ImageImageImage

**The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two**

Moderators: Domejandro, Worm Guts, Calinks

shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,000
And1: 6,080
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#61 » by shangrila » Thu Jun 16, 2022 10:57 pm

fattymcgee wrote:
shangrila wrote:
jscott wrote:That’s not an opinion bro. It’s backed up by stats…

I read it as just best "shooting" big man, which is debatable. Best 3pt shooter specifically...yeah, ok, sure. I can't really be bothered to go through history to see if there was anyone better so I'll give you all that.

Still doesn't make him worth the supermax or an all time great. But hey, you guys won the technicality. Congratulations.

Do you not understand facts?

:lol:


Why do you keep bringing up "all time great"? I don't get it. What does that have to do with the super max? There are plenty of players eligible for the supermax that aren't all time greats.

Is it really that hard of a concept for people to grasp?

The only players worth a supermax are in those in that Curry, Lebron, Giannis, etc tier. Future all time greats, basically. Towns isn't one of them. I know he's eligible but being eligible doesn't mean he's worth that kind of money. Or does anyone want to argue DLo is worth a max because he can technically sign one?
jscott
Veteran
Posts: 2,692
And1: 932
Joined: Oct 14, 2004
 

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#62 » by jscott » Fri Jun 17, 2022 12:21 am

shangrila wrote:
fattymcgee wrote:
shangrila wrote:I read it as just best "shooting" big man, which is debatable. Best 3pt shooter specifically...yeah, ok, sure. I can't really be bothered to go through history to see if there was anyone better so I'll give you all that.

Still doesn't make him worth the supermax or an all time great. But hey, you guys won the technicality. Congratulations.


:lol:


Why do you keep bringing up "all time great"? I don't get it. What does that have to do with the super max? There are plenty of players eligible for the supermax that aren't all time greats.

Is it really that hard of a concept for people to grasp?

The only players worth a supermax are in those in that Curry, Lebron, Giannis, etc tier. Future all time greats, basically. Towns isn't one of them. I know he's eligible but being eligible doesn't mean he's worth that kind of money. Or does anyone want to argue DLo is worth a max because he can technically sign one?

Your arguments have nothing to do with each other. You also don’t understand economics.
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,000
And1: 6,080
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#63 » by shangrila » Fri Jun 17, 2022 1:56 am

jscott wrote:
shangrila wrote:
fattymcgee wrote:
Why do you keep bringing up "all time great"? I don't get it. What does that have to do with the super max? There are plenty of players eligible for the supermax that aren't all time greats.

Is it really that hard of a concept for people to grasp?

The only players worth a supermax are in those in that Curry, Lebron, Giannis, etc tier. Future all time greats, basically. Towns isn't one of them. I know he's eligible but being eligible doesn't mean he's worth that kind of money. Or does anyone want to argue DLo is worth a max because he can technically sign one?

Your arguments have nothing to do with each other. You also don’t understand economics.

:lol:

Yeah, I'm done with this.
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,610
And1: 15,142
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#64 » by shrink » Mon Jun 20, 2022 8:18 pm

Karl Anthony-Towns was the only player this season to shoot 55% or better on at least 400 2-point attempts and 40% or better on at least 100 3-point attempts.
old school 34
Senior
Posts: 645
And1: 240
Joined: Jun 14, 2018
         

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#65 » by old school 34 » Tue Jun 21, 2022 3:20 am

shangrila wrote:
jscott wrote:
shangrila wrote:Is it really that hard of a concept for people to grasp?

The only players worth a supermax are in those in that Curry, Lebron, Giannis, etc tier. Future all time greats, basically. Towns isn't one of them. I know he's eligible but being eligible doesn't mean he's worth that kind of money. Or does anyone want to argue DLo is worth a max because he can technically sign one?

Your arguments have nothing to do with each other. You also don’t understand economics.



Yeah, I'm done with this.
Hey, little late to the party....but Shangrila, I believe I get your argument as that's best practice on only giving that tier the super-max....which sure from a theory standpoint makes a ton of sense. But that's not current marketplace right & if I'm going to have a championship caliber roster....don't I have to play ball? In the fast food industry, difficult to make a profit paying employees $20/hr right now, but if I don't the alternative is joint is open less making less revenue because I lack staff to run it? Now, KAT still needs to still be in next tier to be worth the overpay, whereas one could argue DLo is too many tiers (not sure if that's exactly the right way to explain it?)...but that would be the counter right on why yes for KAT & no for DLo...no?

I mean, I get getting squishy on the end of the KAT deal, but we can move him if needed after that fact? If you want to deal him now...then for who do you have in mind?

Or if you low ball him....aren't you going against everything Arod & Lore are trying to say is different now with the organization...that we're 1st class & no longer cheap? Even if your trying to do it for basketball reasons...that's how it will be perceived? Or maybe you can thread some crazy line...where you extend KAT for less than supermax...in exchange to keep DLo & extend him at some absurd #? Which okay...you may be closer on KAT, but now stuck on a overpay on DLo?

I think I understand the principle your trying to stand on, just don't think because of us being a smaller market that also lacks a fair amount of credibility...it just isn't a reality at this time.

Sent from my SM-G973U using RealGM mobile app
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,807
And1: 18,239
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#66 » by Klomp » Tue Jun 21, 2022 7:47 pm

shrink wrote:A little thought experiment.

Two teams each have four players they paid $20 mil for, and together they give each team $80 mil in production.

Team A buys a fifth player for $20 mil that provides $20 mil in production .. they produce 100 units each game
Team B buys a fifth player for $40 mil that provides $30 mil in production .. they produce 110 units, and beat Team A.

My point is that the winning team isn’t the one with the best contracts. The winning team is the one that can get the most production for their overall money, vs their opponents. Wins come from production.

Max deals are scary, but they allow a team to consolidate a lot of production into a single player on the floor. If Team A spends its $40 mil on two $20 mil players, Team B still wins, because Team A can’t play six men. Giannis, Jokic etc are worth super-max deals .. probably more. They need to be supported by cost-effective production from other positions. KAT does not need to produce $45 mil in production to be worth a $45 mil contract, but he better be closer to Giannis and not John Wall for that money to lead to wins for the Wolves.

I want to go back and look this. Building a team isn't just about collecting the most talent, but how that talent fits together. I mean you can take one of those "Build a team for $15" social media posts and run out a lineup of Westbrook / Wade / Leonard / Gasol / Shaq. Very talented, but could they win? Defense could probably just pack the paint all day against them because you're not looking at roster dynamics.

Similarly, you can put players together and the sum could end up better than what they were individually. The early 2000s Pistons are a great example of this. Ben Wallace's impact was greater once he was paired with Rasheed Wallace while individually he might not have been as good as other centers of the era.

This is the same in the modern era. Antetokounmpo and Middleton = good pairing. James and Westbrook = not good pairing.

This is what I'm seeing at the top of our roster. Towns isn't the best center in the league. Edwards isn't the best shooting guard in the league. But together, I'd argue the value together is better than what they are individually (especially Towns). They both understand that they need each other to maximize their own games and as a result the team's success. Are they the perfect pairing? Of course not, and that's why there are 15 roster spots in the NBA and not just 2.

Read on Twitter
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
shrink
RealGM
Posts: 55,610
And1: 15,142
Joined: Sep 26, 2005

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#67 » by shrink » Thu Jun 23, 2022 6:41 am

Amid rumors that Minnesota is exploring the trade market for veteran centers, including Clint Capela, Michael Rand of The Star Tribune wonders if one of the team’s biggest offseason moves might be a position change for Towns. Rand notes that sliding Towns down to the power forward spot would improve the Wolves’ rebounding woes, and he’d likely feast on smaller players in the post, but there are some possible drawbacks. Towns is quicker than most centers, so he might lose the ability to pump-fake and drive past slower-footed defenders, and it would take him time to adjust defensively. Ultimately, Rand believes utilizing a bigger lineup could work in certain matchups.

So, a bigger lineup “COULD work in CERTAIN MATCHUPS?”

Way to go out on a limb there, Rando.
wolves_89
Head Coach
Posts: 7,382
And1: 4,041
Joined: Jul 10, 2012
 

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#68 » by wolves_89 » Thu Jun 23, 2022 1:35 pm

shrink wrote:
Amid rumors that Minnesota is exploring the trade market for veteran centers, including Clint Capela, Michael Rand of The Star Tribune wonders if one of the team’s biggest offseason moves might be a position change for Towns. Rand notes that sliding Towns down to the power forward spot would improve the Wolves’ rebounding woes, and he’d likely feast on smaller players in the post, but there are some possible drawbacks. Towns is quicker than most centers, so he might lose the ability to pump-fake and drive past slower-footed defenders, and it would take him time to adjust defensively. Ultimately, Rand believes utilizing a bigger lineup could work in certain matchups.

So, a bigger lineup “COULD work in CERTAIN MATCHUPS?”

Way to go out on a limb there, Rando.


I don't think Towns playing next to a bigger center will have any effect on his driving abilities. Towns is already guarded by the opposing PF the vast majority of the time.
User avatar
Domejandro
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Forum Mod - Timberwolves
Posts: 18,747
And1: 27,565
Joined: Jul 29, 2014
Location: San Diego, California

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#69 » by Domejandro » Thu Jun 23, 2022 3:23 pm

You can tell when a local reporter doesn't watch your favourite team so quickly....

Teams already hid immobile defensive players on Jarred Vanderbilt. We already know what that looks like. :lol:
User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#70 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Thu Jun 23, 2022 5:33 pm

What’s the list of 4s outside of Giannis that towns would struggle to defend? Maybe lebron? Durant? They aren’t true power forwards. Hell there really isn’t true 1-5s any more like 30 years ago
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,807
And1: 18,239
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#71 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 30, 2022 5:37 pm

Left-field thought:

A lot of us have questioned if we can afford to lose the shooting gravity of Malik Beasley, but I wonder if a possible solution is to use Towns more on the perimeter, and that's fueling the idea of adding a big man. It will keep him out of foul trouble because not only is he not banging against the top posts on the opponent on defense but also spending less time in the post on offense will eliminate a lot of charges for hooking and bullying in the post.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
winforlose
General Manager
Posts: 8,832
And1: 3,653
Joined: Feb 27, 2020

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#72 » by winforlose » Thu Jun 30, 2022 5:39 pm

Klomp wrote:Left-field thought:

A lot of us have questioned if we can afford to lose the shooting gravity of Malik Beasley, but I wonder if a possible solution is to use Towns more on the perimeter, and that's fueling the idea of adding a big man. It will keep him out of foul trouble because not only is he not banging against the top posts on the opponent on defense but also spending less time in the post on offense will eliminate a lot of charges for hooking and bullying in the post.


Not left field, center field, dead center. In other words, RIGHT ON.
Baseline81
Starter
Posts: 2,402
And1: 1,341
Joined: Jan 18, 2009

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#73 » by Baseline81 » Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:36 pm

Is Towns hinting at the supermax?
Read on Twitter
Klomp
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 63,807
And1: 18,239
Joined: Jul 08, 2005
Contact:
   

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#74 » by Klomp » Thu Jun 30, 2022 8:47 pm

Baseline81 wrote:Is Towns hinting at the supermax?
Read on Twitter

Clearly. He knows he is about to get a bag.
tsherkin wrote:The important thing to take away here is that Klomp is wrong.
Esohny wrote:Why are you asking Klomp? "He's" actually a bot that posts random blurbs from a database.

Klomp wrote:I'm putting the tired in retired mod at the moment
User avatar
D1SGRUNTL3D
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,104
And1: 2,080
Joined: Jan 23, 2006
Location: Minnesota
   

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#75 » by D1SGRUNTL3D » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:12 am

Woj just tweeted KAT got that bag.

Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=vHssBJofZ9cNo1noWZnSTA

Well he’s here for his prime.
User avatar
King Malta
Starter
Posts: 2,324
And1: 1,547
Joined: Jun 24, 2013
Location: The Lottery
         

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#76 » by King Malta » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:22 am

Pleased.

It's a lot of money, and really, very few players outside of perhaps the top 3-4 guys in the league are worth supermaxes. But you're not going to keep your elite talent without offering them to the guys that qualify. KAT's coming off the best year of his career and we're coming off probably our most promising one as a franchise since 2004, decent time to be a Timberwolves fan.
KGdaBom
RealGM
Posts: 19,672
And1: 4,965
Joined: Jun 22, 2017
         

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#77 » by KGdaBom » Fri Jul 1, 2022 4:43 am

D1SGRUNTL3D wrote:Woj just tweeted KAT got that bag.

Read on Twitter
?s=21&t=vHssBJofZ9cNo1noWZnSTA

Well he’s here for his prime.

Karl-Anthony Towns. Wolf for life. :D :rockon: :clap: :rock:
shangrila
RealGM
Posts: 13,000
And1: 6,080
Joined: Dec 21, 2009
Location: Land of Aus
 

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#78 » by shangrila » Fri Jul 1, 2022 5:56 am

He’s not worth it but it’s the cost of doing business so…fine.
MN7725
Veteran
Posts: 2,674
And1: 1,088
Joined: Jun 19, 2017

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#79 » by MN7725 » Fri Jul 1, 2022 6:15 am

the extension begins in 2024-25 season

it looks like now next cap spike from new tv deal will likely be the 2025-26 season, need to keep that context
% of cap
minimus
RealGM
Posts: 11,508
And1: 3,746
Joined: Jan 28, 2011
Location: Germany, Stuttgart area
 

Re: **The Official Karl-Anthony Towns Thread: Part Two** 

Post#80 » by minimus » Fri Jul 1, 2022 7:16 am

Okay, numbers are fine. Both on-court (Towns stats) and off-court (Towns contract). Now I want to ask Karl one simple thing: please DONT care about numbers now!

Take last difficult shots in the clutch even if they will ruin your shooting stats. You are already one of the greatest shooters in NBA history.
Don't try to impress anyone with these sling over head, behind the back, no look passes. You are NOT Jokic! Execute within offense, take your shots.

With all respect, love and support,
Max

Return to Minnesota Timberwolves