ImageImageImageImageImage

Sharks trade Toskala and Bell

Swift21
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 465
Joined: Jan 05, 2004

Sharks trade Toskala and Bell 

Post#1 » by Swift21 » Fri Jun 22, 2007 5:00 pm

We get Toronto's 13th pick and second round pick this year and we get a 4th round pick in 09.

Plus we get more cap space to use. I love this deal, good trade DW.

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/article. ... 122912_664
User avatar
Contract Season
General Manager
Posts: 7,821
And1: 31
Joined: Feb 17, 2003
Location: Toronto

 

Post#2 » by Contract Season » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:45 pm

Of course you do :D
I don't like it at all for the Leafs.
Bell is a bum and making way too much money.
Toskala is pretty good, but now you've ruined Raycroft's confidence, he is now useless but making a ton of money for years to come.
Plus, what can you Shark fans tell me about Toskala's health history?
It seems like he's missed tons of time over the years with groin problems.
Is this a Hasek situation where Leaf fans are always going to be worried about Toskala missing large chunks of time with groin problems or am I overreacting?

I really wanted the Leafs to take Esposito at 13, so if he's already gone I'll like this trade better.
I suspect you guys will wait to get the pick until 2008 anyways, since it's a way better draft. But then again, the Leafs will quite likely be picking in the 15-20 range next year instead of 13 since Toskala will win them more games than Raycroft did, so who knows what Wilson will decide.
If a guy like Esposito is around at 13, you'll probably keep the pick this year.
User avatar
MAS
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,264
And1: 35
Joined: Aug 12, 2004
Location: Thornhill

 

Post#3 » by MAS » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:58 pm

CS, Montreal is trying to trade up for Espo, so He will be gone
Swift21
General Manager
Posts: 8,599
And1: 465
Joined: Jan 05, 2004

 

Post#4 » by Swift21 » Fri Jun 22, 2007 9:03 pm

Toskala has been a good netminder for mianly half seasons with the Sharks.

But we'll see how he produces when he's a number 1 goalie for a whole season. I think he's up for task and he's a much bigger upgrade over Raycroft.
harding156
Banned User
Posts: 3,582
And1: 5
Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Contact:

 

Post#5 » by harding156 » Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:37 am

I've never been a fan of salary dumps, but I will this time if it lands us a player we need.
User avatar
FNQ
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 62,963
And1: 20,007
Joined: Jul 16, 2006
Location: EOL 6/23
   

 

Post#6 » by FNQ » Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:40 am

It got us Logan Couture... who I'm a big fan of. I think he'll see some ice time in 2008. His good 2006/07 in the minors is highlighted by the fact that he had mononucleosis in the beginning of the season.

What worries me about that pick, however, is that Logan is a pure C. He shouldnt ever be on the wings - hes just too good a passer. With Pavelski on board, Goc and Curtis Brown likely to stick around, and of course, Super Joe... that leaves one C with a hefty salary. This pick actually might sway me to be ok w/trading Marleau, so long as we get Drury out of it... Drury - Thornton - Cheechoo would be a nightmarish line.
ilooklikekirk
Junior
Posts: 398
And1: 0
Joined: May 22, 2007
Location: Yay Area
Contact:

 

Post#7 » by ilooklikekirk » Sat Jun 23, 2007 5:49 am

I love it for the Sharsk, being able to dump 3.25 million in salary, and get 3 draft picks for him, i love it.....they would have gotten nothing for them and in 2 years they would have no Bell, no Toskala and no 5.25 million
Great Basketball site I've been working on
http://www.freewebs.com/nba208/nbaforum.htm

Return to San Jose Sharks