BlacJacMac wrote:KGdaBom wrote:BlacJacMac wrote:
I'm not arguing against reach. I'm the one that brought it up...
Do you think we're arguing? if we are I had no clue about it. I'm discussing the advantage of reach and eye level.
If you think you're the one who brought up reach being an advantage I can most certainly let you know others have probably brought it up from before you were born and nobody I've ever heard of thinks it's not an advantage. Eye level is less often discussed because it is usually inferred by height. However, the height at the top of ones head gives no advantage at all. Eye level does. That's why I'm bringing it up. If you think eye level gives no advantage then we are arguing.
In this discussion, not the history of the world...
Was just wondering why you were explaining to me why reach is an advantage when I was the one that introduced it
to this particular discussion.
Since you need an explanation here goes. It's going to be long and boring.
People on the board were discussing height and if it should be done in shoes. Height always implies reach and eye level. You made the distinction of reach rather than just height being an advantage which is correct, but once again height implies reach. Congratulations on making the distinction, but it's kind of a Captain Obvious thing. I then brought up eye level which is a very significant thing and you made a cranky IMO comment seeming to disparage eye level as if it offered no advantage. I replied in very simple terms why eye level was an advantage. At that point I was of the belief that you recognized eye level was an advantage and thought the issue was resolved.
At that point I continued discussing reach and eye level being an advantage. I wasn't explaining it to you. I wasn't arguing with you. I wasn't directing it at you. I was simply discussing the merits of height reach, and eye level in general. I was annoyed that you felt you deserved credit for introducing reach into the conversation so I pointed out that it's already something everybody knows. There is your long and boring answer.