mplsfonz23 wrote:Klomp wrote:mplsfonz23 wrote:Isn't Kyle more of a SF? Small ball PF? 6-9 230 doesn't seem like he can compete with a true PF. Or is the word "true" not used anymore? Positionless basketball? If Towns can't keep up with quicker PF's how is Slow Mo going to?
I'm a little confused. You start out asking if Anderson is more of a SF, but then you ask how he will be able to keep up with quicker PFs.
He's not an 80s PF, but he's absolutely good enough to be a 20s PF.
Sorry for the confusion. I don't really know much about him. But I went off of his nick name and size and thought he was going to be a G/F type combo. But you and Winforlose helped me understand what type of player we have. Plus that was a nice encouraging video posted.
What is a "True" PF?
Here are the PF's on some contenders last year [Using Bbref Measurements]:
Jae Crowder 6' 6" 235
Cam Johnson 6' 8" 210
Tatum 6' 8" 210
Grant Williams 6' 6" 236
Al Horford 6'9 240P.J. Tucker 6' 5" 245
Jimmy Butler 6' 7" 230
Maxi Kleber 6' 10" 240
Davis Bertans 6' 10" 225
Al Horford is the only guy who fits the old school mold of a PF/C type. The NBA has shifted significantly and even using the terms "PF" or "SF" or "PG" is essentially meaningless outside of discussing generally meaningless awards. Moving beyond positions and instead assessing players based on their skill-sets has significantly more value and makes signifciantly more sense when evaluating a player.
Kyle "Slow-Mo" Anderson has some pros and cons. His Pros include his passing and ball-handling for his position, his general feel and IQ for the game and his length [Extremely long arms] on the defensive end. In theory, Anderson is a terrific fit at the 4 with Towns at the 5. Anderson's fit next to Gobert and additional ball-handlers is less than ideal but defensively would wreck havoc.
Here are some line-up examples where Slow-Mo would benefit:
Forbes/Nowell
Edwards
Prince/McDaniels
Slow-Mo
Towns/Reid
Slow-Mo helps line-ups without a "True PG" with his ball-handling. Another benefit of this [Which I assume we will get to eventually] is the fact Towns has
historically struggled against smaller "bigs" [Batum, Clarke, Slow-Mo, ect]. A Slow-Mo/Towns pick and roll actually counters this because if the defense DOESN'T SWITCH and keeps the smaller big on Towns, then Towns can pop for a wide open 3. If they do switch, Towns gets to drive against a slower-plodding Center, which he loves to do.