Buttah304 wrote:Fury wrote:Buttah304 wrote:
Sham - has iHart grabbed one legitimate rebound in traffic this series? Feels like he’s been overmatched physically in every game. His January 12.5 RPG run had people drinking the kool-aid but the reality is that he’s grabbing you 7 boards at best these days.
Has he had some nice moments passing? Absolutely. But we need him to be an absolute menace on the boards & defensively. He’s also blocked just 2 shots in 136min vs Indiana. Its like he’s morphing into Nurkic
Gee, I don't know, maybe the one that won us Game 2 vs. the Sixers
Hartenstein was good the first two games vs. Indiana. He had a great Game 2. He was so so in Game 3 and he was bad in Game 4. Lets not get carried away with BS agendas just cause someone is a fanboy of someone on the same team. It's **** weird and annoying. Overall, he hasn't been great, but he's had his games and moments.
iHart had the single worst defensive rating vs Philly throughout the entirety of the series at 129.9
What exactly is he doing now vs Indiana? Is he stopping Turner - certainly not. Preventing layups at the rim? Definitely not his DFG% <6 feet was an elite 53% (regular season) and this series it’s 67%. For a guy whom during January/February was having 1000 posts about his “stocks” - he’s yet to record a steal vs Indiana and hasn’t since game 5 vs Philly. He’s AVG .5 blocks over his last 8 playoff games.
Just because someone points out that a player has been disappointing doesn’t mean they are creating an agenda. I dunno why your feelings are hurt
He was a net positive in the first two games. He was great in game 2. He was huge in Game 2 vs the Sixers, and you ignoring that then telling me I have an agenda? I'm telling you he hasn't been great but to say that there's been no positives is nuts.
The guy talking about "1,000 posts about his stocks" is telling me about agendas. Keep your projection to yourself.
You asked a question and I answered it. I dunno why your feelings are hurt.