those "He Gets Us" ads I've seen has pushed compassion and understanding for immigrant and LGBTQ issues.
They are in reality thinly disguised political ads, and not from the side of the aisle you appear to think they are coming from.
But believe what you want to believe.
younggunsmn
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,487
And1: 1,566
Joined: May 28, 2007
Location: Hiding from the thought police.

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#305 » by younggunsmn » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:27 am

Worm Guts wrote: I can’t get over the fact that Lebron hand-picked a superstar team and then lost twice in the finals. It just feels like there’s no way Jordan loses to the Mavericks (especially) and the Spurs.


I totally agree, and this is a better way of putting it than I could muster.
And he would have lost a 3rd time if this Spurs could have grabbed just 1 more rebound in game 6.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#306 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:38 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:Oakley was amazing. He had great shooters on the wings. Those Bulls teams were stacked top to bottom.

And this is why posters don't take you seriously.

Oakley played for the Bulls 1985-86, 1986-87 and 1987-88 seasons. He then played once more 2001-02 season. How did he help Jordan with a title(s)?

https://www.basketball-reference.com/players/o/oaklech01.html

I thought Oakley played with Jordan. Are you saying he didn't. Excuse me if I got that wrong.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#307 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:46 pm

younggunsmn wrote:
Worm Guts wrote: I can’t get over the fact that Lebron hand-picked a superstar team and then lost twice in the finals. It just feels like there’s no way Jordan loses to the Mavericks (especially) and the Spurs.


I totally agree, and this is a better way of putting it than I could muster.
And he would have lost a 3rd time if this Spurs could have grabbed just 1 more rebound in game 6.

Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,184
And1: 10,616
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#308 » by Worm Guts » Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:57 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
Worm Guts wrote: I can’t get over the fact that Lebron hand-picked a superstar team and then lost twice in the finals. It just feels like there’s no way Jordan loses to the Mavericks (especially) and the Spurs.


I totally agree, and this is a better way of putting it than I could muster.
And he would have lost a 3rd time if this Spurs could have grabbed just 1 more rebound in game 6.

Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.


It's not that he ever lost, it's the context. I don't blame him for losing in Cleveland.
Baseline81
Starter
Posts: 2,445
And1: 1,459
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#309 » by Baseline81 » Tue Feb 14, 2023 3:58 pm

KGdaBom wrote:I thought Oakley played with Jordan. Are you saying he didn't. Excuse me if I got that wrong.

Early on, Oakley did play with Jordan, however, he was traded to New York for Cartwright. I am dumbfounded why you would bring a player into the conversation that wasn't a member of the six championship teams.
Baseline81
Starter
Posts: 2,445
And1: 1,459
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#310 » by Baseline81 » Tue Feb 14, 2023 4:00 pm

KGdaBom wrote:Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.

In American sports, when has losing the championship ever been celebrated?
fattymcgee
Senior
Posts: 518
And1: 274
Joined: Apr 03, 2008

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#311 » by fattymcgee » Tue Feb 14, 2023 4:57 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.

In American sports, when has losing the championship ever been celebrated?


Although that is true, I personally think it's stupid. Being #2 of the top 30 teams in the world is an accomplishment.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#312 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:04 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
I totally agree, and this is a better way of putting it than I could muster.
And he would have lost a 3rd time if this Spurs could have grabbed just 1 more rebound in game 6.

Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.


It's not that he ever lost, it's the context. I don't blame him for losing in Cleveland.

I will never consider a player losing in the NBA finals a negative on his resume. No way in hell. If that is a negative how much worse is losing in the first round.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#313 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:06 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:I thought Oakley played with Jordan. Are you saying he didn't. Excuse me if I got that wrong.

Early on, Oakley did play with Jordan, however, he was traded to New York for Cartwright. I am dumbfounded why you would bring a player into the conversation that wasn't a member of the six championship teams.

It was like a hundred years ago. I thought they did play together for several years. I guess I was wrong about Oakley being on some of the championship teams. The horror of my not recalling that exactly right.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#314 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:08 pm

Baseline81 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.

In American sports, when has losing the championship ever been celebrated?

I was very happy with the Vikings making the Super Bowl. I wasn't happy with the Super Bowl result. But it was a lot better than not making the playoffs or losing in the first round of the playoffs. Jordan did that 3 years in a row. LeBron won the first round 14 times in a row.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#315 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:10 pm

fattymcgee wrote:
Baseline81 wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.

In American sports, when has losing the championship ever been celebrated?


Although that is true, I personally think it's stupid. Being #2 of the top 30 teams in the world is an accomplishment.

Total agreement. Losing the final isn't what should be celebrated. It's making it to the finals that should be. It's goofy how people don't count Jordan losing in the first round as a negative against him, but they count LeBron losing in the finals as a negative against him.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,184
And1: 10,616
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#316 » by Worm Guts » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:13 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.


It's not that he ever lost, it's the context. I don't blame him for losing in Cleveland.

I will never consider a player losing in the NBA finals a negative on his resume. No way in hell. If that is a negative how much worse is losing in the first round.


You’re not in your prime your whole career. James didn’t even make the playoffs last year. James was in his prime on the Heat and came up short. It’s not really even a criticism other than not being as good as Jordan.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#317 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:15 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
It's not that he ever lost, it's the context. I don't blame him for losing in Cleveland.

I will never consider a player losing in the NBA finals a negative on his resume. No way in hell. If that is a negative how much worse is losing in the first round.


You’re not in your prime your whole career. James was in his prime on the Heat and came up short. It’s not really a criticism other than not being as good as Jordan.

Jordan lost in the first round 3 years in a row. LeBron won the first round 14 times in a row before finally losing in one. I say advantage LeBron.
What is your argument for Jordan. That at his best he was better than LeBron at his best? Than we have to look at Shaq and Wilt and every other player in their very best year and use that as the criterion for the GOAT? No the GOAT is over the entirety of the career.
Worm Guts
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 26,184
And1: 10,616
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
     

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#318 » by Worm Guts » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:17 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:I will never consider a player losing in the NBA finals a negative on his resume. No way in hell. If that is a negative how much worse is losing in the first round.


You’re not in your prime your whole career. James was in his prime on the Heat and came up short. It’s not really a criticism other than not being as good as Jordan.

Jordan lost in the first round 3 years in a row. LeBron won the first round 14 times in a row before finally losing in one. I say advantage LeBron.

6 rings to 4 is the number that matters.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,836
And1: 5,036
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#319 » by KGdaBom » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:18 pm

Worm Guts wrote:
KGdaBom wrote:
Worm Guts wrote:
You’re not in your prime your whole career. James was in his prime on the Heat and came up short. It’s not really a criticism other than not being as good as Jordan.

Jordan lost in the first round 3 years in a row. LeBron won the first round 14 times in a row before finally losing in one. I say advantage LeBron.

6 rings to 4 is the number that matters.

No it isn't. If that were the case Russell is the GOAT and there is no conversation.
6 Titles is great and so is 4 just not quite as great. Both players have enough titles to not be eliminated from GOAT conversation by that factor. Consistency and total numbers strongly favor King James.
Ethomasp31
Senior
Posts: 661
And1: 212
Joined: Jul 11, 2014
       

Re: Woj/Shams/Jon: The Russell deal is done 

Post#320 » by Ethomasp31 » Tue Feb 14, 2023 5:37 pm

KGdaBom wrote:
younggunsmn wrote:
Worm Guts wrote: I can’t get over the fact that Lebron hand-picked a superstar team and then lost twice in the finals. It just feels like there’s no way Jordan loses to the Mavericks (especially) and the Spurs.


I totally agree, and this is a better way of putting it than I could muster.
And he would have lost a 3rd time if this Spurs could have grabbed just 1 more rebound in game 6.

Making the finals 8 straight years and not winning every one. What a loser.............. :banghead: :crazy: :noway:
Yes Jordan won every finals he made. He also lost in the first round 3 consecutive years after sneaking in with a losing record. That's a wash or IMO favors LeBron. LeBron won in the first round 14 times out of 14 tries. Consistency.



I wasn't going to comment on this again but good grief...how is this even a debate?

A couple of corrections...LeBron missed the playoffs in his first two seasons...he also missed the playoffs in 2019, 2022 and most likely will miss them again this year. He also lost in the first round in 2021.

Yes, Jordan lost in the first round of the playoffs his first three seasons in the NBA...twice to the Boston Celtics (the 1986 team was considered one of the greatest teams of all time and the other Celtic team lost to the Lakers) and once to a loaded Milwaukee Bucks team. One of those years he broke his foot at the beginning of the season and came back around game 70. But that year in the playoffs he scored 49 and 63 points in games one and two against the '86 Celtics. By the way, in his other 11 seasons with the Bulls he missed a total of 7 games!! James has played 82 games once in his career. Jordan was never dethroned...but walked away twice. His 6 straight championships would have probably been 9 or 10 in a row had he not retired after his two three-peats. In his last 10 seasons with the Bulls, he led the NBA in scoring every season (LeBron led the NBA in scoring once in his career) and his last 9 seasons with the Bulls he was NBA all defensive first team.

James is awesome basketball player. One of the greatest of all time. He is in the discussion to be the second best player in NBA history with about 5-8 other players...but there is one GOAT and that is Michael Jordan.

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves