Official Game Thread: Nets @ Rockets (64)

Serpo · Post #101 » by **Serpo** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:11 am

It's pretty obvios if the Team's not going to make the playoffs or at least start to play better again that Frank's not going to be back .

To fire him now wouldn't change much there aren't much good coaches out there who are willing to take a team when the season's going to end soon.

And take another Boylen-type interim coach right now isn't better then Frank

NetsForce · Post #102 » by **NetsForce** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:15 am

Man... Let's commence Operation OJ Mayo ASAP... I'll get to work on the signature tomorrow...

A.J. · Post #103 » by **A.J.** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:22 am

good game guys

isekii · Post #104 » by **isekii** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:29 am

A.J. wrote:good game guys

Great game..
Glad you won....

Come on TOP 3 pick!

St_Patrick_Nets · Post #105 » by **St_Patrick_Nets** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:36 am

welcome your New Jersey Tanknets!

apart from the perfect game we just had ( :banghead:

),just wanted to say my compatriot luis scola is not a flopper (same with manu),maybe there physic makes them get more fouls than usual....,but they are not cheaters by any means.

xcomputerman · Post #106 » by **xcomputerman** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:02 am

fasca wrote:if the guy who dunks on mutumbo isnt allowed to do the finger wag then mutumbo shouldnt either.... at least be consistent

Actually, the rule is that taunting another player results in an automatic tech. Deke is allowed to do the finger wag as long as he does it towards the crowd. RJ got the tech because he wagged the finger in Deke's face.

Serpo · Post #107 » by **Serpo** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:05 am

xcomputerman wrote:-= original quote snipped =-

Actually, the rule is that taunting another player results in an automatic tech. Deke is allowed to do the finger wag as long as he does it towards the crowd. RJ got the tech because he wagged the finger in Deke's face.

What a stupid rule , take's a lot of passion out of the Game.

60cent · Post #108 » by **60cent** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:19 am

Too much Josh Boone this past few games. No defense at all.

S.I.C. GM · Post #109 » by **S.I.C. GM** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:47 pm

NICE WIN!!!!!!!!!

Disclaimer: In no way am I condoning TANKING.

S.I.C. GM · Post #110 » by **S.I.C. GM** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:50 pm

Even in Tank Mode, Frank doesnt know how to coach.

Play the young guys more.

Thorn has to really look at these games. Frank isnt doing our young guys any good. How can MWill and Harris combine for 2 asts. This isnt good. This is why I truly believe MWill should be pushed as lead PG and Harris as more of a SG. One of them has to be pushed to be the floor leader. Harris is too good of a scorer. I think Frand should have plays for him off MWill.

MrDollarBills · Post #111 » by **MrDollarBills** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 1:57 pm

S.I.C. GM wrote:

Disclaimer: In no way am I condoning TANKING.

As the minority owner of this team would say,

"We don't believe you, you need more people"

MrDollarBills · Post #112 » by **MrDollarBills** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:07 pm

S.I.C. GM wrote:Even in Tank Mode, Frank doesnt know how to coach.

This statement speaks volumes.

And Sean needs to get at least 30 minutes a game now, this season is lost and he needs to get experience, especially playing alongside Devin and Nenad. I think he and Nenad could be a solid duo with time to gel.

Josh "Baby Poop" Boone is falling out of favor with me with his soft sissy boy play. The kid is regressing and has stopped playing like a man

EFF · Post #113 » by **EFF** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:38 pm

thats what ive been saying about Boone.

And Frank's not coaching in tank mode because he doesn't realize we're tanking. He still thinks he's trying to win games and that he'll still have job next season. Both are illusions....hopefully

NetsForce · Post #114 » by **NetsForce** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:47 pm

Wow Mutombo won the poll 18-0...

dacher · Post #115 » by **dacher** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:19 pm

Wow. We are a horrible passing, hideously slow passing, non-running team. Unable get open looks against 1/2 decent defenses. We used to clank most of our open looks, now we don't even get those open looks.

What happened to Marcus pick and rolls?

S.I.C. GM · Post #116 » by **S.I.C. GM** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 3:19 pm

[quote="dacher"]Wow. We are a horrible passing, hideously slow passing, non-running team. Unable get open looks against 1/2 decent defenses. We used to clank most of our open looks, now we don't even get those open looks.

What happened to Marcus pick and rolls?[ /quote]

Lawrence Frank

MrDollarBills · Post #117 » by **MrDollarBills** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:38 pm

dacher wrote:Wow. We are a horrible passing, hideously slow passing, non-running team. Unable get open looks against 1/2 decent defenses. We used to clank most of our open looks, now we don't even get those open looks.

What happened to Marcus pick and rolls?

They got buried somewhere after page 76 of the 100 play play book, obviously.

EFF · Post #118 » by **EFF** » Tue Mar 11, 2008 4:42 pm

100 plays? i can count maybe 2. the rest of the playbook is filled with "I <3 Jason Kidd" and "I miss you twin" doodles.

Official Game Thread: Nets @ Rockets (64)

Who is teh more sexy?